Google Hardware to be Carbon Neutral by 2020

Today, Google committed to making the delivery of its hardware products to and from customers carbon neutral by 2020. And it says that “100 percent” of these products will include recycled materials by 2022.

“We’ve been making consumer hardware like Pixel phones and Google Home Minis for just over three years now,” Google’s Anna Meegan writes. “But building these devices, getting them into the hands of our customers, and disposing of our old electronics can create significant waste.”

The goal, Google says, is to maximize recycled content wherever possible.

“Some people think design is about making things look pretty or look good,” Google hardware design lead Ivy Ross told Fast Company. “And really design is about solving problems for humanity. I said to the team, wait a minute, [sustainability] is just another problem and is probably the most important problem of our lifetime. Won’t we feel great as designers if we are taking that on?”

Google isn’t the first device maker to attempt such a change: Apple, which sells far more hardware than Google, has promoted its use of recycled materials for years.

“We are a young hardware brand,” Meegan said. “And we are looking at this opportunity as a perfect time for us to make a stand and bring something to what we believe customers want in the marketplace. This is something that people want as customers; it’s something that people want as Googlers. It aligns to our broader company culture around thinking about the big unsolved problems of our time. So this is something that we feel is the right thing to do. And really the right time to do it.”

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 20 comments

  • MrKirbs

    Premium Member
    05 August, 2019 - 2:23 pm

    <p>This is certainly a novel way for Google to announce that they're shutting down their hardware business</p>

  • Daekar

    05 August, 2019 - 2:44 pm

    <p>The fine print makes this a far cry from fully carbon neutral… Oh well, baby steps.</p><p><br></p><p>Wouldn't it be nice if the battery were user-serviceable and the devices weren't glued together? I bet that would make them better for the environment too… just saying.</p>

  • Bats

    05 August, 2019 - 3:29 pm

    <p>LOL…nice, but it's not going to do anything. </p><p><br></p><p>All this environment stuff was warned 20-30 years ago. Alot of action started happening during the Clinton Administration. Technologies were developed to cut down on use and dependency of fossil fuels and other things. World wide environmental organizations were formed to promote global legislation and practice to "help" the environment. Like I said, this has been going on since the father of the internet (Al Gore) was VP of ther US. And people want to tell us, that after ALL THAT ACTION, the environment hasn't improved a little bit? Google is a great company, but this carbon thing of Google's is not going to do a thing at all. </p><p><br></p><p>Especially when you have the Google Execs and Hollywood flying private jets around the world like it's their aerial bicycle.</p>

    • PeteB

      05 August, 2019 - 3:40 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#447466"><em>In reply to Bats:</em></a><em> Hurr durr but this by itself won't solve climate change</em></blockquote><p><br></p><p>Way to utterly miss the forest, brains.</p>

    • codymesh

      05 August, 2019 - 4:40 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#447466">In reply to Bats:</a></em></blockquote><p>let me guess…you're a boomer</p>

      • skane2600

        06 August, 2019 - 10:39 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#447478">In reply to codymesh:</a></em></blockquote><p>No idea if Bats is a boomer or not but it's dangerous to make assumptions about what a particular generation believes whether we are talking boomers or millennials. There's no "generation-think" anyway.</p>

    • skane2600

      06 August, 2019 - 10:41 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#447466">In reply to Bats:</a></em></blockquote><p>The question is not only if the environment has improved due to actions taken to benefit it, but whether it would be even in worse shape had those actions not been taken.</p>

  • PeteB

    05 August, 2019 - 3:34 pm

    <p>Step in the right direction.</p>

  • lvthunder

    Premium Member
    05 August, 2019 - 3:46 pm

    <p>The title and what they appear to be doing are not the same thing. In my mind at least if a product is going to be carbon neutral then it should be made in a factory that is carbon neutral and then delivered that way as well. I'm actually surprised not all of these products use at least something that is recycled now instead of waiting for 3 years to do that. At least the box and all the packing material should be made out of recycled stuff at this point.</p>

    • christian.hvid

      05 August, 2019 - 4:29 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#447470">In reply to lvthunder:</a></em></blockquote><p>The announcement could be a bit clearer about the difference between carbon neutrality and recycling. Both are good, of course, but they're not the same thing. Since there is no way to manufacture and transport stuff with zero emissions, carbon neutrality is generally taken to mean carbon compensation. In other words, for every ton of CO2 that is emitted as a result of Google's hardware business, they need to cut emissions by at least a ton somewhere else in order to stay carbon neutral.</p>

      • karlinhigh

        Premium Member
        05 August, 2019 - 4:39 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#447475"><em>In reply to christian.hvid:</em></a><em> Since there is no way to manufacture and transport stuff with zero emissions</em></blockquote><p>Hydro power and sailing ships, maybe!</p>

  • karlinhigh

    Premium Member
    05 August, 2019 - 3:52 pm

    <p><em>"…disposing of our old electronics can create significant waste."</em></p><p><br></p><p>Are they doing anything to need electronics disposed less often, such as having user-replaceable batteries and good repairability?</p>

    • lvthunder

      Premium Member
      05 August, 2019 - 4:28 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#447471">In reply to karlinhigh:</a></em></blockquote><p>Most of these devices are obsoleted by the company before the battery needs to be replaced.</p>

      • wright_is

        Premium Member
        06 August, 2019 - 3:09 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#447473">In reply to lvthunder:</a></em></blockquote><p>Agreed, it needs to introduce longer life cycles for its products. Most people I know use their smartphones for 4 or 5 years, yet most manufacturers give a maximum of 2 – 3 years of support.</p><p>My daughter's boyfriend is still using an iPhone 4S, for example.</p>

        • karlinhigh

          Premium Member
          06 August, 2019 - 9:32 am

          <blockquote><a href="#447529"><em>In reply to wright_is:</em></a><em> My daughter's boyfriend is still using an iPhone 4S</em></blockquote><p>To me, that sounds like a point in his favor. :)</p>

  • Stooks

    05 August, 2019 - 6:58 pm

    <p>Lol. It is made in China right? You know either #1 or #2 behind India as the leaders in world pollution. </p><p><br></p><p>Pure PR BS image spin. Especially since the owners cruise around the globe in their Boing 767. </p>

  • Pbike908

    05 August, 2019 - 11:07 pm

    <p>Apple and now Google love to tout this in their PR. Left out is Apple 's and Google's most profitable customers are folks with BIGGEST carbon footprints on the planet — Rich folks!</p>

  • Rob_Wade

    06 August, 2019 - 9:48 am

    <p>LOL. I just don't care about this garbage. I'm tired of all the hyperbole over "carbon footprints". I'll darn well do what I want to do, and I'll buy whomever gives me the value I am looking for. I'll happily continue to drive my 8 cylinder sports car and SUV.</p>

    • bluvg

      07 August, 2019 - 9:45 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#447561">In reply to Rob_Wade:</a></em></blockquote><p>If only we had a whole planet full of people that don't care about anyone else.</p>

  • mikes_infl

    06 August, 2019 - 3:42 pm

    <p>3R's = Reduce, Reuse, Recycle</p><p>I don't believe the hype they're spewing because they really aren't doing what it sounds like they're saying.</p><p>Anybody else notice that they're talking about the "DELIVERY" of those products?</p><p><br></p><p>They ARE addressing a very important part of capitalism existing within an era of environmental activism: Hitting all the talking points.</p><p><br></p><p>Large corporations that really want to become involved in the attempts to reduce their impact on others in the world need to start hiring Systems Sustainability Engineers. People that understand the concept of systems engineering and the ENTIRE path their products take from raw materials past the EOL and into the product reincarnation. Otherwise, it's just lip service.</p>


Stay up to date with the latest tech news from!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2023 BWW Media Group