Intel Kills Off Compute Card
- Paul Thurrott
- Mar 22, 2019
-
7
Two years after it first introduced the credit card-sized PC, Intel confirmed that it has now killed off the Compute Card.
“We continue to believe [that] modular computing is a market where there are many opportunities for innovation,” an Intel statement first provided to Tom’s Hardware explains. “However, as we look at the best way to address this opportunity, we’ve made the decision that we will not develop new Compute Card products moving forward. We will continue to sell and support the current Compute Card products through 2019 to ensure our customers receive the support they need with their current solutions, and we are thankful for their partnership on this change.”
Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox
Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!
"*" indicates required fields
Intel announced the first Compute Card at CES in January 2017, and it was innovative enough that I included it in my Best of CES roundup that year.
“Determined not to cede the ultra-mobile market to ARM, Intel unleashed an unexpected treat at CES 2017, the Intel Compute Card,” I wrote at the time. “This credit card-sized PC can power IoT-based devices or be used as a standalone computer, and it features a USB-C Plus extension connector for USB, PCIe, HDMI, DisplayPort, and other PC capabilities. But the processor, RAM, storage, and wireless connectivity are available right on the card. This is an innovative and versatile form factor that will take the PC to new usage scenarios in 2017.”
Compute Card was designed to compete with other small form-factor (SFF) PCs, including those based on USB sticks. It was offered a variety of configurations, from low-end Celeron/Pentium-based systems to more capable Y-series Core i3 and i5 variants. Each shipped with 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of eMMC (on the low-end) or 128 GB of SSD storage. Intel also allowed hardware makers to integrate Compute Card into their own solutions using a Compute Card Device Design Kit. I’m guessing that few took up Intel on this offer, though I reported in January 2017 that NexDock was one of them.
Indeed, NexDock was among the first to signal a warning about Compute Card.
“We just found out that the future of Compute Card is uncertain,” a NexDock blog post revealed yesterday. Intel might not come up with a new generation Compute Card and their 7th generation CPU might be the last one to be manufactured … we are putting the NexPad project on hold until there is more visibility about the future of Compute Cards.”
Ah well. It was a cool idea, and I’m surprised it wasn’t more successful.
Tagged with
Conversation 7 comments
-
skane2600
<blockquote><em><a href="#414722">In reply to Angusmatheson:</a></em></blockquote><p>Servers have much more in common with PCs than they do with mobile or connected devices. The percentage of ARM-based servers is very tiny. There's no reason to believe that Windows on ARM will ever perform as well or better than a similarly priced Intel PC when running non-UWP programs.</p>
-
skane2600
<p>Core functionality in a small package has been possible for a very long time, but you still need to add a keyboard, monitor and possibly a mouse to have a useful system. The size of the box is almost irrelevant as a practical matter for basic computing. You're going to need quite a bit of space to use them anyway. IMO that's why these devices haven't really taken off.</p>