Google’s search engine is the entry point to the Internet for a significant number of people around the globe. Open your browser, enter a search query, and you begin your journey to finding information across the massive infrastructure that is known as the Internet.
Because of this, Google wields a significant amount of power over what and how users see content. A few years ago, Google began supplementing search results with ‘information panels, as Google calls them, and these panels have been using lyrics from Genius.com without compensation.
Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!
"*" indicates required fields
But for Genius, they needed a way to prove that the lyrics were coming from their site and not another source and they caught Google lifting the content by using Morse code. According to WSJ, Genius changed how apostrophes were used in lyrics, switching between straight and curly, in the lyrics, and when converted to dots and dashes, the code spells out “Red Handed”.
When the apostrophe pattern showed up in Google’s search results, it became clear that the content was being directly lifted from Genius and not another source.
For Genius, it’s not quite clear if they have a case against Google as the company licenses the lyrics from record labels and does not own them. But, they do own the website Google is lifting the content from without attribution, and this is being used to further Google’s objective of improving it’s search results while also being able to show additional advertisements at the detriment of Genius.com.
Of course, there is a bit of irony in the complaint by Genius too. The company got its start by stealing lyrics from other sites and only started licensing the lyrics after it faced legal pressure.
Considering that Google may be facing a new antitrust investigation in the US, this is one more piece of evidence of the company potentially abusing its position in the marketplace. And as it becomes more clear exactly how powerful Google.com has become and how much control it has over content on the Internet, one more piece of negative publicity at this time is not a good thing for Alphabet Inc.
Bats
<p>I'm sorry, but I fail to see how this is an "abuse" of power? How is this action, allegedly by Google, an example of their marketplace position?</p><p><br></p><p>"<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">And as it becomes more clear exactly how powerful Google.com has become and how much control…." </span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">LOL….I don't get it. Again, how is this related to market positioning? Only the market leaders can do this?</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">The WSJ article Samms refers to make no mention of anti-trust activity, with regards to this issue. It mentions the possible anti-trust probe, but only as a separate matter. However, here, Brad Samms is saying that they are related. </span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">"</span><span style="color: rgb(49, 50, 51);">Google has been found to be using content from Genius.com without attribution, this is one more piece of evidence of the company potentially abusing its position in the marketplace" – Brad Samms</span></p><p><br></p><p>This reminds me of the time, he also post that the Surface Headset was so popular that MSFT encored with earbuds. I know he changed it later, but…..lol. I also remember the time he called the Surface Pro, the "darling of the pc industry." LOL. This is hilarious. </p><p><br></p><p>Exactly where is Brad Samms from? Is it from a state where recreational marijuana is legal? (lol)</p>
Stooks
<blockquote><em><a href="#435613">In reply to Bats:</a></em></blockquote><p>-20 nice. Everyone that comes to this site knows you are probably a Google employee or a super fan. Hard ignore on your comments when it comes to matters of Google.</p>
Stooks
<p>Google and Facebook……avoid when possible. The are the very reason behind things like GDPR, which the US needs badly.</p>