Microsoft Open-Sources Early MS-DOS Versions, This Time to GitHub

Microsoft this week announced that it has “re-open-sourced” MS-DOS 1.25 and 2, this time to GitHub. The releases follow any earlier open-sourcening, ahem, via the Computer History Museum in 2014.

“We’re re-open-sourcing MS-DOS on GitHub because it’s much easier to find, read, and refer to MS-DOS source files if they’re in a GitHub repo than in the original downloadable compressed archive file,” Microsoft’s Rich Turner explains. “The source files are being (re)published for historical reference purposes and to allow exploration and experimentation for those interested in early PC operating systems [only].”

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

That last bit refers to the fact that GitHub is often used for open-source projects where others can make “pull requests,” which are suggestions for modifications. Obviously, Microsoft has no intention of modifying this code.

The MS-DOS source code was written entirely in 8086 Assembly Language and dates back to 1980. So you’ll want to fire up your dusty copy of MASM while strolling done memory lane.

 

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 9 comments

  • dstrauss

    02 October, 2018 - 8:45 am

    <p>Any chance they'll bring back the PC Jr. and eight track tapes at today's "Moment" event? Sorry, just couldn't resist – my bad.</p>

    • navarac

      02 October, 2018 - 9:17 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#337325">In reply to dstrauss:</a></em></blockquote><p>As long as MS-DOS 4 doesn't make an appearance. It was awful.</p>

  • wright_is

    Premium Member
    02 October, 2018 - 8:51 am

    <p>That would be 8088 / 8086 assembler. ;-)</p><p>It makes interesting reading, although I grew up on Z80, 6502, DEC Macro and Motorola 68000 assembler, the 6502 and especially 68000 were designed for programmers, the x86 assembler is much more programmer hostile.</p>

    • christian.hvid

      03 October, 2018 - 5:24 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#337326">In reply to wright_is:</a></em></blockquote><p>The powerful MACRO-11 assembler, along with the perfect symmetry of the PDP-11 processor itself, was absolute Nirvana for assembler programmers. We shall never see its like again. </p>

  • MikeGalos

    02 October, 2018 - 10:57 am

    <p>I read a lot of the code when it was first released and it was fascinating to read the comments. </p>

  • skane2600

    02 October, 2018 - 10:58 am

    <p>I can't comment directly on the Premium side but I concur with "wright_is", that 8088/86 was a terrible CPU for programmers. The lack of a linear address space arguably created a 10% or more hit on software development efficiency. One wonders if the Mac would have been created at all if Apple had used the 8086 rather than a 68000.</p>

  • jimchamplin

    Premium Member
    02 October, 2018 - 12:08 pm

    <p>Will it build? ?</p>

  • cwfinn

    Premium Member
    02 October, 2018 - 1:19 pm

    <p>I'm still running MS-DOS 2.2 on my HP95LX with Lotus 123 built into ROM! Now I can see the source code! ;)</p>

  • jil789r

    13 November, 2018 - 7:00 am

    <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">For those of you who share my passion for all DOS games you might wanna check out </span><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">classicreload.com </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">, tons of&nbsp;DOS based games , ZX, commodore 64.</span></p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC