The Hewlett Packard name

If I were CEO of PC hardware builder HP Inc. I would be looking to renegotiate the terms of the split.

It’s time for the hardware company to retake the ancestral name from those pretenders at HP Enterprise.

Conversation 15 comments

  • Paul Thurrott

    Premium Member
    25 February, 2018 - 9:18 am

    <p>I see HP like KFC, as a more modern name with no real connections to a past that doesn't matter to anyone anymore.</p>

    • jimchamplin

      Premium Member
      25 February, 2018 - 10:05 am

      <blockquote><a href="#248395"><em>In reply to paul-thurrott:</em></a></blockquote><p>Yeah, sadly it’s not far from the truth. I suppose if they’d felt there were any value in the name, they would have tried to keep it.</p>

    • skane2600

      25 February, 2018 - 4:39 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#248395"><em>In reply to paul-thurrott:</em></a></blockquote><p>Well KFC and AARP changed their original names because of negative connotations (i.e. unhealthy food and old folks respectively). HP never really had anything negative to overcome.</p><p><br></p><p>BTW, for Stranger Things fans: At a family dinner they referred to Kentucky Fried Chicken as "KFC", at a time (the 80s) when nobody called it that.</p>

      • hrlngrv

        Premium Member
        25 February, 2018 - 4:50 pm

        <p><a href="#248546"><em>In reply to skane2600:</em></a></p><p>Not the only anachronism in Stranger Things. The sherriff's deputies wear walkie-talkies with mics clipped onto shoulder straps. Those didn't exist in the 1980s either.</p>

      • Brett Barbier

        25 February, 2018 - 10:33 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#248546"><em>In reply to skane2600:</em></a></blockquote><p>KFC was commonly used well before they officially renamed the restaurants, which happened in1991. Maybe back well before the 80's. </p>

        • skane2600

          26 February, 2018 - 3:50 pm

          <blockquote><a href="#248600"><em>In reply to Brett_B:</em></a></blockquote><p>I never heard it used back in the 70s or 80s but perhaps you did.</p>

      • evox81

        Premium Member
        26 February, 2018 - 9:44 am

        <blockquote><a href="#248546"><em>In reply to skane2600:</em></a></blockquote><p>I don't know… "Hewlett Packard", while perhaps not exactly a negative, does have a bit of a stodgy/old feel to it. </p>

  • hrlngrv

    Premium Member
    25 February, 2018 - 3:32 pm

    <p>It hasn't really been Hewlett-Packard since it started making PCs.</p><p>Damn shame. When I was in college at the dawn of microcomputers, Hewlett-Packard made the best instrumentation equipment. Best oscilloscopes in electronics labs. Physics department labs used others, and they stunk in comparison. Hewlett-Packard graphical terminals (monochrome, maybe 6" x 6" and 480 x 480) were better than all but the highest end Tektronix ones.</p><p>IMO, Agilent Technologies deserves the full names, and neither HPQ nor HPE deserve anything more than alphabet soup.</p>

    • skane2600

      25 February, 2018 - 4:33 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#248516"><em>In reply to hrlngrv:</em></a></blockquote><p>"It hasn't really been Hewlett-Packard since it started making PCs."</p><p><br></p><p>Well, let's say that it hasn't been HP since they focused exclusively on PCs. The first IBM PC compatible computer from HP was in 1985 but Agilent wasn't spun off until 1999.</p><p><br></p><p>And who can forget the HP-150, HP's MS-DOS compatible touch screen computer in 1983.</p>

      • wright_is

        Premium Member
        29 March, 2019 - 6:12 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#248545">In reply to skane2600:</a></em></blockquote><p>My first real job out of college was programming a corporate reporting system, written in MS-BASIC, on HP 125 (Z80, CP/M), HP 150 (MS-DOS, touchscreen, not IBM compatible) and HP Vectra (MS-DOS, barely IBM compatible). The 150 I had even had the built-in thermal printer in the top of the monitor. But the touch never really worked reliably on the ones we had. And, of course, it was all connected to an HP 3000.</p><p>And the prices! They made original IBM kit look cheap!</p><p>I can remember a 386 Vectra, with 20MB HDD cost around 4,000UKP by the time you had added a keyboard, mouse and monochrome display. (1988/1989)</p><p>The system had been written by Fortran programmers and maintained by COBOL programmers, none of whom, it seemed, had ever heard of BASIC, let alone read the programming manual. No For…Next or While…Wend loops, just:</p><p>20 LET A = 1</p><p>30 &lt;do something&gt;</p><p>40 LET A = A + 1:IF A &lt; 50 GO TO 30</p><p>I can still remember the last day of a project in Ilford, the client took us out to lunch, "forced" 3 pints of bitter down my throat and my boss had a 2 hour meeting with the client manager, before we drove back home (I was the passenger) . To fill in the time waiting, I wrote a quick-and-dirty version of Breakout to keep me amused, sitting in my small corner of the office on the HP 125.</p>

        • navarac

          29 March, 2019 - 7:27 am

          <blockquote><em><a href="#416331">In reply to wright_is:</a></em></blockquote><p>COBOL ….. now there's a memory.</p>

  • Rycott

    Premium Member
    25 February, 2018 - 5:21 pm

    <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Hewlett-Packard is wordy. I much prefer HP.</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">It also means they have a nice compact logo for their devices.</span></p>

    • jean

      26 February, 2018 - 5:09 am

      <blockquote><a href="#248555"><em>In reply to Rycott:</em></a></blockquote><p>HPTCFKABNTBCW Hewlett-Packard</p><p>HP the company formerly know as but not to be confused with Hewlett-Packard</p><p><br></p>

  • minke

    29 March, 2019 - 7:08 am

    <p>In the past people who created companies took great pride in their accomplishments and wanted the company to be a reflection of their values, etc. They stood behind their brand, so they used their own names. Today, every start-up is already scheming how they will build it up for a few years then sell it off so they can move on to the next get-rich-quick scheme. You often see this reflected in the company values too. Also, with this build-it and dump-it quick mentality you don't want your name attached to the inevitable failures.</p>

  • waethorn

    04 April, 2019 - 12:27 pm

    <p>Hewlett-Packard existed at a time with Packard-Bell (no relation).</p><p><br></p><p>Neither company exists anymore.</p><p><br></p><p>Acer runs Packard-Bell as a defunct division servicing EMEA, like they did with Gateway, and the new HP is HP Inc and HPE.</p><p><br></p><p>HP is not Hewlett-Packard, much like ZDnet has nothing to do with Ziff-Davis.</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC