https://www.theguardian.com/help/insideguardian/2017/nov/23/retiring-the-guardian-app-for-windows-10-phone-and-desktop
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#220413"><em>In reply to Jules_Wombat:</em></a></blockquote><p>IMO, there was never a compelling reason for metro/modern/UWP apps to exist other than to promote MS's mobile products. On a non-mobile platform, the browser is more than adequate. It's on mobile where the browser experience sucks so that apps are important. The Guardian doesn't make a MacOS app for exactly the same reason it won't make a UWP app for the desktop – it's simply not needed.</p>
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#220274"><em>In reply to FalseAgent:</em></a></blockquote><p>To a great extent that's exactly what happened, just not on MS's mobile platform due to its tiny market share. The story didn't say anything about the Guardian dropping their iOS or Android app in favor of the mobile web.</p>
Luis_Sohal
<p>Call on &&**866).(877).(9859)__++</p><p>#Outlook Support Number</p><p>#Micrsosoft Support Number</p><p>#Outlook Password </p><p>#OutlookSupport </p><p>#HotmailPasswordRecovery</p><p>#OutlookandMicrosoft Support Phone Number</p><p>Call ***866).(877).(9859>>></p><p>outlooksupport.net</p><p><br></p>
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#220564"><em>In reply to rob_segal:</em></a></blockquote><p>I guess my perspective is different. I couldn't care less about "major" apps on any mobile platform because the mobile experience is almost always inadequate. What I miss on my WP is commercial apps from airlines, restaurants etc. Those apps are fairly simple so the mobile compromise is less of an issue. Those kind of mobile apps are important to me because the mobile browser experience is also inadequate. </p>