Huawei Shipped 240 Million Smartphones in 2019

Huawei’s two biggest businesses grew at a healthy clip in 2019 despite a U.S. blacklisting, but the firm warned of a “difficult” 2020, noting that it would not “grow as rapidly as [it] did in the first half of 2019.”

“In the long term, the U.S. government will continue to suppress the development of leading technology, a challenging environment for Huawei to survive and thrive,” Huawei chairman Eric Xu wrote in a New Year’s letter to the company’s employees and customers. “The external environment is becoming more complicated than ever, and downward pressure on the global economy has intensified.”

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Huawei is the world’s biggest maker of networking equipment and the world’s second-biggest maker of smartphones. Most analysts believe that Huawei would have surpassed Samsung in 2019 to become the biggest smartphone maker as well, but the U.S. blacklisting has at least temporarily denied it that accolade.

Xu said that Huawei posted revenues of $122 billion in 2019, a new record, and an 18 percent gain year-over-year (YOY). The firm has no obligation to provide such numbers, but it does typically announce its quarterly results in a bid for transparency. The problem, apparently, is that Huawei’s growth slowed dramatically in the second half of the year. Reuters calculates that Huawei’s revenues improved by just 3.9 percent (year-over-year) in the 4th quarter, to about $23.38 billion.

Xu also said that the firm sold 240 million smartphones in 2019, a gain of 20 percent YOY, and higher than analyst estimates. It had sold 206 million units in 2018.

Xu said that Huawei would “go all out” in 2020 to expand its smartphone business by building out its Huawei Mobile Services, a set of services and applications that will replace as many of Google’s popular Android applications as possible. This, of course, is the problem with the U.S. blacklisting of Huawei: It will drive the firm to lessen its reliance on U.S.-based networking, hardware, and software solutions and companies, a move that will ultimately harm the U.S., thanks to Huawei’s massive reach.

And Huawei has seen great success despite a U.S.-led initiative to keep the firm out of emerging 5G networks around the world: Huawei won over 60 5G-related contracts in 2019, over half of them in Europe. But Huawei’s biggest rival, Ericsson, reported that it signed 78 5G-related contracts and agreements with global carriers in 2019.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 41 comments

  • Bats

    31 December, 2019 - 11:16 am

    <p>For one thing…"shipped 240 million phones?" So what and………where?</p><p><br></p><p>Every Microsoft fan should be well aware by now the difference between shipped and sales. That's because Microsoft often uses the shipped figure because it's always the higher amount, which always gives the illusion of success. Every Microsoft fan should know this.</p><p><br></p><p>Second, who cares about Huawei's success? More power to them. Markets adapt. Does Thurrott actually think that the US will suffer at all? Once everything is cleared with the US/China relations…..Huawei will race to the US door in a heartbeat. </p><p><br></p><p><br></p>

    • Paul Thurrott

      Premium Member
      31 December, 2019 - 12:04 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#507977">In reply to Bats:</a></em></blockquote><p>Do I actually think that the US will suffer if Huawei doesn't use or need US-based software, services, or hardware? </p><p><br></p><p>Yes. Obviously.</p><p><br></p><p>The last thing you want is to cure one of the biggest and most powerful tech companies of its need to partner with corporations here. </p>

      • lvthunder

        Premium Member
        01 January, 2020 - 12:53 pm

        <blockquote><em><a href="#508003">In reply to paul-thurrott:</a></em></blockquote><p>That all depends on the outcome. We may suffer in the short term, but if we get a good deal we may end up benefiting in the long run.</p>

        • wright_is

          Premium Member
          02 January, 2020 - 2:56 am

          <blockquote><em><a href="#508448">In reply to lvthunder:</a></em></blockquote><p>The problem is, the USA has shaken confidence in US products, especially tech. A lot of their income is international and the USA is doing its best to sully its name with its international trading partners.</p><p>The clear message that the USA is sending to Europeans and other nations is: don't buy into US technology, you cannot guarantee that you will have access to it, when you wake up tomorrow morning. Buy local.</p>

          • yangstax

            03 January, 2020 - 9:45 pm

            <blockquote>The big lesson Huawei and all other Chinese manufacturers have learned from the Huawei sanctions is to de-Americanize supply chains as fast as they can. Huawei doesn't use American parts for their 5G base stations anymore. Huawei Mate 30/Pro has zero American parts inside and still has sold over 12 million units. American businesses and industries are getting hurts short term and even worse in the long term. They will lose Chinese market eventually. </blockquote><p><br></p>

    • Paul Thurrott

      Premium Member
      31 December, 2019 - 12:05 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#507977">In reply to Bats:</a></em></blockquote><p>Sold means sold. You don't have to be a Microsoft fan to understand words. Not all companies use Microsoft's metric for "sold into the channel." In fact, many big tech firms—Sony and Apple, for example—do not. </p>

  • gartenspartan

    Premium Member
    31 December, 2019 - 1:28 pm

    <p>I think the US government will eventually regret it if Huawei is able to do all of it's business without the need for any american software or equipment. Especially if trade was a large motivation to try and hurt Huawei and therefore China. In the long run, it will hurt google, qualcomm and other manufacturers who deal with Huawei when they come up with all of their own solutions. </p>

    • jchampeau

      Premium Member
      31 December, 2019 - 2:21 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#508082">In reply to gartenspartan:</a></em></blockquote><p>Agreed. It appears this is a very complex issue with lots of dependencies and with huge potential for unintended consequences. This short-term showmanship and scoring of political points could ultimately cost US companies dearly.</p>

      • jimchamplin

        Premium Member
        01 January, 2020 - 11:35 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#508140">In reply to jchampeau:</a></em></blockquote><p>Nah. The consequences are intended. A particular orange person is simply trying to tank the US economy as the next operation in the war on the poor. New and improved with Soviet allies!</p>

        • lvthunder

          Premium Member
          01 January, 2020 - 12:46 pm

          <blockquote><em><a href="#508432">In reply to jimchamplin:</a></em></blockquote><p>You need to seek help for your TDS.</p>

    • lvthunder

      Premium Member
      01 January, 2020 - 12:49 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#508082">In reply to gartenspartan:</a></em></blockquote><p>It depends on the outcome. If they get an agreement with China where they actually stop stealing our IP then it'll be worth it. Remember the whole picture is a lot bigger then just phones.</p>

      • wright_is

        Premium Member
        02 January, 2020 - 2:48 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#508447">In reply to lvthunder:</a></em></blockquote><p>You mean like how the US established itself through IP theft from Europe in the 18th and 19th centuries, then when its own IP reached critical mass, it suddenly became bad to steal IP?</p>

        • clutem1987

          02 January, 2020 - 4:53 pm

          <blockquote><em><a href="#508688">In reply to wright_is:</a></em></blockquote><p>yes. </p>

  • Chris Payne

    31 December, 2019 - 1:34 pm

    <p>"<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Huawei won over 5G-related contracts in 2019"</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Was there supposed to be a count in that sentence? Or was it intended to be used like "Microsoft won over consumers with their mobile phone offerings" or "Satya Nadella won over critics by shuttering Cortana?"</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">I ask because the following sentence gives a count for Ericsson.</span></p>

    • Paul Thurrott

      Premium Member
      31 December, 2019 - 3:36 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#508084">In reply to unkinected:</a></em></blockquote><p>Over 60</p>

  • Philip

    Premium Member
    31 December, 2019 - 3:06 pm

    <p>I was wondering about the missing number in "<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Huawei won over 5G-related contracts in 2019</span>". I searched and found that it was over 50 as of September.</p><p><br></p><p>I also found the sentence identically written at techmirror.com. It is actually this entire post with no mention of Thurrott. The only attribution is a "source link" that brings you back to this page. Is that copyright infringement or do you have to put a copyright notice on every article?</p><p><a href="https://www.techmirror.info/huawei-shipped-240-million-smartphones-in-2019/&quot; target="_blank">https://www.techmirror.info/huawei-shipped-240-million-smartphones-in-2019/</a></p&gt;

    • Paul Thurrott

      Premium Member
      31 December, 2019 - 3:34 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#508185">In reply to PhilByPond:</a></em></blockquote><p>sorry, it's "over 60."</p><p><br></p><p>The TechMirror thing is outright theft.</p>

      • IanYates82

        Premium Member
        31 December, 2019 - 9:37 pm

        <blockquote><em><a href="#508203">In reply to paul-thurrott:</a></em></blockquote><p>Yuck. It's not my content but I feel violated on your behalf. Gross behaviour. </p>

      • irfaanwahid

        02 January, 2020 - 1:33 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#508203">In reply to paul-thurrott:</a></em></blockquote><p>That's not cool at all. They must credit Thurrott site, if not, as Paul said, its outright theft.</p>

  • glenn8878

    31 December, 2019 - 4:41 pm

    <p>The other unmentioned company is Apple who sell its own smartphone platform for years. No one needs Android. If Microsoft wants to get back into the business, then it should learn from Huawei. </p>

    • Paul Thurrott

      Premium Member
      01 January, 2020 - 9:48 am

      No one needs Android? 85 percent of smartphone buyers choose Android and not the iPhone.

      • glenn8878

        01 January, 2020 - 10:24 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#508424">In reply to paul-thurrott:</a></em></blockquote><p>You need to adjust it to include Huawei mobile platform. I have no use for Android because I choose Apple. </p>

        • wp7mango

          01 January, 2020 - 10:53 am

          <blockquote><em><a href="#508426">In reply to glenn8878:</a></em></blockquote><p>No one needs Apple either. </p>

          • glenn8878

            01 January, 2020 - 11:43 am

            <blockquote><em><a href="#508427">In reply to WP7Mango:</a></em></blockquote><p>No one needs a phone!!!</p>

  • Stooks

    31 December, 2019 - 6:04 pm

    <p>Yawn. What was the average selling price? </p><p><br></p><p>I remember when Samsung and Apple were battling it out in court and all those documents were released. The world found out that Samsung (the number one seller of smartphones at the time) had an average selling price of $65. So basically selling those Galaxy S7,8,9,10 etc by the carton and selling the $65 throw away Android junk phones by the millions.</p><p><br></p><p>I suspect that the Chinese governm….or….ummm…..Huawei does much of the same.</p>

    • Paul Thurrott

      Premium Member
      01 January, 2020 - 9:46 am

      Seems like high volume/low price is a great business model.

      • VancouverNinja

        Premium Member
        01 January, 2020 - 2:36 pm

        <blockquote><em><a href="#508422">In reply to paul-thurrott:</a></em></blockquote><p>”Sell to the classes, drink with the masses. Sell to the masses drink with the classes”</p>

      • xamzara

        02 January, 2020 - 5:19 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#508422">In reply to paul-thurrott:</a></em></blockquote><p><br></p><p>What kind of net margins Huawei has in their mobile business? </p><p><br></p><p>They are profitable, but by how much?</p><p><br></p><p>What about the ASP in their mobile business? </p><p><br></p><p>I would say that having a billion high income customers and totally owning your platform experience, as a certain Cupertino based company does, is a much better business model.</p><p><br></p><p>Last time I checked, Apple‘s annual Services revenue was roughly the same as Huawei’s entire consumer business (!) revenue.</p><p><br></p><p>Huawei doesn’t own their core technology (Android) and they don’t own or control the ecosystem in any way. </p><p><br></p><p>It’s Google who owns it and who also owns the customers and their data. Google also collects all the money from Play store.</p><p><br></p><p>Android is indeed a great business if you look at volumes, but it’s way more complex than that.</p>

        • wright_is

          Premium Member
          02 January, 2020 - 5:42 am

          <blockquote><em><a href="#508702">In reply to xamzara:</a></em></blockquote><p>I always find it interesting that people judge how well a company does not on its products or services, but on how much it can rip its customers off for.</p>

          • xamzara

            02 January, 2020 - 7:10 am

            <blockquote><em><a href="#508714">In reply to wright_is:</a></em></blockquote><p><br></p><p>I always find it amusing when people say Apple rips off their customers, not considering the product itself and the value it offers.</p><p><br></p><p>For each Apple product there are numerous (often cheaper) alternatives. </p><p><br></p><p>Yet people willingly spend their money on Apple products, again and again.</p><p><br></p><p>Price and value are separate things.</p><p><br></p><p>iPhone, for example, is actually pretty good value. Yes, the high end models are expensive, but with one battery swap you can use it for half a decade, always with the latest software.</p><p><br></p><p>The cost per year ends up being quite fair, actually. </p><p><br></p><p>(And yes, my four year old 6s runs iOS 13 perfectly fine.)</p><p><br></p><p>Also, the base model iPad is shockingly great value. There simply is no viable competition. The same can be said about the Watch. Even AirPods aren’t actually that pricey when compared to competition.</p><p><br></p><p>So much for ripping off people. </p>

            • wright_is

              Premium Member
              02 January, 2020 - 8:26 am

              <blockquote><em><a href="#508718">In reply to xamzara:</a></em></blockquote><p>You make my point for me. Just because Huawei isn't charging a fortune for its products doesn't mean it isn't a well run company or that its products aren't good.</p><p>You were quick to defend Apple, who I never mentioned, there are many companies with similar practices. But a company that is making good money and services billions of customers with cheap(er) and reliable products isn't considered successful, because its profit per customer is much lower.</p><p>The Apple products I purchased lost support much quicker than expected. I bought a 2007 iMac, which lost Apple support in 2014, the Microsoft Windows on it will get another update this month… The same for the Mac mini, it support. My 2010 Apple TV didn't even last that long, it was dropped from support after about a year or so. My iPhone 3GS faired a little better, but not great.</p><p>Most people I know buy under 250€ phone and expect it to last 7 years. They lose support quickly, but they continue to use it, until it breaks. It doesn't matter if the iPhone gets security updates for longer, if they can't afford it.</p>

              • xamzara

                02 January, 2020 - 1:55 pm

                <blockquote><em><a href="#508750">In reply to wright_is:</a></em></blockquote><p>I’m not saying that Huawei isn’t successful.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>(But we know little of Huawei’s real financials and the magnitude of Chinese state’s involvement regarding subsidies and so on.)</p><p><br></p><p>I was just saying that their business model (in mobiles) isn’t really that amazing.</p><p><br></p><p>Sell lots of cheap hardware built from commodity parts and commodity software at thin margins…but then what? It really isn’t very different from what PC OEMs do.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Apple on the other hand, sells lots (but not as many) of hardware at healthy margins to generally high income customers, who then also use (and pay for) Apple services / AppStore and buy additional “accessories” such as AirPods and Watches.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Apple has chosen very much an opposite business model – one which no one has been able to replicate and which (so far) has been incredibly successful.</p><p><br></p><p>It doesn’t matter if everybody can’t afford an iPhone. Apple is choosing their customers – as is Huawei.</p><p><br></p>

                • yangstax

                  03 January, 2020 - 10:12 pm

                  <blockquote>Huawei has just one businesss model – R&amp;D, R&amp;D, R&amp;D and until it becomes so scary. Among their 194K total employees, 96K are R&amp;D scientists and engineers. Huawei is an employee owned company and they are not working for stock holders. You have seen the results in recent years. Their R&amp;D expenses are higher than Apple and Intel combined. Can you blame them for trying to be good? Can't stop them, ban them. Trump figures out a way – 'national security' of course.</blockquote>

            • yangstax

              03 January, 2020 - 10:24 pm

              <p>For each $800 iPhone made, Chinese manufactures get $25, $375 for the phone parts and $400 for Apple and its shareholders. Trump claims that China is ripping off American. People still defends Apple. Sigh!</p>

  • SimJeff

    Premium Member
    01 January, 2020 - 8:57 am

    <p>When you travel outside of the states the advertising and use of <span style="background-color: rgb(245, 245, 245); color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Huawei products seems everywhere.</span></p><p><span style="background-color: rgb(245, 245, 245); color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> </span></p><p>If it is just a political pawn in the battle – it seems to be only an issue in one place.</p>

  • brduffy

    01 January, 2020 - 1:26 pm

    <p>This company gets an awful lot of attention on this site for a product that has less than 10% US Market share. I don't know anyone who uses their phones or laptops. Do we really care?</p>

    • lvthunder

      Premium Member
      01 January, 2020 - 2:23 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#508449">In reply to brduffy:</a></em></blockquote><p>Well this site's audience isn't 100% US based. Plus I think this company interests Paul because the US government is against it.</p>

      • Paul Thurrott

        Premium Member
        02 January, 2020 - 8:52 am

        This company interests Paul because they are the number two smartphone maker in the world and because they make the very best cameras in the smartphone market.

        That the US government is attacking them is interesting and weird. It would be just as interesting if it was Samsung. And less interesting if it was some company that doesn’t matter in my world.

    • wright_is

      Premium Member
      02 January, 2020 - 2:51 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#508449">In reply to brduffy:</a></em></blockquote><p>Given that it is the number 2 smartphone producer and is a leader in 5G technology, it certainly deserves its coverage. That it can reach the number 2 position in smartphone sales, without much impact on the US market says a lot for it.</p><p>Don't forget, a lot of readers here don't live in isolation in the USA, there is a large international audience. For us Huawei is very relevant.</p>

  • johnh3

    01 January, 2020 - 2:22 pm

    <p>Huawei phones are popular devices in Europe. But I think if the Android ban will not be solved other brand will take its place in 2020. Like Xiaomi, OnePlus Nokia etc..</p><p><br></p><p>And Samsung and Apple will remain the top seller.</p><p><br></p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC