Microsoft Updates Its Facial Recognition Tech to Work Better With All Skin Tones, Genders

Microsoft is updating its facial recognition tech to work better for everyone. The company identified diversity issues with facial recognition technologies throughout the industry, stating that the systems are usually less accurate on darker skin tones, and performed worse for females with darker skin. So what’s the reason behind all these anomalies?

Microsoft is blaming it on the training data used to train its machine learning models for the facial recognition tech. The company says the training data used to train these models aren’t diverse enough, meaning they mostly include males with light skin tones, less of people with darker skin tones and less of females with dark skins. “Collecting more data that captures the diversity of our world and being careful about how to measure performance are important steps toward mitigating these issues,” Microsoft Research’s Ece Kamar said in a statement.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

To mitigate the issue, Microsoft expanded its dataset to include more diversity, with an expanded dataset that includes things like different hairstyles, jewellery, eyewear, as well as the skin tones. With the new dataset, Microsoft has been able to reduce the error rates for all genders with a dark skin by up to 20 times, and the error rates were reduced by 9 times for all women.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 6 comments

  • Simard57

    26 June, 2018 - 11:24 am

    <p>is this for Windows Hello logins?</p>

    • maethorechannen

      Premium Member
      26 June, 2018 - 11:33 am

      <blockquote><a href="#286299"><em>In reply to Simard57:</em></a></blockquote><p>The blog post mentions Azure Cognitive Services.</p>

    • Simard57

      03 July, 2018 - 2:54 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#286299"><em>In reply to Simard57:</em></a></blockquote><p>-1 = harsh</p><p><br></p>

  • AnOldAmigaUser

    Premium Member
    26 June, 2018 - 1:18 pm

    <p>This points to the bigger issue with AI. If we train the system with information that carries forward our own biases, we will have enabled systems that are just as biased as ourselves, but faster. Perhaps we need to put more emphasis on Actual Intelligence.</p>

    • Subhadip Sen

      26 June, 2018 - 2:27 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#286315"><em>In reply to AnOldAmigaUser:</em></a></blockquote><p>This has proven to be the case over and over again – AI will pick up human biases, often to disturbing effect. I'm afraid actual intelligence isn't going to come from humans generally.</p>

      • AnOldAmigaUser

        Premium Member
        05 July, 2018 - 3:28 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#286357"><em>In reply to Sen1:</em></a></blockquote><p>How did the song go in "The Meaning of Life"? </p><p>"There must be intelligent life somewhere, cause there's bloody all down here on earth."</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC