In reply to codymesh:I’d guess there are a lot of upgrades due to the inclusion of 5G.
cavalier_eternal
Member Since Jul 2020
0 Posts
108 Comments
100% 
0% | Subject | Posted By | Forum | Category | Last Activity | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
comment
There are some math issues in when it comes to your growth percentages. Services Q220 13,348, Q221 16,901 tha
comment
In reply to Greg Green:Their products with higher margins were the one’s that grew the most.
comment
In reply to matsan:Markets are forward looking so the performance over the first three months of the year were
comment
The new iMac is probably the best example of why Apple is moving on from Intel. There is no way they could hav
comment
It’s kinda funny, when the Apple Watch came out a fair number of people derided it for taking into account f
comment
In reply to mattspeterson:What is weird is that it isn’t even the cheapest. It’s 70 dollars more than the
comment
Given that this is part of the MFi program I’d wager this is entirely about growing the services business an
comment
In reply to samp:They dropped the “i” branding on new products lines and services awhile ago. IPad and i
comment
In reply to jgraebner:I totally understand the point Intel is making and am not disputing their claims. You li
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott:I’m having trouble understanding who you think is upset here. I just asked where t
comment
Bluetooth Audio has some latency but I don’t know that it is the cause of what you are seeing. I think it m
comment
In reply to jgraebner:So your claims are :”Apple has pretty much continuously been touting their claimed sup
comment
In reply to jgraebner:Serious question, where has Apple done this? They talked about the performance at the la
comment
In reply to SvenJ:What’s funny is that during the entire time those ads ran Macs had intel processors so the
comment
In reply to bkkcanuck:Spot on. People really don’t get that one of the basic principals of advertising is yo
comment
In reply to dftf:I agree that there will likely be an uptick in upgrades but given how Apple is spreading out
comment
In reply to bkkcanuck:I’m not sure if you are including AMD in the not having competitive chips or simply me
comment
The only messaging I’m getting from this is Intel is truly rattled by Apple Silicon but for the life of me,
comment
“And this isn’t even Apple’s first smart speaker failure: The firm introduced an iPod Hi-Fi in 2006 and
comment
In reply to SyncMe:You are right, nor did Apple say that they cut iPhone mini orders. Both what I said and the
comment
In reply to james.h.robinson:Number two isn’t correct. While Apple Music is the default users can switch the
comment
So “self-serving” is fine because that is what corporations do then how is using the word to describe Micr
comment
In reply to dftf:Weird that a comment on the quality of journalism somehow made me looking for “good Apple s
comment
In reply to dftf:Yes, I know what the headline says and my comment doesn’t say that Paul is claiming the iP
comment
So Apple is still planning to sell 230 million phones in 2021 but they are now planning for the ratio to skew
comment
In reply to nbplopes:“The idea that the App Store legitimizes legally your business to operate indirectly in
comment
In reply to nbplopes:Dude, all I did was point out what the App Store policy is with respect to physical goods
comment
In reply to nbplopes:I quoted part of the article where Paul said prices for customers would be lower. So, tha
comment
In reply to dftf:I was pointing out two things that wright_js got wrong about App Store policy, i wasn’t def
comment
In reply to nbplopes:I specifically said that my experience with the App Store doesn’t apply to all business
comment
In reply to wright_is:Two corrections to your post. Apple doesn’t require use of their payment system for ph
comment
In reply to nbplopes:Please re-read my comment. I am not assuming anything, I’m providing a first hand accou
comment
In reply to Calibr21:Where did I say users didn’t have the right to care?The article and my comments were sp
comment
In reply to dftf:Apple has argued that they do have costs that brick and mortar stores don’t and there is so
comment
In reply to HellcatM:What do you think it is about to the developers? The current slap fight between Apple and
comment
“Prices to consumers would be lower if developers weren’t charged up to 30 percent for all paid apps and s
comment
In reply to Chris_Kez:Ohh... we are opening a can or worms now, also I have had a few beers that makes me pron
comment
I have loved the resurgence in vinyl of over the last decade and a half. It’s mostly nostalgia on my part bu
comment
In reply to sevenacids:The renewed interest in vinyl has come with an uptick in band recording forging digital
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott:That was weirdly defense for a comment that said nothing negative about you whatsoev
comment
In reply to SvenJ:Well he is just a tech enthusiast :)
comment
Nothing Essential ..... That is a tough marketing sell.
comment
In reply to Mcgillivray:RIM is still around, somehow. They did change their name though.
comment
In reply to MikeCerm:I guess the difference is the HDMI is actually supported by Apple.
comment
In reply to MikeCerm:Yeah, not the case at all. As my longer post above points out, I’m happily living a USB
comment
In reply to MikeGalos:Current iMac: USB Type A , Thunderbolt 3/USB-C, SDXC slot, EthernetCurrent Mac Mini: US
comment
“M1-based Macs can only work with a single external display, and not multiple external displays.“This isn
comment
The problem with ads like this is you are ceding that whomever you are attacking is, at a minimum, perceived t
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott:Huh? If you thought the product line was “a waste of time and money” and you now
comment
In reply to b6gd:Huh? I have re-read my comment and I am missing where I said or inferred Apple, Intel or AMD
comment
In reply to toukale:True story, a few years ago I was on a trip and sat next to an intel employee on a flight.
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott:That is a head scratcher of a comment. We are saying the same thing here. You didn
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott:Well before you it was released you declared it a failure because Apple said it wasn
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott:Wanting to know the source is totally reasonable. But there is a world of a differen
comment
In reply to scovious:I don’t think the issue is that companies don’t want to compete with the Apple Watch,
comment
In reply to Jim_Lewis:To be fair to Paul, he has moved away from his initially stance on the Apple Watch and h
comment
In reply to bkkcanuck:Yeah, people seem to remember the cash investment part of that deal and forget that it a
comment
It’s funny, every produce that Apple has released that falls into the Wearables, Home and Accessories (Apple
comment
” Why? Did Microsoft run into issues porting the suite to the new Universal app format? Is the performa
comment
In reply to JG1170:That is no way answers the damages question. What tangible damages can Spotify point to? Al
comment
In reply to codymesh:What are the damages? To date Spotify has yet to show damages from Apple’s alleged abus
comment
In reply to glenn8878:Yes, that is what I said in my initial post.My point is and was that your initial commen
comment
This is the smart way to address Apple's exorbitant pricing. Man-child, Tim Sweeney, could learn from thi
comment
In reply to pecosbob04:I don't think there was an issue with what Michael Dell said, he didn't see a
comment
In reply to Minke:That isn’t accurate. Both set pricing prior to the market being a duopoly and neither has
comment
This makes more sense than that rumor that he was going to join Apple.
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott:Divisive is probably a bit strong. But really, what pitch person from a major compan
comment
In reply to navarac:Again, the debate about the price is legitimate. Saying Google and Apple are simply sittin
comment
In reply to Usman:I think there there is a reasonable argument that 30% is high for what Apple or Google offer
comment
In reply to openmisere:If it's deliberate then that is even worse of a decision. I watched the first few
comment
I'm super curious about what Epic's strategy is here as it is bigger than simply suing Apple and Goo
comment
In reply to murray judy:Yep, totally different reactions for sure. I'd say at the point that you post it
comment
In reply to pecosbob04:Meh, I see most of Paul's writing as editorials vs. news. So there is a lot of lee
comment
In reply to wright_is:I understand due process and my comments actually is in favor of it. You seem to have en
comment
Who decided to let Panos wing it for his parts? The other folks presenting were polished and solid which only
comment
So a lot/most folks have already made up their mind on what the legal outcome should be in both of these cases
comment
The outcome of this one will be interesting and not just for the legal outcome. Epic could have sued Apple wit
comment
In reply to yoshi:iSub was an actual product by Harmon Kardon. It was subwoofer add-on for iMacs in like 2000.
comment
In reply to pecosbob04:I looked at the Apple website and it said 1 yr free with a new device otherwise a 7 day
comment
The math there seems off. If the bundle is going to family sharing based wouldn't you start with the Appl
comment
In reply to pecosbob04:Just flag the clown for Spam and Abuse. No need to engage with a dinosaur.
comment
I don't find the pricing tag shocking or maybe I should say that I expected it to be expensive. This is a
comment
I feel like the most interesting part is missing, from the ruling not the article. I want to know what the rem
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott:Weird, by the looks of it he made his accusations to a tech news site who’s audien
comment
Hubris is excessive self pride and confidence and I don't think that is what's happening here as tha
comment
A monopoly is more about influence and control than market share. That said, I personally feel like Paul often
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott:Right, but when Sonos claims Amazon is using abusing their monopoly it is a reasonab
comment
In reply to msorrentino:The definition of monopoly is the tough bit. A monopoly is defined as possess sufficie
comment
In reply to BeckoningEagle:Yeah, I get that it is smart speakers but the claim is they are selling smart speak
comment
I buy the argument that it could be predatory pricing but what is the monopoly that speakers are tied to? Amaz
comment
In reply to Stooks:“NPR is going to say the government has no evidence because they hate the man running it.
comment
In reply to Stooks:Yes, we have established NPR doesn't have access to information from the NSA and other
comment
In reply to Stooks:No one, including NPR, has said they know what the NSA or other secret government agencies
comment
Nothing wrong with the phone but why? From a business standpoint Google is still largely based on revenue. The
comment
In reply to Pbike908:Google doesn't make money off of Android phone sales, or at least not the one's
comment
After buying TikTok they can bring back the Kin and have it just boot directly into the App. Maybe include a P
comment
So asking an Invoke to do something will be a lot like talking to my ex. MS is missing rebranding moment. "Our
comment
In reply to Waethorn:I might be missing something here but how would they be in competition?
comment
In reply to trparky:I get the desire to compare the two but their revenue streams are so different it really d
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott👍
comment
Revenue was 59 billion not 46 which would make iPhone 40 something percent not 57. also it’s apple’s q3 no
comment
In reply to brduffy:Poor wording would explain the first quote but not the second.
comment
I can't but help but think that the EU is inadvertently keeping Google from wasting it's money.
comment
I think there is certainly debate for if Apple should be held accountable even if they are to the dominate pla
comment
In reply to billreilly:Yeah you could upload to Strava, but Strava doesn't offer the detail that Garmin C
comment
"the functionality of Garmin products was not affected, other than the ability to access online services."I ha
comment
In reply to solomonrex:What does that to do with if TSMC would take Intel's business or not?
comment
In reply to shameermulji:An intel doesn’t make chips for fabless designers. So, they aren’t really in dire
comment
In reply to proftheory:what does that have to do with the question about TSMC taking intel’s business? 🤷
comment
In reply to shameermulji:Part of TSCM’s model is making chips designed by other companies. They make chips d
comment
In reply to codymesh:Comparing the stock price of two companies is a meaningless unless they both have the sam
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott:To be clear, I'm not saying AMD is doing poorly "bad", the chip market isn'
comment
For context, AMD made 6.7 billion in 2019 or less than half of what Intel makes in a single quarter. So any te
comment
In reply to Waethorn:MSFT is up 25% for the year even with today's 3% job. It's doing just fine.
comment
In reply to pecosbob04:It must have been wishful thinking on my part.
comment
In reply to pecosbob04:These results are already baked into the stock price. The market is forward looking and
comment
In reply to paul-thurrott:My comment was directly related to what you were talking about. And saying that I’
comment
In reply to Truffles:Exactly, and for the amount of time Paul spent writing about the case I’m surprised he
comment
In reply to nbplopes:I don’t know what that has to do with what I said.
comment
I had to register just to comment on this. Why is adding a sim to a PC so expensive? It isn’t. Your answer