Amazon Wins EU Tax Case

The EU General Court this morning overruled a 2017 judgment that ordered Amazon to pay $300 million in unpaid taxes. The European Commission (EC) had charged that Amazon received special treatment from the Luxembourg tax authority and paid fewer taxes than it should have over a several-year period.

“[The EC] did not prove to the requisite legal standard that there was an undue reduction of the tax burden of a European subsidiary of the Amazon group,” the judges said in their ruling for Amazon.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Amazon had been funneling its EU-based revenues through an entity called Amazon EU SARL which then paid drastically reduced royalties to an untaxed Luxembourg-based parent company called Amazon Europe Holding Technologies SCS, reducing its taxable income from the bloc. Amazon has since changed the way it conducts business in the EU.

This is the second major legal defeat for European Union competition chief Margrethe Vestager, who is actively trying to curb the dominance of the biggest U.S. technology firms for a variety of antitrust reasons. Last year, the EU General Court overthrew a $15 billion tax order against Apple in Ireland on appeal.

“[This decision] is in line with our long-standing position that we followed all applicable laws and that Amazon received no special treatment,” an Amazon statement reads.

“We will carefully study the judgment and reflect on possible next steps,” Ms. Vestager said. Among those steps, of course, is an appeal of this ruling. Doing so makes sense: The EC has several tax-related cases pending against U.S. firms like Nike and Starbucks, as well as Fiat Chrysler, which is owned by a multinational firm.

But the EC could also pursue new tax laws that will explicitly tax big technology firms at a higher rate. “We need to seize the momentum to progress towards fair taxation at all levels,” Ms. Vestager said this morning.

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 11 comments

  • glenn8878

    12 May, 2021 - 11:44 am

    <p>Maybe they need to write better laws. These tax shelters must be outlawed.</p>

    • Greg Green

      12 May, 2021 - 5:21 pm

      <p>Legislators are amateurs when it comes to writing tax laws, it’s something they seldom do. Then corporations hire professional accountants and tax lawyers who have worked their entire adult lives to interpret the tax laws. It’s not a fair fight.</p>

  • scovious

    12 May, 2021 - 2:19 pm

    <p>That’s yet another shiesty move from Amazon. If only tech giants paid fair taxes like their customers do…</p>

    • Elwood P Suggins

      12 May, 2021 - 3:39 pm

      <p>Ya sure… like you, me, Amazon customers and everybody else don’t take advantage of every nook and cranny available to us to reduce our own tax bills. The only difference being scale… instead of $10s, $100s and $1000s – Amazon deals with $1Ms, $10Ms and $100Ms.</p>

      • Pierre Masse

        12 May, 2021 - 8:13 pm

        <p>Do you place people in power to write tax law? Do you spend hundred of millions to lobby those who doesn’t come from your stable? Do you pay less tax than your secretary? Do you place your money in other countries. Do you have a department full of lawyers and accountants who do just that all day long? I don’t think it is just a question of scale. It’s an ideology : Get everything, leave nothing.</p>

    • Paul Thurrott

      Premium Member
      13 May, 2021 - 9:56 am

      Amazon is a publicly-traded company. Its shareholders demand that it maximize profits, and one way to do that is to take maximum advantage of the tax laws. We do that as individuals, too. If the tax laws are poorly written, it behooves them to take advantage.

      On the flipside, that means that countries/etc. need to make sure that’s not possible. But that’s not on Amazon.

  • dftf

    13 May, 2021 - 6:16 am

    <p>Has the EU ever been successful in any of the tax cases?</p><p><br></p><p>To my memory, haven’t they gone-after Apple, Microsoft, Facebook and Alphabet (aka Google’s parent) in the past also, and I can’t recall any wins?</p>

    • dftf

      13 May, 2021 - 9:40 am

      <p>A friend of mine has reminded me that they also went-after Starbucks previously, also…</p>

      • Paul Thurrott

        Premium Member
        13 May, 2021 - 10:00 am

        I literally mention Starbucks in this article.

        • dftf

          13 May, 2021 - 10:36 am

          <p>Apologies, yes, I see it</p>

  • bkkcanuck

    17 May, 2021 - 4:24 pm

    <p>The courts are making the right decision. You do not change the rules and make them retroactive years before. Should they be paying more? Yes, but that is up to the legislative bodies to enact.</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2023 Thurrott LLC