Apple Announces New MacBook Pro Laptops

Posted on October 27, 2016 by Paul Thurrott in Hardware, iOS with 76 Comments

Apple Announces New MacBook Pro Laptops

Apple today announced a new generation of MacBook Pro laptops in both 13- and 15-inch form factors. But the firm didn’t deliver a 13-inch MacBook as was also expected.

“This all-new generation of MacBook Pro is the biggest leap forward yet,” Apple senior VP Phil Schiller said in a bit prepared hyperbole. “With the groundbreaking new Touch Bar, the convenience of Touch ID, the best Mac display ever, powerful performance, improved audio, blazing fast storage and Thunderbolt 3 connectivity in our thinnest and lightest pro notebook yet.”

It was also a long time coming: Apple hasn’t updated its MacBook Pro line in years, and in a weird twist, these product include last year’s Intel Core “Skylake” chips, not the current generation “Kaby Lake” versions. So they’re out of date right from the start.

open

That said, Apple’s design prowess always shines through, and the new MacBook Pro is no exception. The body of each version is familiar, and immediately recognizable, but each and is also thinner and lighter than before. The 13-inch is 14.9 mm thick, a reduction of 17 percent. And the 15-inch is 15.5 mm thick, or 14 percent thinner. The 13-inch MacBook Pro weighs in at 3 pounds, while the 15-inch is 4 pounds.

top

Those are laptop weights, not Ultrabook weights, but then that’s the point: Where Apple’s 12-inch (non-Pro) MacBook and aging MacBook Air utilize lower-end mobile processors, the MacBook Pro models offer more power and more expandability.

That expandability has changed a lot this year, too: Instead of more traditional full-sized USB and miniDisplayPort ports, the new MacBook Pros feature two Thunderbolt 3/USB-C ports, and these ports can do multi-duty between charging, dual display, storage, and more.

But the marquee feature of the new MacBook Pro is of course the Touch Bar, a multi-touch enabled glass strip that appears above the keyboard and replaces the row of function keys. The Touch Bar is dynamic, and can change on a per-app basis, and while it may seem functionally similar to an idea that Lenovo briefly tried on the ThinkPad X1 Ultrabook, Apple’s version looks like it has legs.

strip

As good, Apple has finally added a TouchID sensor to the MacBook Pro too, so you can sign-in to the device using a modern, reliable, and proven technology.

I’m curious about the new keyboard, which looks exactly like the terrible keyboard Apple uses on its (non-Pro) MacBooks. But Apple says this one is a second-generation design with better key stability (whatever that means) and, presumably, a better key “throw”, given the thickness of the case. The Touch Trackpad is also bigger, though I find Apple’s trackpads to be pretty large as it is.

three

The new MacBook, though overdue, looks great, and it’s available in both standard aluminum silver and a darker space gray color . But it’s going to cost you: A base 13-inch model with a Core i5 processor, 8 GB of RAM, and 256 GB of SSD storage will set you back $1500. And the 15-inch version starts at $2400. These are of course Pro tools.

In many ways, I was looking forward more to a 13-inch MacBook, which would have replaced the ancient MacBook Air. That will eventually happen, of course, but for now Apple’s cheapest laptops are woefully out of date.

Apple is also expected to eventually update its equally out of date iMac lineup of All-In-One PCs. Given Microsoft’s Surface Studio announcement this week, that next iMac will be closely scrutinized to see how it matches up.

Tagged with ,

Join the discussion!

BECOME A THURROTT MEMBER:

Don't have a login but want to join the conversation? Become a Thurrott Premium or Basic User to participate

Register
Comments (81)

81 responses to “Apple Announces New MacBook Pro Laptops”

  1. 6750

    They've got rid of MagSafe!

    Idiots.

  2. 6242

    APPLE HAS OFFICIALLY BLOWN IT. Gimmicky upgrade - ergonomically nonsensical, and much less of a laptop than the Surface Book Pro...what has happened to Apple?

    • 5714

      In reply to VancouverNinja:

      I don't think this is a "BLOWN IT" moment.  Intel processors have changed very little in the last 18 months, and these new devices are very close to the products they are meant to replace.  I think the Touch Bar is useful, but I don't need to have it right away.  I can wait for Intel's future 10nm mobile processors that finally change the game.   Quad-core power will come to that 13" MacBook Pro and when it does I will make it my next laptop.  Until then, I'll just have to keep annoying peple with my glowing Apple logo.  Sorry about that.

  3. 341

    I'm thinking these models are expensive for what you get. Not that Apple always hasn't been that way but Paul is right the last gen chip and they are still this expensive? Looking at a Windows 10 laptop this time around...

  4. 5172

     I read elsewhere that they've removed the SD Card slot.  Which seems complete madness when so many photographers use it with their Macs.

  5. 3275

    I am a long time Mac guy that also spends a lot of time in the Windows world. I have a quite a bit oppressed gear and was looking to replace my MacNook Pro from 2010 (still doing well though) to go along with my Surface Pro 4, and iPad Pro 9.7. I was curious to see what they did today as I purchased an HP Spectre x360 (newest one) a few days ago. Been wanting USB-C nice light weight, decent power, and good battery life. I am so happy with my choice as quite honestly this refresh is a big yawn. I have come to want touch. Hoping the active pen from HP is caparible as they (hp) say it should be. I knew the new macs would not have touch but otherwise a pretty lackluster change compared to what they are replacing. A refresh of the ports is not ground breaking and is to be expected, but man, not much to even see here. Quite honestly, the touch strip doesn't get my pulse going like just looking at the new HP I got that has a ton more power at right around their entry level machine without the touch strip. And my wife wonders why I keep migrating to the Windows side?

  6. 177

    Did anyone notice how awkward it looked when people were using the Touch Bar? Everyone had to ball up there hands and use their index fingers in what looks to be an uncomfortable hand position.

    I'm not against a customizable screen for the function key area of the keyboard but I think they tried to cram too much functionality into that thin strip.

    • 5184

      In reply to Kevin Bae:

      I thought the same thing.  Seemed especially limiting and cumbersome during the DJ demo.  My impression was that it seems to be a fairly small target to hit and you pretty much have to look at it in order to hit your target since there is nothing physical to provide clues as to where you're tapping. 

      I do think this is a nice feature for Macs given the lack of touch screen.  It might even be better than a touch screen in some instances.  Will have to wait and physically try one out.

      My 2012-era non-retina MacBook Pro is working just fine, so I don't plan to pick a new one up until mine falls into the unsupported group.  I hope they have not ruined the keyboard going thinner.  I do truly love the keyboard on my MacBook Pro.  The keyboard on the 12" MacBook truly sucks.

  7. 5477

    I think the new Macbooks are boring compared to all the other laptops on the market. It has been several years since the last Macbook, and all Apple could come up with is a larger trackpad and a touchscreen display strip? They are have really faultered in innovation since Steve Jobs passed.  Apple is frankly not even trying anymore or especially taking risks. Risk is not removing a headphone port or making a bigger iPad or iPhone, it is releasing a totally new product, which Apple has not done. Although you can only do some much with innovating a laptop, if you look at other laptops on the market like the Surface Book, the new Macbook is lackluster in comparison. 

  8. 4215

    "The new MacBook Pros feature two Thunderbolt 3/USB-C ports": the 15" model has four ports, two on either side.

  9. 6014

    So... my wife was watching the video of their event with me, and her comments were:

    Why is the keyboard so tiny on that 15" laptop?

    Why did they make them thinner?  They were already tiny, shouldn't they make them more capable instead?

    So... instead of a touchscreen, the new strip is almost like having a touchscreen?

    I have to say I agree with her.  For such expensive hardware they seem to be missing the boat entirely.

    I also have no idea who is crazy enough to want to do real work on a 13" screen.  That's freaking tiny.  Maybe it's excusable on a consumer device, but not on something meant for creators.

  10. 1043

    The whole event felt like an hour of 3rd parties poorly advertising their latest gimmick and Apple overly concerned about trying to justify the Touch Bar to consumers. The only thing I watched the event for was to see new hardware across Apple's entire, outdated, lineup. Instead I sat through an hour+ long marketing demo for one slightly updated laptop. Complete waste of time and a stumble on Apple's part. For lack of a better word, Microsoft pwned them.

  11. 2592

    "In many ways, I was looking forward more to a 13-inch MacBook, which would have replaced the ancient MacBook Air."

    You kind of did get that. If you look at the new 13" MBP model - there's 2 (an entry-level model with no Touch Bar and a higher-end one with Touch Bar).  That 13" entry-level model at 3lbs is essentially your 13" MB but with a much faster U-series processor

    " in a weird twist, these product include last year’s Intel Core “Skylake” chips, not the current generation “Kaby Lake” versions."

    When it comes to the 13" / 15" MBP (both with Touch Bar options), the Kaby Lake processors designed for those specific units are not out yet. They will be out Q1 of 2017. The 13" MBP utilizes 28W Dual-core processors and the 15" utilizes 45W quad-core processors.  As far as I know, the only PC systems using Kaby Lake processors are ones that are utilizing the low-power 4.5W & 15W Kaby Lake processors, which are not designed for Pro machines

    Heck, even the new 14" Razer Blade and 17" Razer Blade Pro that just came are also using Skylake processors. 

    • 1169

      In reply to shameermulji:

      Agree with your points about the reason why Apple used Skylake due to unavilability of quad core Kaby Lake. I guess the question is why they didn't use the dual core i7-7500 in the 13s and taken advantage of the power reduction (15w v 28w) for the same (or slightly better) performance. Possibly it was due to the issues in explaining why one had the newest gen processor while the other was on an older generation?

  12. 7102

    Seems you must have a lot of dongels/adapers to everything. So the "Pro" name make no sense. I guess with Tim Cook as a CEO at Apple Microsoft have no much to fear.

  13. 5553

    In other words, Apple is admitting that touch is a useful interface on a traditional computer. But for some reason, it thinks users will want to interrupt their flow to look down and touch a narrow strip running along the top of the keyboard, instead of touching the beautiful massive display that they're already looking at as they type.

    What really seems to be going on here is pure stubbornness.

  14. 5516

    I disagree with your comments on the 12" MacBook's keyboard, I used one for 15 months and loved it. It does take some getting used to, but once I did I found that I typed faster and more accurately than my previous laptop. I think that most people who complain about it have never used one outside of an Apple store or BestBuy.

  15. 7102

    Maybe a good idea with the touch bar on the keyboard. You are already typing their and not need to touch the screen. A interesting concept. I like it, but time will tell if its a good Idea in the long run.

  16. 5629

    I built my Windows PC in 2012.  

    System Board: Intel Extreme DZ77GA-70K Panther Point
    CPU: Intel Core i7-3770K Ivy Bridge (4 cores, 3.5Ghz)
    Memory: Corsair Dominator GT 16GB (4GB X 4)
    SSD: Intel Cherryville 520 240GB
    HDD: Western Digital Caviar Black 2TB 7200RPM
    Blu-Ray Drive: Lite-On 12X BD-R
    DVD/CD Drive: Lite-On 24X DVD+R, 3D playback
    Power Supply: Corsair Professional Series Gold 750W
    O/S: Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1
    Video Display: Samsung 27" LCD Monitor P2770H
    Video Card: EVGA Geforce GTX 690

    The only thing I've upgraded was Windows 7 to Windows 10.

    I think sometime in 2017 or 2018 I can build a new Windows PC that seems significantly better than what I built in 2012.  I find this to be a sad situation.

    I think Apple sees the same thing.  There really is little reason to worry about upgrading PC hardware.  It would just be a big yawn.

    And - yes - I love MagSafe!  I wish Apple would put MagSafe on every external port.

  17. 699

    Reasonable review! (I like that you're not an Apple fan boy reviewing the Apple event, which makes it a real review.) What I thought was missing from the KeyNote today was an upgrade/update for the Mac Pro. That's the black trash can device that they haven't updated in over 1,000 days. I guess they've decided to kick that particular can to the curb? Also, no mention of updating the iMac or their accessories - Time Capsule, Airport and Airport Express are all years old and outdated at this point. Also, while the MacBook Air was mentioned (they said they would still continue to sell it, without updating it, which is weird to me) they didn't mention how the Airpods have been delayed another month or more.

    Also, didn't Microsoft "invent" the "touch bar" years ago? I saw a pic of it on another site on a black keyboard. Hrm. Another stolen Apple 'invention.' See: https://mspoweruser.com/as-usual-microsoft-did-the-touch-bar-first-but-actually-thought-better-of-it-video/

    Overall, an ok update, but the new i7 Surface Book STILL blows these out of the water. Compare the specs.

    Plus, Windows is just... amazing, and much more capable than OS X, Chrome or iOS.

    I also wanted to add, I think it's a shame that "Groove Music Maker" wasn't discussed at all yesterday during MS's event. Even if it weren't fully ready, they did show like 3 pics of it in their commercials, and that would be a great app to showcase for 'music creatives' who may want to purchase the pricey Surface Studio.

  18. 6525

    It is very nice to see that Apple uses Thunderbolt 3 and even embraces it in these notebooks. While I understand that currently they still use Skylake, they should (but will not) change to Kaby Lake after circa half a year, when the suitable CPUs appear. All iOS tablets and phones should replace Lightning by Thunderbolt 3, too.

  19. 22

    I still want to the the Microsoft Adaptive keyboard come to production.  It could revolutionize the keyboard input category. See Below.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojusRO38Tdc

  20. 953

    The base model is $400 more than the last year base model of the 15 inch. It would not be an issue if it hadoesn't a 512GB SSD drive but a 256GB I can't see why I would buy that much for it. I'm really need to change my Middle 2012 MacBook Pro 15 but do they know if I can justify the exact $200 more for a 512GB at $2599.

  21. 5553

    Apple had an event...new gimmicks ? ?

  22. 5215

    Two things:

    1. The trackpad will soon be larger the keyboards.  On this model they are roughly the same size.  Like damn!

    2. I think it's telling that major PC makers aren't going with the newest chips every time.  I think Intel may be struggling with regaining trust after some reliablility issues early in Skylake (a la SP4).

  23. 316

    Would be interesting to know why you think this touch strip would succeed after the Carbon X1 attempt failed. Genuine question - as it was rejected quite swftly by the thinkpad users.

    • 5118

      In reply to mattbg:

      Won't that be like asking why a fingerprint sensor would succeed on an iphone when it failed on the Motorola Atrix phone? 

      The iphone wasn't the first touchscreen smartphone. Why then did it succeed while all its predecessors fail?

      The answer boils down to these three words. "Better user experience". 

      I have never tried the thinkpad version, but if I were a betting man, I would daresay that the implementation likely sucked, and it lacked 3rd party support. 

      • 316

        In reply to Abazigal:

        Having read a bit more about it, it does seem like the MacBook version is more versatile and capable of things other than just button replacements. It almost looks like it can function as a control surface (which is supported by the claim that the bar is essentially an integrated Apple Watch).

        However - we don't know if this the Apple attempt will succeed yet. It might help if they rolled it out universally (rather than just on MacBook Pros). I don't know to what extent F-keys are important to the Mac experience, but it's hard to imagine that any bar in this area could do anything useful enough to encourage me to give up my F-keys on a Windows PC.

  24. 4964

    Are all the product shots done with a black background image to minimise the still present screen bezel?
  25. 252

    The images (colorful powder) on the displays reminds me of that used on the Surface Studio :)

  26. 5542

    They have 4 Thunderbolt/USB-C ports, two on each side, not 2 total.

  27. 821

    I really don't understand why they couldn't have left a physical ESC key and just made the touch bar a teeny tiny bit shorter. Also, still no touchscreen. I understand the last year's CPU decision - they're going with cheaper hardware to maximize profits. But they could have easily left an ESC key and added a touchscreen, charged yet another $100, and continued to rake in the profits. I don't get some of their decisions - those two make no sense to me. Hell, make the touchscreen a $300 upgrade option and enough people will cough up the money for it. :-/

    • 1139

      In reply to Jaxidian:

      Apple is still adamant touchscreens don't belong on computers, only phones and tablets. Why they take that position, I don't know.

      • 1306

        In reply to Vuppe:

        Apple's position is pretty easy to understand if you look at the market shares of MacOS and iOS.  They don't want to potentially cannibalize iOS sales by acknowledging that there is value to having a touchscreen with a full laptop/desktop OS since an awful lot of those sales would go to Windows-based devices.  They need to keep hammering home the message that if you want touch/tablet capabilities, you are better off with a mobile OS.

      • 5767

        In reply to Vuppe:

        Because honestly until the Surface Studio with ability to bring the screen down to a 20 degree angle, touching your screen made no sense. But for a $3000-$4200 price tag I'm still not sure it makes sense. Apple's OLED Touch Bar is pretty f-en genius stuff.

        • 5027

          In reply to MutualCore:  A maxed out MacBook Pro 15" cost almost $4300 a Maxed out Surface Studio cost $4500, yet for some reason the Surface Studio is considered expensive?  Just getting an equivalent wacom system would set you back $2500 easy, and then you still would need to buy a computer 
          Sacrificing real keys for a touch bar is the dumbest thing I have seen in a long time. 
          If you are a professional you want to keep your focus on the screen, not down on your keyboard.  You know where they keys are and you can feel they are there.  With a touchbar you loose that..  for what?  A pointles gimmick.  Touch is great on a full screen, but not on a tiny strip above the keyboard. Because you will need to switch focus from the real screen to the tiny screen to check what damn icons are showing up this time, and where.  It is beyond dumb if you ask me. 
          They are removing useful keys, and messing up the whole keyboard in the process, for zero benefit. What is the point of that?  With a touch screen on a laptop you can use it , or not use it..that is up to you..with this MacBook Pro they give you no choice.. really .. you will have to use it if you ever want to use an Esc button ever again (if you dont add an external keyboard but then, why buy a laptop?)
          Only good thing is that they finally are adding a fingerprint reader...but of course Apple beeing Apple just had to place it at the worst possible place they could. As far away as posible from where your fingers naturally will be if you are browsing online and want to buy something with Apple pay, or login to something with it, or similar.
          If you are using the touch pad to navigate , your fingers will of course be below the keyboard,  so  why not have the finger print reader there?  nope .. just have to put it as far away as possible.  Sure I get that is lets you login as you power it up, but that is about it .  Why not have a normal keyboard , with function keys, Esc,  and a proper powerbutton,  and add a fingerprint reader at the botton that also can wake up the computer. It is not rocket science. 

           

          • 821

            In reply to JudaZuk:

            So I'm torn on whether the Touch Bar is a good idea or not.

            1. It's painfully obvious and I think we can all agree that an improvement would be to make the Touch Bar a tad shorter and still have an ESC key. I'm absolutely not torn about this - that would be a universal improvement.
            2. I think the Touch Bar would be good if it *only* replaced media keys. Now this is a moot point since the Macbook Pro didn't have any dedicated media keys.
            3. I think the Touch Bar would be good if it was an addition to the old Macbook Pro keyboard. I think we can all agree with this, and that there was plenty of room to add one as well - the top of the clamshell has plenty of space for this. It would take some engineering effort to make it work but Apple has some smart people working there and they could figure it out.
            4. I'm not sure the Touch Bar is a good thing to replace physical Function keys (F1-F12). I personally don't like it but for the masses, I could entertain arguments that they're not an effective use of keyboard space. Still, I don't like it but I could see that argument.

             

            Overall, I don't like this implementation. Add to the fact that we now have Macbook-style keys and it's painfully obvious that I would MUCH prefer the keyboards of the previous generation over this generation even if I must lose the Touch Bar. No doubt about that!

        • 699

          In reply to MutualCore:

          Not really all that genius. Microsoft actually invented it years before:

          https://mspoweruser.com/as-usual-microsoft-did-the-touch-bar-first-but-actually-thought-better-of-it-video/

    • 442

      In reply to Jaxidian:

      Seems to me Apple has lost it's direction with the end user.  Removing well used and wanted ports, changing keyboards, failing to update to better hardware.  Not good for users in general.

  28. 5485

    I don't care much about being or not a last year CPU. I don't buy CPU's. I'm more interested in knowing if this CPU is already reliable from all perspectives and more. If that is the case why using yet a untested and unproved CPU model be better? When it comes to shell out a lot of $$ I don't want the latest and the greatest. I want the latest and greatest ... and the most reliable. The rest is pure entertainment for the geeks wanna be trendy and cool. Reliabilitt is extremly important for productiviy and quality of our tech lifes.

    • 2233

      In reply to nbplopes: Agreed... Microsoft learned the hard way with Skylake and now that the problems are fixed, Apple is safe using it. I'm glad Microsoft held off on Kaby Lake. They are being smart and I have high hopes that Surface Book 2 & Pro 5 will be their first near perfect launch.  They are learning.
      As for a 13" Macbook, they did announce a second 13" Pro that I think was 1499. No touch bar, but if I remember correctly, it weighs less than the 13" Macbook Air.  I could be wrong there, as I didn't go back and research that.

       

    • 1139

      In reply to nbplopes:

      If you're looking for reliable, Skylake is not where you want to go. They've been plagued with reliability issues since Day 1.

      • 7290

        In reply to Vuppe:

         This is simply not true.  My company has been deploying Dell Latitudes with Skylake i5/i7's for the last year with Windows 7 and 10 and we have no problem.

        Microsoft had problems with the new C-steps in the Skylake CPU's on Surface devices and they are fixed (I think) after many, many firmware updates.

        Paul throws it out there on this site and Windows weekly that Skylake has problems but he never goes past that.  How about why and example of non-surface devices that have problem with Skylake.  He wont becaues I don't think he is technicale enought to do so.

      • 2233

        In reply to Vuppe:

        I have tons of Skylake machines running mission critical applications with no problem whatsoever... I got in on Skylake after most of these issues were ironed out.  Kaby Lake is going to have to be in the wild a while before I trust it, just like Skylake.

        I strongly feel you are incorrect about Skylake not being reliable.  I don't know what you do or how many machines you maintain, but you can't just look at issues from a blog and deem something unreliable.  Microsoft jumped that bandwagon too early and they paid for it.

  29. 5713

    I am so curious about the size of that trackpad - is there any benefit to that monstrous thing?

    • 7290

      In reply to Adam_Desrosiers:

      IMHO the current Macbook trackpad is simply amazing and better than anything I have tried on the PC side.  One of the big reasons that is so is size.  Some PC laptops have bigger track pads but lots do not.  Using the Macbook trackpad is great.  I can only imagine this one is even better.  Plus they do a lot with guestures.  

  30. 1139

    Incrimental. As are all Apple events recently. Baby steps.

     

  31. 7281

    You say these machines are already out of date for using Skylake generation processors . . . But isn't that exactly the same generation that's used in the new Surface Studio and Surface Book? Doesn't that make them all out of date regarding this component? What am I missing when it comes to the CPUs? 

  32. 5529

    The keyboard doesn't make sense. The message seems to be the screen does't have enough realestate, so lets add some more. And lets add touch, because we pioneered touch for the masses, and we know it is useful. But instead of adding it to the actual screen, lets add it to the keyboard, since no one wants an actuai touch screen, and we don't want to seem like we are copying Microsoft.

    Also, our laptops seem to be lasting to long, so we can use more power with the second screen.

  33. 5529

    BTW, did Apple stop making and selling thier own displays? Isn't this the first time they pushed someone else's display without having one of their own on stage?

  34. 7731

     Wow, many people complaining!  It could be worse you know, like they could have joined all the PC makers and changed the aspect ration of the screen to a useless 16 x 9, but at least they didn't.  To me, this was a good release minus the touch bar, which I think is gimmicky.  Everything else is great: thinner and lighter than previous gens, even better screen, and still retains 16 x 10 ratio.  All pluses in my book, and I am not even a mac guy.  Heck when I had my 2015 13" mbp I mostly ran Windows in bootcamp, and it still ran great, even the battery life was great. 

  35. 117

    I think the one point missed here is the price.. Surfacebook starts $2399 while Macbook Pro 13 starts at $1499. I'm starting to see that these 'Pro' devices are getting more expensive, ironically, with Microsoft. There was a time when Apple was the one with the high price-tag when it came to laptops.. not anymore.  Oh, and the Skylake chip and being out of date right from the start, isn't the new Surfacebook also using Skylake?

    • 4370

      In reply to abdulla77:

      you didn't understand the new Surface Book. It's not a Surface Book 2, it's just a new variant of the top of the line. You cannot compare it with the base line. It's an i7, not an i5. Surface book starts at $1499 exactly like the MBP 13

Leave a Reply