Apple CEO Tim Cook had his Perestroika moment this week when he opened up about a secret autonomous car project that his firm has been working on.
Mr. Cook, tear down this wall.
Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!
"*" indicates required fields
“We’re focusing on autonomous [car] systems,” Mr. Cook said during a Bloomberg interview. “We sort of see it as the mother of all AI projects, [and] it’s probably one of the most difficult A.I. projects actually to work on.”
A public admission like this is rare for Apple, but perhaps this is part of a broader plan to slowly open up the company in these post-Steve Jobs years. Cook has opened up parts of iOS, which one might consider Apple’s crown jewels, by building extensibility into the system. And more recently, it has been open about its mistakes, first by apologizing for its lack of Mac Pro updates, and more recently by quickly revving its lackluster new MacBook Pro laptops.
That said, Apple’s car project was perhaps the least secret of Apple’s secret projects. So Cook is essentially confirming something that we already knew.
But he also explains why Apple is so concerned with this technology. And it seems to boil down to the company not missing a major tech wave, similar to the discussions we’ve had around Microsoft and other platform makers.
“There is a major disruption looming there,” he said, “not only for self-driving cars, but also the electrification [of cars]. If you’ve driven an all-electric car, it’s actually a marvelous experience. And it’s a marvelous experience not to stop at the gas station. Plus, you have ride-sharing on top of this. So you’ve got three vectors of change happening generally in the same time frame.”
As Cook notes above, Apple is focusing on the autonomous systems part of this, but he also notes that self-driving cars are only a subset of that part as well, though he doesn’t elaborate on that.
“Autonomy is something that is incredibly exciting for us,” he says. “But we’ll see where it takes us. We’re not really saying, from a product point of view, what we will do. But we are being straightforward that it is a core technology that we view as very important.”
Stooks
<blockquote><a href="#125149"><em>In reply to scribz:</em></a></blockquote><p>Why do companies get rid of on premise data centers and move most if not everything to the cloud?</p><p><br></p><p>Cost. </p><p><br></p><p>BMW is a premium brand, so is Apple. If BMW can outsource that AI driving to another brand with the same reputation and save money by not having an entire AI develop team inside BMW, which makes cars, why not?</p>
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#125156"><em>In reply to Darmok N Jalad:</em></a></blockquote><p>Probably better to evaluate alternatives when both are actually available. IMO, a fully capable self-driving system is more complex than anything Apple, MS, Google, Facebook, Amazon or Tesla has ever done. The legal issues will also be difficult to navigate. When a self-driving car crashes, the owner shouldn't be held responsible but the company who designed the system should. Legally the idea that lives are saved in the aggregate (if in fact, they really are) means nothing. Expect massive rewards to victims due to the deep pockets of corporations and the fact that people generally don't pity them the way they might say a drunk driver who made a mistake.</p>
Locust Infested Orchard Inc.
<blockquote><a href="#125215"><em>In reply to Brian Hodges:</em></a></blockquote><p>Also, they'll be a new model same time every year, and every component company will want a slice of the action by flooding the market with various iCar parts, e.g., an adapter to place on the end of the iCar charging power plug, because the iCar has a proprietary non-standard 18 pin connector.</p>