Antitrust Ruling Against Qualcomm is Thrown Out on Appeal

A 2019 antitrust ruling against mobile chipmaking giant Qualcomm has been thrown out by a U.S. appeals court. The ruling is a major setback for the Federal Trade Commission, which had accused the hardware maker of abusing its market power with excessive licensing costs.

“Qualcomm is under no antitrust duty to license rival chip suppliers,” the appeals court ruling notes.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

In May 2019, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh ruled that Qualcomm’s licensing fees were “unreasonably high” and she ordered the firm to renegotiate its agreements with phone makers and without threatening to cut off access to Qualcomm’s technology. As part of the ruling, the FTC was to have monitored Qualcomm’s business practices for 7 years.

Qualcomm appealed the ruling a week later, citing “serious legal questions” and that it had invested over $57 billion, or about 20 percent of its annual revenues each year, in the technologies it licenses to others.

“Qualcomm is the developer and enabler of foundational technologies for the wireless industry,” the firm noted at the time. “Our inclusive, flexible licensing and mobile technology transfer program ensures rapid technology advancement and competition across the ecosystem. Through standards development and our broad licensing program, we make our breakthroughs available to licensees who use them to develop products.”

In an interesting development, the U.S. Department of Justice backed Qualcomm’s appeal, arguing that the original ruling could undermine U.S. leadership 5G wireless networks and other emerging technologies.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 4 comments

  • Vladimir Carli

    Premium Member
    11 August, 2020 - 2:00 pm

    <p>This doesn’t look very good. Isn’t it in a way similar to what Apple does with the Apple store?</p>

  • toukale

    11 August, 2020 - 2:19 pm

    <p>This case is tainted by the politics of the current environment. The last thing the current administration wants to do is weaken Qualcomm. Was surprised when the FTC won, the FTC even argued against its own case about the level of punishment. That should tell you everything you need to know about this case.</p>

  • johnh3

    11 August, 2020 - 3:36 pm

    <p>Some interesting Qualcomm news, they and Google will invest in HMD Global (Nokia)</p><p>Maybe they expect a trade war USA vs China?</p><p><br></p><p>I wonder if more brands than Huawei will be blacklisted, like OnePlus. So Nokia might be a plan B, if they cant sell processors to Chinese phone brands?</p><p><br></p>

  • Usman

    Premium Member
    12 August, 2020 - 2:29 am

    <blockquote><em><a href="#560620">In reply to Hawaiianteg:</a></em></blockquote><p>'<span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">&nbsp;</span><em style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">the U.S. Department of Justice backed Qualcomm’s appeal, arguing that the original ruling could undermine U.S. leadership 5G wireless networks and other emerging technologies</em><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">.'</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Seems to be current administration meddling and doing favours for US tech companies due to China and 5G fears</span></p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC