Qualcomm Calls on China to Enforce iPhone Sales Ban Immediately

Intel Threatens to Sue Qualcomm Over Windows 10

Qualcomm this week complained that Apple’s attempts to stall the iPhone sales ban in China should be ignored. And it wants China to enforce the ban immediately, pointing out, too, that it should apply to the firm’s newest models.

“Despite Apple’s efforts to downplay the significance of the order and its claims of various ways it will address the infringement, Apple apparently continues to flout the legal system by violating the injunctions,” Qualcomm general counsel Don Rosenberg told Reuters.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Qualcomm, as you may recall, won a ban on iPhone sales in China thanks to Apple violating two of its patents related to touch-based image resizing and app management. Apple has tried to stall this ban, explaining that the ban applies only to iOS 11-based iPhones. And not to its latest iPhones.

But Rosenberg says none of that is true. It very much does apply to these iPhones, he says. And the ban in China should be enforced immediately.

“Apple’s statements following the issuance of the preliminary injunction have been deliberate attempts to obfuscate and misdirect,” he added.

Rosenberg is right: Reuters obtained a copy of the actual ban order and it does not exclude iPhones running iOS 12 or the newest iPhone models. So those reports were both spurious and guided by Apple.

“[Apple] are legally obligated to immediately cease sales, offers for sale and importation of the devices identified in the orders and to prove compliance in court,” Rosenberg said last week. That’s still true.

 

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 8 comments

  • lvthunder

    Premium Member
    18 December, 2018 - 10:40 am

    <p>So if Apple wins this case in the end does Qualcomm have to pay Apple for all the lost revenue this ban will generate? If not the courts never should of issued the ban to begin with. If Qualcomm wins they will get money from Apple so I don't see the immediate danger of allowing the phones to be sold while the legal process works itself out.</p>

    • Vladimir Carli

      Premium Member
      18 December, 2018 - 4:41 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#383899">In reply to lvthunder:</a></em></blockquote><p><br></p><p>Qualcomm just acts as the most typical patent troll. It's a disgusting enterprise trolling another disgusting enterprise</p>

    • dstrauss

      18 December, 2018 - 5:01 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#383899">In reply to lvthunder:</a></em></blockquote><p>Short answer – one tool tooling another – although I have to say Qualcomm has had a stranglehold on the communications industry for a very long time…</p>

      • aelaan

        18 December, 2018 - 6:10 pm

        <blockquote><em><a href="#384069">In reply to dstrauss:</a></em></blockquote><p>And we all know who is making the money here – corporate lawyers. I just don't understand why these companies just do not get along. In the end, because of all these cost, we as customers are indirectly paying for this.</p>

  • waethorn

    18 December, 2018 - 11:02 am

    <p>Apple = FAKE NEWS</p>

  • dontbe evil

    18 December, 2018 - 4:13 pm

    <p>good QUALCOMM is fighting against apple with apple style</p>

  • Corbey

    Premium Member
    18 December, 2018 - 11:23 pm

    <p>Great image from Godzilla vs King Kong, Paul. Sums up the situation perfectly!</p>

  • Greg Green

    19 December, 2018 - 8:38 am

    <p>Crony capitalism will solve all the big company problems. And it makes fund raising and poltical charity so much more lucrative.</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC