Just a question I have some older PCs that a customer has is there any version of windows 10 like light or embedded that are less resource intensive than windows 10 Pro.
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#291076"><em>In reply to christian.hvid:</em></a></blockquote><p>I think it's a bit early to claim that S mode can't make things worse over time. Theories abound for Windows alleged slowdown, but nothing has been definitively proven. If we don't know why a slowdown occurs, we can hardly say that S mode will prevent it.</p>
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#291183"><em>In reply to christian.hvid:</em></a></blockquote><p>I think the registry theory has been pretty much debunked. </p><p><br></p><p>While it's true that individual update daemons require more bandwidth than a single Store updater, the single updater uses bandwidth too and it will require more bandwidth as the number of Store applications are installed. </p>
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#291006"><em>In reply to wright_is:</em></a></blockquote><p>I agree. In fact, there are a number of comments on Amazon by people who purchased low-end Windows 10 PCs (with a small eMMC) that complain that they don't have enough disk space to get Windows 10 automatic updates to install. </p>