Windows Phone: The Final Insult (Premium)

I keep thinking that I'm done writing about Windows phone. And then something horrible happens. Again.

No, I'm not talking about the now-infamous New York Post article that described the New York Police Department's need to scrap 36,000 "useless" Windows phone that they had purchased two years before as part of a $160 million NYPD Mobility Initiative.

See, I had actually decided to simply ignore that story. I didn't feel that I'd have any positive commentary to add to what is, and should be, a huge embarrassment to both Microsoft and the NYPD. And that writing about it would simply be like poking an open wound.

And then this happened.

Jessica Tisch, the NYPD deputy commissioner of information technology, and the person who was singularly responsible for deciding on Windows phone two years ago---right when Microsoft announced it was abandoning the platform, by the way---actually wrote a retort to the NYPost.

And, my God. Did she blow it.

Now, I understand why she felt the need to respond, though I'll point out that she references the NYPost article without linking to the publication or its original report. According to the NYPost and its sources, Tisch is "a terror when she doesn't get her way" and she pushed through the deal despite all the evidence that Windows phone was a non-starter.

But what Tisch neglected to do in her retort to this damning indictment, from what I can see, is what she did when she chose Windows phone in the first place: She didn't seek any adult supervision, or any other opinions. Frankly, the evidence here suggests that she has terrible decision-making abilities.

Here's why.

In her retort, Tisch offers up stats that would be true of any smartphone that the NYPD might have chosen: The NYPD used their phones to "respond to 911 calls, run searches, and view flyers of missing or wanted persons." So nothing specific to Windows phone.

But the damning bit is that Tisch actually details what I think is the real reason that she, and thus the NYPD, chose Windows phone.

It was free.

"The contract entered provided for the smartphones at no cost," she wrote. "It also allowed for the NYPD to replace the smartphones with devices of our choosing two years later, also at no cost."

Please read that again. Not only were the initial 36,000 phones free to the NYPD, but so were the replacement phones that would arrive two years later. They were to receive 72,000 free Windows phones. That is why they chose Windows phone.

She offers up other baloney to explain why moving to iPhone somehow makes sense only now---"improvements in Apple controls would allow NYPD to responsibly and cost effectively move our mobility initiative to the Apple platform"---but that's just track covering. The NYPD saved tons of money by choosing Windows phone; iPhone, by comparison, is expensive. That was the full depth of this decision. It was only about money.

"Our smartphone initiative is 45% under budget," she brags. ...

Gain unlimited access to Premium articles.

With technology shaping our everyday lives, how could we not dig deeper?

Thurrott Premium delivers an honest and thorough perspective about the technologies we use and rely on everyday. Discover deeper content as a Premium member.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC