Android 8.0 Oreo Feature Focus: Picture-in-Picture

Android 8.0 Oreo Feature Focus: Picture-in-Picture

Android 8.0 Oreo supports picture-in-picture (PIP), so you can do two things at once. Assuming, that is, that you can find an app that supports this functionality.

This chicken-and-the-egg problem will be familiar to those who wish to take advantage of the similar Compact Overlay feature that debuted in Windows 10 version 1703. So far, only a few in-box apps, like Movies & TV and Skype, support it.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

These things take time, of course. And the first step is just adding the capability to the platform. Which Google has now done with Android.

I don’t have a complete list of which apps support PIP on Android, but Google Chrome, Google Duo, Google Maps, Google Play Movies & TV, and YouTube are among them. (That latter app, unfortunately, requires a paid YouTube Red subscription to work in PIP.) The commonality here is that most of these apps can play video, exactly the type of content one might want to use PIP. (The exception is Google Maps.)

You can see which apps support PIP by navigating to Settings > Apps & notifications > Advanced > Special app access > Picture-in-picture. This interface lets you disable PIP on an app-by-app basis since it can be annoying if you’re not expecting it or don’t wish to use it.

Frustratingly, how you use PIP varies from app-to-app. Google Chrome, for example, will only utilize PIP for video, and it will only do so when that video is playing full-screen. And, in a further wrinkle, you—obviously, in retrospect—cannot play YouTube-based videos via Chrome in PIP unless you’re paying for YouTube Red.

But once you’ve met all the requirements, it works as expected: Play the video in full-screen, press your Home button, and you return to the home screen as expected, but with that video still playing in a floating PIP window.

You can do a number of things with this window: Drag it to a new position on-screen, close it, access basic playback controls, and return the video to normal full-screen mode. You can also run another app, of course: That app will run under the PIP window so you can do two things at once. (Also, if you select the PIP window, it will increase in size briefly, presumably to make it easier to drag around.)

You can also drag the PIP window down to the bottom edge of the screen to dismiss it. This doesn’t “close” the video per se, meaning that you can still access it from the notification shade if you’d like.

I assume Google Play Movies & TV and YouTube work similarly, but I wasn’t able to get the former to work and I don’t pay for YouTube Red.

With Google Maps, PIP will work once you start navigating to a location. So when you start navigating and press Home, that PIP window will appear over the home screen and over any apps you subsequently run. And, yes, voice navigation feature works in PIP too.

Unlike with video playback windows, however, Google Maps doesn’t provide any special controls. You can move the PIP window around, select it to return Google Maps to a full-screen view, or swipe it off the bottom of the screen to dismiss it. If you do dismiss it, Google Maps will continue to navigate, and you can access your directions from the notification shade or by returning to the app.

Basically, PIP works as expected with the exception of Google Play Movies & TV. Hopefully, that will be updated soon. And we’ll see some healthy third-party app support for this feature in the near future too.


Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 20 comments

  • jimchamplin

    Premium Member
    23 September, 2017 - 11:40 am

    <p>Looks nice! I always thought PiP would work just fine on a phone. Google Maps is a perfect use!</p>

  • rameshthanikodi

    23 September, 2017 - 1:10 pm

    <p>"cannot play YouTube-based videos via Chrome in PIP unless you’re paying for YouTube Red"</p><p>what a total DICK move. </p>

    • rob4jen

      24 September, 2017 - 6:25 pm

      <blockquote><em>YouTube Red (or Google Play Music) is required for YouTube background play. This is just an extension of that.</em></blockquote><blockquote><a href="#181082"><em>In reply to FalseAgent:</em></a></blockquote><p><br></p>

      • rameshthanikodi

        25 September, 2017 - 1:53 am

        <blockquote><a href="#181179"><em>In reply to rob4jen:</em></a></blockquote><p>No it isn't. That's just for the app. I'm talking about the browser and the youtube mobile site. Unless i'm mistaken, it looks like they have made use of their market position of the Chrome web browser and retroactively exclude youtube's site from using PIP video while web video anywhere else in the browser has PIP. Youtube in Safari (both iOS and OSX) have PIP, no reason why Google isn't allowing it in Android/Chrome except to be dicks. No one wants Youtube Red.</p>

    • Jorge Garcia

      25 September, 2017 - 1:50 am

      <blockquote><a href="#181082"><em>In reply to FalseAgent:</em></a></blockquote><p>It's a D move for sure, but if you think about it, who the heck would ever pay for music ever again if you could just go youtube, search for the songs you want, make a playlist and the toss the youtube app into the background while it's playing.</p>

      • rameshthanikodi

        25 September, 2017 - 6:13 am

        <blockquote><a href="#181203"><em>In reply to JG1170:</em></a></blockquote><p>Youtube is not a real music service. There are ads, and music videos are often a slightly different mix from the original. And if you're an audiophile, it's sort of an open secret that most youtube uploads have crappy sound quality while still consuming more data than a high-quality audio stream. It blows my mind how people still rely on youtube for all their music needs. They would be better off with Spotify, even the free version. You can't really curate a music library on youtube. I know lots of people do it, but it's haphazard.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Also, I believe this Youtube Red feature was originally background audio pre-Android 8, and I understand Google wanting people to pay for that, because you're ignoring the ads and everyone understands that background audio is really suited for music, but with Android 8, they're extending it to PIP. I think that is complete rubbish, because it's not the same thing, we're not talking about background audio. With PIP you're actually still watching the video, complete with monetized ads. It shouldn't be a Youtube Red feature. Screw them.</p>

        • Bill Russell

          25 September, 2017 - 3:37 pm

          <blockquote><a href="#181212"><em>In reply to FalseAgent:</em></a></blockquote><p>I would say screw the rights holders who are setting the rules, if anyone. Youtube is trying to pay the artists more while trying to turn a profit itself.</p>

    • Chris_Kez

      Premium Member
      25 September, 2017 - 11:20 am

      <blockquote><a href="#181082"><em>In reply to FalseAgent:</em></a></blockquote><p>Will You-Tube based videos work okay in Split-screen mode or does that require YT Red as well?</p>

    • Bill Russell

      25 September, 2017 - 3:35 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#181082"><em>In reply to FalseAgent:</em></a></blockquote><p>Subscribing is worth it – for the same price as spotify, you get youtube red and all its advantages along with Play Music, although the app blows but its about the music. The youtube and youtube music apps are good however.</p>

  • Michael Rivers

    23 September, 2017 - 1:29 pm

    <p>It's really useful with Maps. I change podcasts and music a lot, and having the map in the corner is nice. I hope Waze adds this soon.</p>

  • mmurfin87

    Premium Member
    23 September, 2017 - 4:44 pm

    <p>Seems disappointing next to Samsung MultiWindow</p>

    • Jeff Jones

      24 September, 2017 - 3:35 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#181108"><em>In reply to mmurfin87:</em></a></blockquote><p><br></p><p>That's because the Android Multitasking feature covers that. PiP is not intended to be like Samsung's Multi Window.</p>

  • skane2600

    24 September, 2017 - 3:56 pm

    <p>With the spaciousness of a typical smartphone display, it seems like a great idea. /s</p>

    • Chris_Kez

      Premium Member
      25 September, 2017 - 11:19 am

      <blockquote><a href="#181175"><em>In reply to skane2600:</em></a></blockquote><p>Come on now, no need for sarcasm. This is a nice addition, and depending on the particular apps it could be a nice option for when you want to give a little more room to the primary app than what you would get in split-screen view (see image below for comparison showing Chrome video over Fenix in PiP (left) and Split-screen (right)). For keeping an eye on a video or map track, it's not really any less glance-able than most Android widgets or a medium-size Live Tile on a Windows Phone. </p><p>Is it's usefulness somewhat circumscribed at the moment? Sure, but it may be a first step towards more robust windowing options in Android. It may also be more useful eventually in Chrome OS (or Android tablets? someday?) where you have Android apps running on larger screens.</p><p><img src=""><img src=""></p>

  • dcdevito

    24 September, 2017 - 7:53 pm

    <p>This is a clear example of Android gaining more strength where it is at its strongest: power user features, and distancing itself from iOS. </p>

  • Mike Dowsett

    24 September, 2017 - 8:58 pm

    <p>Ironic that the much maligned Samsung Touchwiz has had this function for many years, and what's more it works with any app, resize it, move it around etc</p>

    • PeteB

      25 September, 2017 - 1:02 am

      <blockquote><a href="#181195"><em>In reply to mdarch07:</em></a></blockquote><p>K. Not sure why that's ironic.</p><p>Something else has a similar feature, BFD. It's not the same as this.</p>

  • Jorge Garcia

    25 September, 2017 - 1:44 am

    <p>Since Microsoft insists on staying in the consumer battle…they need to bring back Windows Mobile, seriously. But not for phones. They should tweak it to make work on tablets and even desktops. Sure, it would lack apps but maybe over time they could get the developers to come back. I am not describing Windows RT, I'm describing Windows Mobile, where there is no such thing as a desktop (only a home screen), no such thing as double-click, and things like drag-and-drop are there, but very limited.</p>

    • Bill Russell

      25 September, 2017 - 3:29 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#181202"><em>In reply to JG1170:</em></a></blockquote><p>They just did bring back windows mobile. Its the successor to Windows phone 10. Its just that no one seems to be using it. </p>

      • Jorge Garcia

        25 September, 2017 - 6:54 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#181483"><em>In reply to Bill_Russell:</em></a></blockquote><p>Where? I mean Windows Mobile tweaked and disguised as a very basic tablet and desktop OS, not so much for phones.</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC