It’s Official: Call of Duty to Return to its World War II Roots

Posted on April 22, 2017 by Paul Thurrott in Games, Xbox One with 11 Comments

It's Official: Call of Duty to Return to its World War II Roots

The rumors are true: Call of Duty will return to its World War II roots with the next installment of this best-selling game series, called Call of Duty: WWII.

“This year, Sledgehammer Games joins the WWII ranks ofCall of Duty with Call of Duty: WWII, which will bring the series back to World War II after nearly ten years,” the Activision announcement notes. “We can’t wait to tell you more about Call of Duty: WWII, so be sure not to miss the reveal livestream at 10:00 am Pacific on April 26.”

For those not fully immersed in the history of Call of Duty, the first three major games in the series—Call of Duty, Call of Duty 2, and Call of Duty 3—were all set in World War II, as was the fifth, Call of Duty: World at War. These games were all excellent in their day, but subsequent series likeModern Warfare and Black Ops pushed Call of Duty to new heights, at least from sales and multiplayer perspectives.

More recent titles, especially last year’s Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare, seem to have left some fans behind, however. Despite still being the best-selling game of the year, Infinite Warfare is considered a failure in the context of Call of Duty. So Activision is pushing reset. Again.

Which is sort of the issue. Over the course of several games—Call of Duty: Ghosts, Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare, and Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare—Activision has struggled to find the foundation for a new series that can rival Modern Warfare or Black Ops.

The thing is, World War II is not the answer.

As with last year’s blockbuster Battlefield comeback, Battlefield 1—which features a World War I setting and very strong single player campaign—Activision is not surprisingly plumbing its past, and nostalgia, in an effort to regain the support of its biggest fans. But it’s biggest fans want more Modern Warfare or Black Ops multiplayer mayhem. Not this. Not really.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m intrigued. I will happily queue up, virtually, to get this game on day one. But it’s hard to believe that WWII can be the start of a successful new series for Call of Duty.


Tagged with

Join the discussion!


Don't have a login but want to join the conversation? Become a Thurrott Premium or Basic User to participate

Comments (11)

11 responses to “It’s Official: Call of Duty to Return to its World War II Roots”

  1. SherlockHolmes

    I dont get it. Why are Americans so addictive to war games?

  2. red.radar

    I remember when Return to Castle Wolfenstein and the original call of duty launched. WW2 based and I really liked it. I am intrigued. If they make it so you can experience historical aspects of WW2 battles then I think it will be successful. If it's just modern warfare with period weapons I am not certain it will be successful. It needs to differentiate somehow.

  3. Bart

    This is all I wanted. So excited about this. Boots on the ground.

    Am hoping it can bring the real atmosphere of WWII.

    "But it’s biggest fans want more Modern Warfare or Black Ops multiplayer mayhem. Not this. Not really." - What is this based on Paul?

  4. veermaharaj

    If they can manage to take it from a new angle there is the possibility of making a new franchise out of this.

    But honestly, this is Activision Marketing reaping what they sow.

    When the first Modern Warfare was going to be release, it was actually titled "Modern Warfare" but at the last minute marketing said to slap COD in the name to get more sales. I mean technically it worked, but if they hadn't they would have had a separate franchise apart from the original WW2 COD titles. If they had named Call of Duty Black Ops, just "Black Ops" they would have had a 3rd franchise.

    As it is, they just have one franchise a lot of people are just exhausted with. They are struggling to come up with new interesting stories and worse, the multiplayer hasn't really done anything groundbreaking since COD4 MW.

    The multiplayer needs to become a subscription service, and the campaigns need to become wholly an exercise in good storytelling (not for $60.00)

  5. MadGator

    Leave the Campaigns for Donald and Hillary.

    I'm sick of hearing politicians blather about their Call of Duty.

    Battlefield 1's multiplayer action is where it's at!