With its eye on Appleās appeal of a nearly-identical case, Google this week counter-sued Epic Games for bypassing its in-app payment system. Yes. Google has to copy everything Apple does.
āFar from generating anticompetitive harm, Android and Google Play bring enormous benefits to developers and users, and they do so at zero cost to users and minimal cost to developers in the vast majority of cases,ā Googleās suit notes. āEpicās suit threatens to undermine, rather than enhance, the very competition that has brought these benefits.ā
Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday ā and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!
"*" indicates required fields
As a reminder, Epic Games modified its game Fortnite to bypass the anticompetitive in-app payment systems that both Apple and Google require of apps in their respective mobile stores. As a result, Apple booted Fortnite out of the iOS App Store and suspended Epicās developer account. And Google being Google, it copied Apple and did the same, but with its Play Store for Android. So Epic sued Apple. And then it sued Google too.
The case against Apple already went to court, and Judge Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers issued a split ruling in which Epic won one of the most important elements of its case—forcing Apple to let developers communicate with their own customers—and alerting Epic that perhaps if it supplies more evidence—hint, hint—she could even label Apple a monopoly on appeal and impose stricter punishments against the company. Apple, naturally, called it a āresounding victoryā before appealing the case itself.
Epic v. Google hasnāt yet gone to court, but this weekās counter-suit raises the stakes in a similar fashion. But Googleās arguments are just as specious as Appleās, and despite the faux openness of Android, the online giant may have an even more problematic defense to mount since there is a lot of evidence that it has struck sweetheart deals with hardware makers to force them to only provide access to Google Play Store and its singular in-app payment system. Google also forced OnePlus, a relatively small player, to drop its Epic Games partnership that would have seen Fortnite bundled on its phones.
āGoogle seeks restitution of any such amounts by which Epic has been unjustly enriched at Googleās expense,ā the countersuit adds, somewhat hilariously. āGoogle seeks and is entitled to a declaratory judgment that: (a) the Google Play Developer Distribution Agreement (DDA) is a valid, lawful, and enforceable contract; (b) Epic breached that agreement; and (c) Google has the contractual right under the DDA to remove Fortnite from Google Play and terminate Epic as a registered Google Developer due to its breach. Google demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.ā