Google Profits Decline by 23 Percent

Google’s parent company, Alphabet, posted net income of $7 billion on revenues of $40.5 billion for the quarter ending September 30. Revenues gained by 20 percent, but that net income figure represents a 23 percent decline year-over-year (YOY).

“I am extremely pleased with the progress we made across the board in the third quarter, from our recent advancements in search and quantum computing to our strong revenue growth driven by mobile search, YouTube and Cloud,” Google CEO Sundar Pichai said in a prepared statement. “We’re focused on providing the most helpful services to our users and partners, and we see many opportunities ahead.”

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

As always, Google represented the lion’s share of Alphabet’s profits and revenues, with the firm’s “other bets” coasting to yet another loss, this time of $941 billion. That shortfall is almost certainly why Alphabet’s overall profits were down. (Update: Google later said it was increased R&D spending. –Paul) And as always, advertising revenue contributed most of Google’s revenues; advertising represented about 85 percent of Google’s total revenues.

Google also posted $6.4 billion in “other revenues” related to its Pixel phones, Play Store, and enterprise cloud products. That’s a big gain over the $4.6 billion it contributed a year earlier.

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 21 comments

  • Danny Riley

    Premium Member
    28 October, 2019 - 5:10 pm

    <p>Other bets loss was $941 million, not $941 billion. :)</p>

  • Stooks

    28 October, 2019 - 5:14 pm

    <p>Google is the most fragile of the big tech companies. With 85% coming from one product they could nose dive very easily.</p><p><br></p><p>With 99% of the public detesting ads and the rise of the ad blockers, plus more and more awareness of privacy, Google is not the shinny star it used to be.</p><p><br></p><p>I only use YouTube, signed in with a NON Google account. In a really rare moment I might use Google maps and only from a computer.</p>

    • lvthunder

      Premium Member
      29 October, 2019 - 10:55 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#484220">In reply to Stooks:</a></em></blockquote><p>Being signed into YouTube it is a Google account. Just because you aren't using a gmail email to sign in it is still a Google account.</p>

  • Lordbaal

    28 October, 2019 - 5:26 pm

    <p>They still made ‭$6,999,950,000‬ more then I did.</p>

    • hrlngrv

      Premium Member
      28 October, 2019 - 6:17 pm

      <p><a href="; target="_blank"><em>In reply to Lordbaal:</em></a></p><p><strong><em>than</em></strong> you did. You'd be surprised hoe much using correct words would boost your earning power.</p>

      • Lordbaal

        28 October, 2019 - 6:24 pm

        <blockquote><em><a href="#484238">In reply to hrlngrv:</a></em></blockquote><p>How, not hoe.</p><p>And you're talking about the difference between then and than.</p>

        • miamimauler

          28 October, 2019 - 11:38 pm

          <blockquote><em><a href="#484239">In reply to Lordbaal:</a></em></blockquote><p>I'm sure that was deliberate. At least I hope it was or he must be feeling rather foolish.</p>

      • Greg Green

        29 October, 2019 - 8:11 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#484238">In reply to hrlngrv:</a></em></blockquote><p>Maybe he failed to finish the sentence. Google made more money then I washed the car.</p>

    • ym73

      29 October, 2019 - 12:27 am

      <blockquote><a href="#484224"><em>In reply to Lordbaal</em></a></blockquote><blockquote><em>Google is owned by thousands of people. You need to divide the net income by all those owners. Of course some of those owners own a bigger slice of the pie than others.</em></blockquote>

    • codymesh

      29 October, 2019 - 7:12 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#484224">In reply to Lordbaal:</a></em></blockquote><p>why yes your income should absolutely be compared to a company that has a monopoly in online search, advertising, and video.</p>

  • Thom77

    28 October, 2019 - 6:42 pm

    <p>So what exactly are Alphebet's "other bets" that is "almost certainly" the cause of the decline? By the way Thurott, I will "almost certainly" pay you back that money I owe you. </p>

  • johnh3

    28 October, 2019 - 8:16 pm

    <p>I wonder how the Pixel sales are going? Still a very limited distribution compared to Microsoft Surface line. I expected to get Pixel 4 to Sweden and some other countries. But we are still left out.</p>

  • codymesh

    29 October, 2019 - 7:20 am

    <p>this kind of weirdness is par for the course for Google, but at least we now know that it's something at X that is costing them, not Google itself</p>

  • Greg Green

    29 October, 2019 - 8:14 am

    <p>Is advertising income down? I read somewhere some major businesses aren’t seeing a return on their advertising run by google.</p>

  • RonV42

    Premium Member
    29 October, 2019 - 9:51 am

    <p>Google is very exposed because of the majority of their revenue comes from Advertising. And with all the privacy initiatives, ad blockers, tracking stripping, right to be forgotten and other regulations from various governments they will continue to be at risk. </p>

  • lvthunder

    Premium Member
    29 October, 2019 - 10:56 am

    <p>Wow a 23% decline. That's huge. Is it just Google down that much or is it most of the tech sector.</p>

  • eric_rasmussen

    Premium Member
    29 October, 2019 - 12:32 pm

    <p>I can't imagine the investments they're making in quantum are cheap. It's a big bet with a potentially huge pay out. I'm glad they're taking it on, I think Google has a chance to change the computing landscape forever. I also like Facebook's research divisions; some of the programming super heroes from my childhood work there now. Their investments into Oculus are terrific – I love my Oculus Quest more than most other entertainment devices in my home.</p><p><br></p><p>Microsoft's Research used to be pretty incredible, coming up with tech a decade ahead of its time. I don't know if that is still a thing at Microsoft or not, but we never seem to hear much from then. With all the Windows 10 problems we've faced over the past few years, I really wish Midori had been given a chance!</p>

  • MikeGalos

    29 October, 2019 - 12:51 pm

    <p>So, combining the 20% increased revenue and 23% decreased net income works out to net income dropping from roughly 27% of revenue down to 17% of revenue. That's a 36% drop and either a pretty massive change in their business model or some serious unplanned losses.</p><p><br></p><p>Anyone know about how Alphabet positioned this in their advice statements and their quarterly earnings call?</p>

  • Jeffsters

    29 October, 2019 - 7:18 pm

    <p>Apple…oh, wait, I mean Google is doomed! Doomed I tell you!</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC