Premature Regulation: DOJ to File Antitrust Charges Against Google

The U.S. Department of Justice has been ordered by Attorney General William Barr to file antitrust charges against Google as soon as this month, despite warnings from the over 40 lawyers developing the case that they need more time. That’s according to a new report in The New York Times, which cites several sources.

Here’s what’s happening: Lawyers at the DOJ feel that they have a “strong” antitrust case against Google, but they would like several more months to develop the case. But with the U.S. election in just two months, there’s a chance that the current administration, and Mr. Barr, will be pushed out and that the next administration will get credit for the Google case. So Barr wants to make sure it’s filed well before the election.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Interestingly, the Google case has broad bipartisan support, with all 50 U.S. states supporting it; some states may ultimately join the DOJ in its case, while others may go after Google independently or in partnership with a group of states.

The case centers on two commingled aspects of Google’s business: Its dominance of both online search and online advertising. Google controls over 90 percent of online searches and is extending its monopoly on mobile via Android and a deal with Apple. Google also earns $1 out of every $3 made via advertising online, and the DOJ has found “powerful evidence” of anticompetitive practices aimed at keeping both businesses dominant.

With regard to the timing, the lawyers have raised a number of issues. There are disagreements about how broad the complaint should be, what Google should be forced to do to resolve its illegal business practices, and even general tactics. Several lawyers said they would not sign an early filing against Google, and several have already left the case in protest of the “arbitrary” schedule change.

Aside from the obvious partisan nature of the schedule change, the bigger issue is that filing early could harm the government’s case and strengthen Google’s defense. And many of the lawyers involved with the case think it’s far too important—a so-called “case of the century,” akin to the breakup of Standard Oil—to screw it up. They’re also leery of the U.S. falling further behind the EU in antitrust enforcement.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 20 comments

  • Paul Thurrott

    Premium Member
    04 September, 2020 - 12:41 pm

    <p>There's nothing objectionable or incorrect in this article, and there's certainly no political bias. No need to comment on this or the article if that's all you care about.</p>

  • scovious

    04 September, 2020 - 12:57 pm

    <p>The rampant actions of Google have been plainly anti-competitive for years, so perhaps the strong public opinion against their App Store or advertising domination have finally reached a breaking point. I've lost count of all the different inquiries, legal cases and complaints from their partners/competitors. From an outsider's perspective, if the US courts found Google guilty before the EU courts did, that would give the USA a much needed moral win on the global stage. </p>

    • nbplopes

      05 September, 2020 - 12:28 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#567677">In reply to scovious:</a></em></blockquote><p><br></p><p>Not really. There is little moral in speeding up the justice system and a weak resolution for self election objectives. That is called corruption of the democratic principles.</p>

  • sykeward

    04 September, 2020 - 4:54 pm

    <p>I think it's gross that seemingly every non-political topic/opinion/hobby/method of cooking bacon has been politicized to the core. But if you dare report anything that demonstrates political intrusion into something that should be settled (<em>like that bacon is best cooked in the oven</em>) the braying from people that results is like you physically jabbed them with a sharp stick. I'm sorry, Paul, that it's something you have to deal with so directly now.</p><p><br></p><p>It's like some kind of horrible feedback loop with no escape because everything, including attempts by people to avoid politics, is viewed as a political statement. Pandemic of the mind.</p>

  • jimchamplin

    Premium Member
    04 September, 2020 - 5:13 pm

    <p>I think at this point Dan Fielding from Night Court could get a conviction against El Goog. Not sure if moving up the schedule is going to matter that much.</p>

    • wright_is

      Premium Member
      05 September, 2020 - 7:26 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#567876">In reply to jimchamplin:</a></em></blockquote><p>It does if it means they have to cut corners on the evidence gathering and wording on the docket isn't watertight. </p><p>If they screw it up now, all the work will have been for nothing. </p><p>That is what I hate about US politics especially, although the UK isn't much better. It is irrelevant whether the right thing is done, the only thing that matters is who gets credit, even if they risk screwing it up by rushing it through. </p>

  • illuminated

    04 September, 2020 - 5:25 pm

    <p>If lawyers say it is too early then it must be too early. It would be crazy to lose just because somebody set unrealistic deadline. Maybe appearing tough on Google is more important than doing something meaningful.</p><p><br></p>

    • proftheory

      Premium Member
      04 September, 2020 - 6:35 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#567877">In reply to illuminated:</a></em></blockquote><p>What's worse than loosing is getting a partial victory and not being able to get the remedies they are looking for.</p>

      • Paul Thurrott

        Premium Member
        05 September, 2020 - 9:36 am

        Right. This is my concern as well. If you’re going to do this, you do it right.

    • nbplopes

      05 September, 2020 - 12:25 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#567877">In reply to illuminated:</a></em></blockquote><p><br></p><p>Election time.</p>

    • sscywong

      06 September, 2020 - 4:00 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#567877">In reply to illuminated:</a></em></blockquote><p><br></p><p>You've got the point. Very likely that appearing tough on face then let the case being dismissed in the court is exactly what they want to do now</p>

    • Greg Green

      07 September, 2020 - 9:26 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#567877">In reply to illuminated:</a></em></blockquote><p>While bad cases make bad law, to have to wait several more months (6? 8? 10?) seems like they’re manufacturing a case rather than prosecuting one.</p><p><br></p><p>Maybe google can make some friendly contributions to the senate and house and resolve this misunderstanding.</p>

  • Markus Mobius

    04 September, 2020 - 10:27 pm

    <p>The advertising dimension was a complete sideshow in the EU investigation and there was a fine for past not current behavior. The search remedies in the EU were also fairly mild.</p><p><br></p><p>The EU's antitrust investigation are traditionally much harsher than the US. Moreover, Google has a 90+ market share in the EU while there is more competition from Bing and Amazon in the US.</p><p><br></p><p>So I would be surprised if there is any big case against Google in the US. There is an anti-tech backlash and this case is mostly political theater.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>

    • wright_is

      Premium Member
      05 September, 2020 - 7:28 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#568751">In reply to Markus_Mobius:</a></em></blockquote><p>Which EU case? There are something like a dozen investigations into different parts of Google's business practices. </p>

      • Markus Mobius

        05 September, 2020 - 4:54 pm

        <blockquote><em><a href="#569000">In reply to wright_is:</a></em></blockquote><p>The advertising, android and search cases are completed and in litigation now.</p>

  • jchampeau

    Premium Member
    05 September, 2020 - 12:46 pm

    <p>"Premature Regulation" earns a spot on the top 10 list of best Paul Thurrott headlines of all time.</p>

    • Paul Thurrott

      Premium Member
      05 September, 2020 - 2:27 pm

      🙂

  • melinau

    Premium Member
    08 September, 2020 - 10:32 am

    <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Trump's apparent antipathy to Big Tech has always seemed odd to me given that most of the owners are also self-styled Rightist 'Libertarians'. </span>A cynic might suppose the haste is intended to show Trump fighting 'Big Tech' while actually undermining the case andor minimising punishment should that happen. </p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC