Qualcomm Appeals FTC Antitrust Ruling

Posted on May 29, 2019 by Paul Thurrott in Hardware, Mobile with 8 Comments

Qualcomm has asked a federal judge not to enforce her antitrust ruling against the firm so that it can appeal the case.

“After radically restructuring its business relationships [as would be required by the ruling], Qualcomm will not be able to return to its pre-injunction business in an orderly fashion,” a Qualcomm statement notes. “Nor will it be able to unwind licensing agreements it has renegotiated in the shadow of an order that is later overturned.”

Citing “serious legal questions,” Qualcomm believes it can win an appeal of the dramatic antitrust ruling against it. The case basically hinges on how Qualcomm licenses its intellectual property, including in many cases multiple chipsets, to mobile device makers. The court ruled that Qualcomm’s prices were too high, and that the firm was abusing its monopoly power. But Qualcomm, perhaps unexpectedly, has a different take.

“Qualcomm is the developer and enabler of foundational technologies for the wireless industry,” as a website devoted to its defense explains. “Our inclusive, flexible licensing and mobile technology transfer program ensures rapid technology advancement and competition across the ecosystem. Through standards development and our broad licensing program, we make our breakthroughs available to licensees who use them to develop products.”

According to Qualcomm, it has invested over $57 billion, or about 20 percent of its annual revenues each year, in the technologies it licenses to others. The firm doesn’t keep its inventions, which are covered by over 130,000 patents and patent applications. Instead, it licenses them so that partners can build unique solutions of their own.

“Today, Qualcomm has hundreds of agreements, and more than 11 billion licensed mobile devices have shipped worldwide,” it continues. “Thanks to the Qualcomm team and collaboration within the entire mobile industry, the next generation of wireless, 5G, debuted a year ahead of schedule. Mobile has not only become the world’s largest technology platform, it has achieved that scale faster than any technology in human history. Our technology transfer program works.”

As for the case itself, Qualcomm says it “strongly disagrees” with “irreparably flawed” FTC case, which it says is “lacking any plausible theory of competitive harm.”

“Mobile handset makers repeatedly testified that Qualcomm had the best chips available, while even Intel testified that Qualcomm R&D drives the pace of cellular innovation,” it says. “This is the very essence of competition – innovation and superior products. Contrary to the FTC’s claims, Qualcomm’s licensing model promotes, rather than harms, competition in the mobile chip industry, and more broadly the global mobile industry is thriving and competitive. The agency demonstrated no harm to competition, while other testimony portrayed a chip market that is thriving, dynamic, and innovative with intense competition, declining prices, improved chip performance, and declining Qualcomm market share. Qualcomm looks forward to the opportunity to be heard on appeal.”

Tagged with

Join the discussion!

BECOME A THURROTT MEMBER:

Don't have a login but want to join the conversation? Become a Thurrott Premium or Basic User to participate

Register
Comments (8)

8 responses to “Qualcomm Appeals FTC Antitrust Ruling”

  1. Avatar

    toukale

    The issue is not about who has the best modern, it had everything to do with the way they tie their ip licensing with their chips. Essentially using their dominance in one area to prop up another area. Essentially Qualcomm Snapdragon chip is dominating because of their ip, that's all. They essentially doing what Microsoft of the 90's were doing, but in their case its even worse. Microsoft did not have a government provided monopoly in the form of patents, because that's what being rewarded with a standard patent is, a government granted monopoly.


    Qualcomm would not be in this if they did not have a chip business, same as Apple is now with spotify when they launched the Apple music streaming. The remedy is for Qualcomm to separate their chip from their ip licensing, then we will see how good their snapdragon chips stand to fare on their own. As usual, greed got them in trouble. That is usually the case with every big corporations, it's not good enough to have a good business that makes money, the need to continue to grow is not sustainable for any company.

  2. Avatar

    DBSync

    Qualcomm to Judge - We know you spent 4 months coming to a decision, but you are so wrong....BTW can you not spank us.

  3. Avatar

    proesterchen

    "Qualcomm will not be able to return to its pre-injunction business"


    You mean your illegal previous business model? No s#!t, Sherlock, that's kind of the point.

  4. Avatar

    jchampeau

    It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. On the one hand, any company with revenues and reach like Qualcomm's should be carefully looked at. But on the other hand, there are some really cheap but decent phones out there with Qualcomm chips in them.

  5. Avatar

    BrianEricFord

    The evidence usually DOES sound pretty strong when it’s coming from the lawyers of the side that has no interest or advantage in admitting the flaws of their arguments or the validity of the claims against them.


  6. Avatar

    wright_is

    Erm, isn't the whole point of such a judgement that the company has acted illegally and it should change its ways? So not being able to do business as it used to after the ruling is exactly what the ruling is meant to do!

Leave a Reply