Google Could Be Facing a New Antitrust Investigation in the U.S.

Google could soon find itself in another antitrust probe. The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday evening that the Department of Justice in the United States is preparing an antitrust investigation against the search engine giant.

Following WSJ’s report, The New York Times reported that a new antitrust task force at the FTC has referred complaints about Google to the DOJ, leading to the Justice Department preparing a new antitrust investigation against the company.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The latest antitrust probe against Google focuses on the company’s advertising and search business, which is how it makes most of its money.

This wouldn’t be the first time Google has faced an antitrust investigation from the U.S. government. Back in 2013, the company reached a settlement with the FTC the commission raised concerns about Google’s abuse of power in the market. This would, however, be the first antitrust case against a big tech company during the Trump admission. With the recent calls to break up big tech companies like Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft, this new antitrust case against Google could be crucial for some in the 2020 presidential run.

The United States isn’t the only place Google is being investigated, however. Google is being investigated in Ireland over suspected infringement of the GDPR privacy laws, and it was only hit with a $5 billion antitrust fine over Android back in 2018.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 18 comments

  • Bats

    01 June, 2019 - 9:58 am

    <p>This is perfectly fine with me. I am a big fan of Google, however, they have gotten to big, powerful, and arrogant. Not just that, but they are run by a bunch of socialist dreamers, who believe they are doing good. I believe, that they believe that. That's a problem. Because Google controls Search, they control how information is given and that's a huge problem. Because other search engines have failed miserably (both in function and marketing), like Bing, Yahoo, etc…. to compete with Google, and thus we are in this predicament. </p><p><br></p><p>To be honest, I don't care about the advertising unless we are talking politics. However, for the search….that's another issue. For me, I have no problem with it, because I know the fake news from the real news. It's why I am always on the right side of everything. However, for those others who don't know any better….that's a problem. It's just too bad the free market doesn't know how to keep them in check.</p><p><br></p><p>Like I said, for the advertising…I don't care because of the privacy options made available. Plus great things don't come free, and their products and services are great. Someone has to pay for it and I don't mind paying Google with my personal info. </p><p><br></p><p>However, like I said, the search sector in their business is the dangerous one. This is why I am advocate for regulating the internet. It's becoming too much of a problem that these companies are just too big , to the point where their platforms have become the standard. After all, I get upset when I read about Twitter bans or when fake news is part of Google Search results. The biggest jokes I read was when Facebook said that they were combatting fake news on their platform with Snopes. LOL….that was a joke. Also when, Google said that they were going to work with the New York Times and other sources for news gathering….that was a joke too. That's because news outlets such as NYT, CNN, etc…. are all famously biased and always wrong. </p><p><br></p><p>I hope this goes anti-trust probe happens. I think at the end it's going to end in a settlement, but hopefully Google and their (dumb) low level employees will get the message and we can see some regulation on the internet on the US side of the world.</p>

    • SvenJ

      01 June, 2019 - 11:33 am

      <p>Wow.</p><p><em>News outlets such as NYT, CNN, etc…. (and </em><em style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Snopes) </em><em> are all famously biased and always wrong. </em><em style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">I am always on the right side of everything.</em><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">&nbsp;</span></p><p class="ql-indent-1"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">I am surprised you didn't post a link to your Blog/Website so we all can benefit from your unbiased and factual reporting of the news, or opinion for that matter. What else could we need?</span></p><p><em style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">This is why I am advocate for regulating the internet. </em></p><p class="ql-indent-1"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">And the government(s) should be in charge of that, because, after all, they are the poster child for fairness, efficiency, and fiscal responsibility, having nothing but the best interests </span>of the world at heart.</p><p><br></p>

    • curtisspendlove

      01 June, 2019 - 2:36 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#432355">In reply to Bats:</a></em></blockquote><p><em>…because I know the fake news from the real news…</em></p><p><br></p><p>Well, at least you're humble in your opinions. That's the important thing.</p>

    • karlinhigh

      Premium Member
      01 June, 2019 - 4:11 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#432355">In reply to Bats:</a></em></blockquote><p>Surely this is satire?</p>

    • jimchamplin

      Premium Member
      01 June, 2019 - 6:06 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#432355"><em>In reply to Bats:</em></a><em> </em>It's why I am always on the right side of everything.</blockquote><p><em>That’s RICH!</em></p><p><br></p><p>Also, the day I’m okay with regulating the internet is the day I die. We need a MORE wild system. One where companies can’t survive and the hackers make us free again. </p>

    • Ron Diaz

      01 June, 2019 - 7:02 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#432355">In reply to Bats:</a></em></blockquote><p>I can see now that Bats is short for Batsh*t crazy</p>

  • BoItmanLives

    01 June, 2019 - 12:52 pm

    <p>Lol the Department of Justice is such an ironic name under this current administration (lack of). </p><p><br></p><p>This sounds more like a shakedown by Drumpf cronies looking for a fat bribe check.</p><p><br></p>

    • Greg Green

      02 June, 2019 - 11:21 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#432367">In reply to BoItmanLives:</a></em></blockquote><p>So spying on poltical opposition, as Obama did, isn’t a big deal? How Orwellian of you.</p>

    • lvthunder

      Premium Member
      03 June, 2019 - 10:55 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#432367">In reply to BoItmanLives:</a></em></blockquote><p>Of course you offer no proof to your claims.</p>

  • kevinfanch

    01 June, 2019 - 3:47 pm

    <p>Google has became a monopoly in the mobile OS sphere (if you don't count Apple). It's time to stop letting them collect our private data and using it. This is why I switched to /e/ , it is Google-less Android. I've been using it for 3 months and it works well.</p><p>Check e.foundation</p>

    • lvthunder

      Premium Member
      03 June, 2019 - 10:54 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#432374">In reply to kevinfanch:</a></em></blockquote><p>But you have to count Apple. You can't say Google has a smartphone monopoly of Android devices. </p>

  • skane2600

    01 June, 2019 - 8:15 pm

    <p>There are legitimate reasons for the government to look at Google from an antitrust POV, but with this Administration, one wonders if the motivation is because of their imaginary belief that tech companies are censoring legitimate conservative voices (note that I said <em>legitimate </em>I'm not talking about Alex Jones et al.).</p>

    • Daekar

      02 June, 2019 - 8:43 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#432391">In reply to skane2600:</a></em></blockquote><p>So you've already decided that Alex doesn't have freedom of speech, then, because you don't like him. Interesting. </p>

      • George Rae

        03 June, 2019 - 9:11 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#432444">In reply to Daekar:</a></em></blockquote><p>Of course Alex Jones has freedom of speech, just as a private company has freedom to not give him a megaphone in their products. Why is that so hard to understand for some? </p>

        • lvthunder

          Premium Member
          03 June, 2019 - 10:52 am

          <blockquote><em><a href="#432640">In reply to Sectime:</a></em></blockquote><p>Then that company should have clear policies as to what is allowed and what is not and have those policies applied equally to both sides of the political spectrum. So much of our debates happen on these services these days that they have become the town square.</p>

    • Greg Green

      02 June, 2019 - 11:20 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#432391">In reply to skane2600:</a></em></blockquote><p>It’s not imaginary. And Twitter just censored a bunch of anti government types in China as the anniversary of Tianamen approaches. Or is that imaginary too?</p>

  • dontbe evil

    02 June, 2019 - 2:53 am

    <p>finally</p>

  • techguy33

    02 June, 2019 - 4:17 pm

    <p>Political theater with a wink and slap on the wrist to give 2020 candidates fake street cred that they're reigning in the rogue tech behemoths. Bottom line this a joke and nothing will change with Google</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC