Firefox 57 Hits Beta, is Renamed to Firefox Quantum

The next major release of Firefox is such an improvement that Mozilla decided to change the name. So instead of going by the unimpressive moniker Firefox 57, this release will instead be called Firefox Quantum. And it is available in both Beta and Developer Edition versions today.

“Our engineering team has been relentless in their focus on making Firefox incredibly fast,” Mozilla’s Nick Nguyen explains. “Firefox Quantum is such a big leap forward that you’ll feel it instantly, just browsing your favorite websites.”

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Firefox Quantum has one mission and one mission only: To take down the market leader, Google Chrome. And the best way to get there, Mozilla says, is to offer better performance and memory usage than Chrome.

I’m surprised to say I could notice the difference in an afternoon of testing the Beta version of Firefox Quantum: The browser really does feel quite snappy. Noticeably snappy.

Mozilla says that Firefox Quantum is “often perceivably faster” than Google Chrome, and it offers up a video (above) that demonstrates this prowess. The speed gains come from a variety of changes, including support for multiple CPU cores on both desktop and mobile, a new “super fast” CSS engine, giving priority to the currently-displayed tab, and a year’s worth of performance tuning.

Firefox Quantum also provides a sleek new user experience that Mozilla calls Photon.

“With the new design, Firefox leaps ahead with a new interface that reflects today’s reality of High DPI displays and users who are more task focused than they’ve ever been,” Nguyen writes. “Users will be impressed by the modern new design that puts their needs first. Photon doesn’t just look good, it’s also smarter. If you’re using Photon on a Windows PC with a touch display, the menus change size based on whether you click with a mouse or touch with a finger.”

The design is minimalist and, I think, attractive, with hard edges and square tabs. It looks more modern than Google Chrome, with its weird trapezoidal tabs, and is more akin, design-wise, to Microsoft Edge.

I like the look and speed of this browser, and of course the mobile sync stuff is huge. But like Microsoft Edge, it still lacks desktop integration for web apps, which makes it less than ideal (until Progressive Web Apps can be acquired through the Store in Windows 10, when all bets are off). But you may want to give it a shot: If you’ve not looked at Firefox in a while, this release may surprise you.

Firefox Quantum will ship publicly to all Firefox users to November 14. But you can test it now in both Beta and Developer Preview versions on Windows, Mac, Android, and iOS.

 

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 22 comments

  • Angusmatheson

    26 September, 2017 - 3:32 pm

    <p>I hate when they give products meaningless cool sounding names. What does “Quantum” mean in a browser? And Apple with the stupid A11 Bionic. What does that mean? If your product is awesome, it will speak for itself. It is lame, no cool, space-age name save it.</p>

    • markbyrn

      Premium Member
      26 September, 2017 - 4:03 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#183514"><em>In reply to Angusmatheson:</em></a><em> What does Microsoft Quantum Computing mean?</em></blockquote><p><br></p>

    • lvthunder

      Premium Member
      26 September, 2017 - 5:51 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#183514"><em>In reply to Angusmatheson:</em></a></blockquote><p>Things have to have names. The A10 had a name too, but I don't remember what it was.</p>

      • rameshthanikodi

        26 September, 2017 - 8:58 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#183541"><em>In reply to lvthunder:</em></a></blockquote><p>A10 Fusion. Kinda dumb, but whatever.</p>

    • Winner

      26 September, 2017 - 11:20 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#183514"><em>In reply to Angusmatheson:</em></a></blockquote><p>So is your car the Ford Four Wheeled Vehicle Model 5?</p>

  • Martin Pelletier

    Premium Member
    26 September, 2017 - 3:52 pm

    <p>Ah, another incentive to Google to do better hehe.</p>

  • hrlngrv

    Premium Member
    26 September, 2017 - 5:39 pm

    <p>It's a gamble. Photon may be sleek, but it could also drive away a lot of long-time users who have so far been able to customize the Firefox UI far more comprehensively than any other browser allows. Photon will cut that off. In my case, I'll probably move to Opera.</p><p>Also, Mozilla's current Australis rounded tabs are far weirder than Chrome's tabs, but Mozilla developers have never understood the aphorism about pots calling kettles black.</p><p>As for desktop integration, it's not built into Firefox, but it can be hacked by adapting the Linux Ice utility to Windows.</p>

  • NazmusLabs

    26 September, 2017 - 7:01 pm

    <p>We NEED Firefox and Edge to succeed, for the sake of web standards. These are the only two major browsers that uses an engine that isn't remotely related to Blink and Webkit.</p><p><br></p><p>Otherwise, we risk another IE6.</p>

    • skane2600

      27 September, 2017 - 2:08 am

      <blockquote><a href="#183551"><em>In reply to NazmusLabs:</em></a></blockquote><p>The concern for web standards seems often to be idealistically motivated. From a business perspective, the smart thing to do back when IE was dominant was to make sure the site worked with that browser and then if time permitted, try to get them to work on the other browsers. But many developers at the time weren't really thinking about it from a business perspective. </p>

    • Win74ever

      28 September, 2017 - 3:54 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#183551"><em>In reply to NazmusLabs:</em></a></blockquote><p><br></p><p>Yep. But they didn't update IE6 for years and years. Chrome is always updated to new web standards.</p>

  • bassoprofundo

    Premium Member
    26 September, 2017 - 7:24 pm

    <p>This is at the cost of jettisoning all of the "legacy" extensions… </p><p><br></p><p>https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-add-technology-modernizing?as=u&amp;utm_source=inproduct</p><p><br></p><p>Any browser is going to run faster with no addons. :P</p>

  • slerched

    Premium Member
    26 September, 2017 - 8:01 pm

    <p>I use every browser. Except IE. </p><p><br></p><p>I've been using beta and dev builds of FF for years now. </p><p><br></p><p>Losing LastPass has been a PITA but they assured me a compatible version would be available when FF moves to production. </p><p><br></p><p>AdBlock still works which means once LP is compatible again, I'll be good. </p><p><br></p><p>I use Opera to get around YouTube region restrictions. The VPN option they have is fast and free. </p><p><br></p><p><br></p>

  • rameshthanikodi

    26 September, 2017 - 8:59 pm

    <p>I tried it, and while it is faster, I think Chrome and Edge still feels faster than Firefox. But overall it's still a great improvement for Firefox.</p>

  • zorb56

    Premium Member
    26 September, 2017 - 9:19 pm

    <p>I have always used Firefox, but I fear that it is headed down the road of a closed and uninteresting system. I've tried to switch to Edge in recent weeks exclusively for the additional Microsoft Rewards you get for browsing with it, but I always seem to need Firefox for something.</p>

    • hrlngrv

      Premium Member
      26 September, 2017 - 9:53 pm

      <p><a href="#183571"><em>In reply to zorb56:</em></a></p><p>Firefox ESR will give you until next June to find something else. Looks like that may have to be Pale Moon unless Firefox 57 drives off so many users Mozilla is forced to relent. I wouldn't count on that.</p>

  • AlexKven

    27 September, 2017 - 2:08 am

    <p>Yay! Now Firefox is faster than Chrome sometimes but not other times. How impressive!</p>

  • Tony Barrett

    27 September, 2017 - 5:57 am

    <p>I hope it really improves Firefox's memory usage, because it's pretty poor at the moment. I regularly have &gt;15 tabs open, and Firefox is consuming 4-5GB. Chrome's per-tab process sandboxing is better, and it makes it easier to locate resource hogging sites, but it's still not perfect. </p><p>I honestly think browser memory usage has got progressively worse since sites starting loading up with ads. It slows down page loading, and uses huge amounts of resource.</p>

  • Kadren

    03 October, 2017 - 4:50 am

    <p>Mozilla is probably my last beloved browser creator. <a href="https://software.informer.com/Stories/mozillas-upcoming-firefox-quantum-to-be-faster-than-chrome.html&quot; target="_blank">Quantum</a> looks miles above anything that Google has done recently. Not to mention the laughable lack of innovation and improvement in <a href="https://macdownload.informer.com/Mac-Stories/apple-launches-macos-high-sierra.html&quot; target="_blank">High Sierra</a> and <a href="https://macdownload.informer.com/Mac-Stories/safaris-latest-version-tries-to-find-problematic-websites.html&quot; target="_blank">Safari</a>. It's alsmost sad seeing how the big companies loust touch with tech and times. Google and Apple are way to bloated and fat to do anything good. I hope Mozilla stays sharp, and Quantum blows my mind.</p>

    • hrlngrv

      Premium Member
      10 October, 2017 - 3:46 am

      <p><a href="#191152"><em>In reply to Kadren:</em></a></p><p>You should give Opera a try. It seems faster than Chrome, and for me, its UI is nicer than Chrome's or Quantum's. FWLIW.</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC