Hands-On: Spotify + Sonos

Hands-On: Spotify + Sonos

For the past few months, I’ve been testing a new capability that integrates Spotify Premium with the Sonos connected speaker system.

It’s wonderful. And it needs to come to other music services immediately.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sonos announced in late August that it would open up its connected speaker systems to third party apps. If you use Sonos, you understand why this is a big deal.

If you do not, then here’s the short version: To date, Sonos has been a closed system, meaning that you must use the firm’s Sonos Connector app (on Windows or mobile) to play music through their speakers. This is both good and bad: Though I find Sonos Connector to be terribly designed and hard to use, it does let you mix and match playlists from multiple services. But who really needs that feature? (And who would want to lock the resulting playlists to Sonos?)

The other issue with Sonos Controller is that you’re stuck with whatever services it supports. There is broad support for music services—even Microsoft Groove is in there—but it starts to break down when you turn to podcasts. And Audible isn’t supported at all. (It used to be.)

So Sonos opening up its speakers to third party apps is huge. This means that the apps we actually use could support playback over Sonos, just as they support Chromecast (Android, iOS) and AirPlay (iOS) today. It makes Sonos a smarter and safer buy, which helps everyone—Sonos and its potential customers—because these things are so damned expensive.

Finally, it’s nice to just use a single app. If you choose Spotify, or Groove, or whatever, you get used to how that app works. And it’s weird to have to switch apps to play music over a certain speaker or set of speakers. This should just work from the app. And now, with Spotify, it does.

As I wrote in August, Sonos is opening up its speakers first with Spotify, the world’s leading paid streaming music service, and with Echo, Amazon’s market-leading voice-controlled digital assistant appliance. I don’t have an Echo, but as noted, I have been testing this capability with Spotify, thanks to a Sonos beta program I’m part of.

But you don’t need to be in the beta: As of this month, anyone can control Sonos speakers using the Spotify app. You need to have a Spotify Premium (or Premium for Family) account to use this feature, but beyond that it works exactly as expected.

On my iPhone, I see all of the available speakers in the house: There are Sonos, AirPlay, and Chromecast options on the Now Playing screen.


When I tap that area, I see the list. My living room-based Sonos system—a paired set of Sonos PLAY:1 speakers, the cheapest models they sell—appears as “Living Room,” which is the name I gave them in Sonos Connector, and is noted as type “Spotify Connect”.


To switch from the phone’s internal speakers to my Sonos system, I just select that option from the list, obviously. Basic playback works exactly as you’d expect, and you can adjust the volume, navigate through your collection, whatever, just as you normally do. The only difference is that playback occurs through the Sonos speakers. It’s only worth mentioning because this was never possible before (from the Spotify app).


But there are other capabilities. You can also select a “More” (“…”) option next to the Sonos speaker system to manage Sonos speaker groups (rooms, really; I have only the one) or to do more complex management tasks, which requires (and launches) the Sonos Connector app.

Spotify also benefits from the social functionality that Sonos has always offered. Which is to say that Sonos speaker systems are, by default, “unlocked”: Anyone can come into your home and add songs to the Now Playing list and make other changes. Now they can do so with Spotify too. (This can be abused, of course.)

I was surprised to discover Sonos was opening up its speakers, but in retrospect it makes tons of sense. And now that it’s available on Spotify—which I have because the rest of my family uses this service—I’d like to see it opened up on the music apps I really do use. And on Audible, which would be amazing.

Good stuff.


Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 9 comments

  • 6354

    19 December, 2016 - 7:59 am

    <p>I’d rather see the new MA-USB support MS is adding to Redstone 2 potentially enabling inexpensive wireless (and network wired) USB speakers, for whole house audio all controlled from Windows, with any Windows audio source and Windows app possible.</p>
    <p>I’m not a fan of proprietary tech, such as Sonos or especially something such as Apple being "brave" by removing the headphone jack while retaining the iPhone lightning port, so that their phones can’t even plug directly into their laptops or any of the upcoming USB-C headphones (that I expect will become the de facto standard).</p>
    <p>Redstone 2 reportedly already has an MA-USB driver, and the technology is explained here,</p>
    <p>IF it works well, I think the ability to place USB devices anywhere within wireless network range is going to be a boon for Windows and device manufacturers.</p>

  • 442

    19 December, 2016 - 8:22 am

    <p>There are so many other speaker systems on the market that provide similar results to Sonos, in a much more open and easy way.&nbsp; Sonos’ price really makes me wonder why these speakers are still a thing.&nbsp; When I can get similar results of quality and ease at 1/3 the price.</p>

    • 124

      Premium Member
      19 December, 2016 - 9:55 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#31106">In reply to </a><a href="../../users/Narg">Narg</a><a href="#31106">:</a></em></blockquote>
      <p>What others?&nbsp;&nbsp;Suggestions?&nbsp; </p>

    • 3268

      Premium Member
      20 December, 2016 - 3:42 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#31106">In reply to </a><a href="../../users/Narg">Narg</a><a href="#31106">:</a></em></blockquote>
      <p>The interesting thing about Sonos is the offer the most music services compared to others (http://www.sonos.com/en-us/streaming-music) and they are constantly updating features for their products, True Play is a good example.(http://www.sonos.com/en-us/trueplay-speaker-tuning-software)</p>
      <p>Also curious as to what other wireless hifi systems are easier than Sonos? &nbsp;I’m with lwetzel can you give us more detail in what results you are focusing on and how you are comparing the two?</p>

  • 8741

    19 December, 2016 - 1:52 pm

    <p>Sonos is overpriced and overrated.</p>
    <p>For significantly much cheaper, you can add Chromecast Audio to existing speakers in your house and get Sonos-like features without being exclusively locked down to Sonos or Spotify.</p>
    <p>In fact, today I’d recommend Chromecast enabled speakers over Sonos. It’s the more open solution. And it works on virtually any music or audio streaming service not just a select few.</p>
    <p>And if you have Google Home you can cast music to Chromecast enabled devices with your voice.</p>

    • 8121

      21 December, 2016 - 12:55 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#31162">In reply to </a><a href="../../users/mystilleef">mystilleef</a><a href="#31162">:</a></em></blockquote>
      <p>Your recommendation is based on the assumption that nice sounding speakers are located in all of the locations. Costs are quite different factoring in descent sounding speakers comparable to the sonos.That flawed thinking is common on the internet.</p>

  • 1792

    19 December, 2016 - 2:27 pm

    <p>Personally I use Gramofon with Spotify. Plugs into my ancient amp and speakers. Does a decent job for the price.&nbsp;</p>

  • 6750

    20 December, 2016 - 1:57 pm

    <p><em>Though I find Sonos Connector to be terribly designed and hard to use, it does let you mix and match playlists from multiple services. But who really needs that feature?</em></p>
    <p>My experience is people who are not technophiles like having everything centralised in one place. It is simpler to explain how to use it.&nbsp;</p>

  • 9310

    22 December, 2016 - 2:16 am

    <p>In my view Sonos is a superior solution. Value for money. The speakers are of high quality and what you get for the price is incredible sound. I actually find the Sonos controller easy and intuitive (at least the iPhone version). I agree that centralizing multiple service is a great plus.</p>
    <p>The only unit I am not sold on is the sound bar. I prefer Sonos for music.</p>
    <p>Just visited London, and admired the giant Tube ads for Sonos. Got me wanting more units.</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC