Microsoft Ignite: Teams Heads to the Metaverse

Not willing to be left out of the hype around the metaverse, Microsoft has announced Mesh for Microsoft Teams for a new generation of 2D and 3D virtual meetings.

“As computing becomes embedded in the real world, the real world is being embedded in computing,” Microsoft corporate vice president Jared Spataro explains. “That’s Mesh, the metaverse platform. We’re taking that experience and building Mesh right into Teams, recreating a lot of what we value about being together and extending productivity beyond what was previously possible.”

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Mesh provides users with personalized avatars with AI-powered movements and gestures that help bring your physical presence into a meeting when your camera is off. And businesses will be able to create immersive spaces that resemble conference rooms, design centers, networking lounges, and other real-world places “to enhance camaraderie, spark creativity, and foster serendipitous water-cooler connections.,” Microsoft says.

Mesh builds on existing Teams features like Together mode and Presenter view, and it’s designed to make remote and hybrid meetings more collaborative and immersive by signaling to participants that they are together in the same virtual space.

Mesh for Microsoft Teams rolls out in 2022 and will work across PCs, smartphones, and Mixed Reality headsets.

It’s all coming together,” Microsoft Technical Fellow Alex Kipman says. “As a company whose focus is on productivity, on knowledge workers, it’s something that customers are really asking us for, and it’s coupled with the vision of mixed reality that we’ve been working on for 12 years.”

Additionally, Microsoft announced several other new Teams features, including new hybrid meeting experiences powered by new partner hardware, shared channel meetings, new webinar and broadcasting capabilities, new third-party apps that integrate with Teams (including Atlassian Jira Cloud, SAP, and ServiceNow), and a redesigned Teams Store, among others.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 53 comments

  • behindmyscreen

    02 November, 2021 - 11:19 am

    <p>Just…..No</p>

  • victorchinn

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 11:48 am

    <p>Legless in Seattle ? </p>

    • christianwilson

      Premium Member
      02 November, 2021 - 12:04 pm

      <p>Legs are coming in the 25H2 metaverse update. </p>

  • bats

    02 November, 2021 - 11:59 am

    <p>LOL….this post cracks me up. Not gonna happen anytime soon or in this generation, with respect to the overall general computer-using public. The one that really cracks me up is the "mixed reality headsets." LOL….yeah, right. Anything that is a wearable that can physically alter the way a person looks is practically DOA. These things are nothing but toys.</p>

    • winlonghorn

      02 November, 2021 - 3:31 pm

      <p>Yes because people don’t love wearing glasses and nobody loves vr at all! …….riiiighhhtttt!! Ugh why don’t people think before they speak? lol</p>

  • christianwilson

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 12:02 pm

    <p>Cyberpunk authors have been trying to warn us about the metaverse for decades, not romanticize about it. We weren’t listening. </p>

  • beckoningeagle

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 12:14 pm

    <p>The cloud is no more! Long live the cloud! </p>

  • glassman1234

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 12:16 pm

    <p>’Ready Player One’ anyone.</p>

    • daveevad

      04 November, 2021 - 7:18 am

      <p>I think they spelled "OASIS" wrong…lol</p>

  • behindmyscreen

    02 November, 2021 - 12:20 pm

    <p>Now stupid people can say stupid things on a site about technoloy.</p>

    • waethorn

      02 November, 2021 - 2:07 pm

      <p>At least the rest of the world leaders won’t be able to smell his dirty diaper over the Interwebs.</p>

      • bluvg

        02 November, 2021 - 2:11 pm

        <p>This comment says far more about you than any criticism you’re trying to make.</p>

        • waethorn

          02 November, 2021 - 4:13 pm

          <p>Let’s Go Brandon!</p>

      • StevenLayton

        02 November, 2021 - 2:34 pm

        <p>You might not believe in him as a leader, but the rest of us thank god he believes in science and climate change.</p>

        • waethorn

          02 November, 2021 - 4:12 pm

          <p>That’s why he took 85 cars, a C-130, Air Force 1, and 3 other jets to COP26….and fell asleep during meetings.</p>

          • StevenLayton

            02 November, 2021 - 5:07 pm

            <p>But hey, well done for drawing us all into politics when we didn’t need to. It’s funny how easy it is. </p>

            • bluvg

              02 November, 2021 - 6:05 pm

              <p>While I wish this site had a delete/edit comment feature, this is one instance where it’s useful. "…the mind of a fool broadcasts folly."</p>

          • nbplopes

            02 November, 2021 - 5:18 pm

            <p>I know, he should have sniffed some Trump stuff.</p>

          • Donte

            02 November, 2021 - 7:57 pm

            <p>400+ private jets were used to ferry leaders to the conference. Trying to speed up their predictions I guess.</p>

        • waethorn

          02 November, 2021 - 4:15 pm

          <p>Oh and did I forget to mention that nobody wanted to stand beside him, and he was segregated off to the side for the official group photo, and when the official photogs were done, all the masks came off?</p><p><br></p><p>SCIENCE!</p>

        • polloloco51

          02 November, 2021 - 8:29 pm

          <p>That is a good point! Not to forget, he understands the law, and was a lawyer too! </p><p><br></p><p>Something, his predecessor has absolutely no understanding of, other than to break! </p>

  • kcarson97404

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 12:39 pm

    <p>You can barely get people to even turn on their cameras on a Teams call today. I doubt anyone will want to have an avatar in a virtual conference room. This is a technology solution in search of a problem. </p>

    • mefree

      05 November, 2021 - 10:52 am

      <p>I’ve been working from home for most of my career, aka, before it was cool. Honestly, I think people would rather have an avatar than turn on a camera. Camera tends to show too much (aka their room is a mess, etc, etc.) Personally I think avatars would get used more than video.</p>

  • Donte

    02 November, 2021 - 1:18 pm

    <p>Please bloat Teams Up more. It keeps Zoom alive at my company. </p>

  • nine54

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 1:58 pm

    <p>Always amusing how when defining a "VR" environment, people bring in constraints from the real, physical world. Why would we need physical conference rooms and tables in a virtual meeting? I don’t need my avatar to sit around a virtual conference table to have an effective meeting. Now, if some of the participants are attending in person, I can see value in better incorporating the folks attending remotely. But I don’t see the point of bringing the physical into the virtual. </p>

    • bluvg

      02 November, 2021 - 2:09 pm

      <p>Maybe it has to start with skeuomorphism to take off, then change later (like with the iPhone)? </p>

    • ulrichr

      02 November, 2021 - 7:04 pm

      <p>Or perhaps they want to sell the ‘familiar’ before they launch into the ‘art of the possible'</p>

  • bluvg

    02 November, 2021 - 2:06 pm

    <p>Many companies are pouring resources into this. Apple has a very big announcement planned, apparently. Will it flop like 3D TV? Maybe, but I wouldn’t be too quick to pass it off as a fad. Wait for better execution.</p>

  • harmjr

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 2:08 pm

    <p>Is it just me or does these online experiences for meeting just feel like a even greater waste of time then doing a zoom meeting. </p>

    • Cosmocronos

      02 November, 2021 - 3:45 pm

      <p>Indeed, it reminds me of the original, and the best, ICQ: simple and linear messaging; down the road more and more features were added and while some were useful the original simplicity and effectiveness of the concept was lost.</p>

  • blue77star

    02 November, 2021 - 2:25 pm

    <p>What a boring company Microsoft became. They got nothing to interest me. Over the time as they released horrible OS such as Windows 8, 10, 11 ended up my entire household running on iOS, Mac OS, and Linux except only one machine running Windows 10 where I game. Windows is really on a life support called gaming.</p>

    • Mike Brady

      05 November, 2021 - 2:32 pm

      <p>Bye, Felisha.</p>

  • Tomasz Sowinski

    02 November, 2021 - 2:28 pm

    <p>If Microsoft plays it well, it may become a success, just like Hololens.</p>

  • vladimir

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 2:56 pm

    <p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">“to enhance camaraderie, spark creativity, and foster serendipitous water-cooler connections” we need IRL meetings. I just resumed working in person and I just realized how much we lost with the move to remote working. What is really needed is to develop new ways to enhance meeting rooms to allow blending of irl and virtual experiences</span></p>

  • cchubbuck

    02 November, 2021 - 4:08 pm

    <p>I really hope my company blocks this feature.</p>

    • LocalPCGuy

      02 November, 2021 - 5:38 pm

      <p>Unless you have 20 year old managers, there is a good chance that the feature will be frowned upon, after everyone gets a good laugh.</p>

  • rmlounsbury

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 4:50 pm

    <p>I don’t entirely understand this obsession with digital avatars in work based applications. I don’t even get it in social media oriented apps to that end. </p><p><br></p><p>I suppose there is some benefit to it with users that are disconnected with the office and not coming in. It’s weird to me. If I want to connect a video chat is sufficient and the digital avatars will never replace the in person meetings you had when you where in the office. </p>

    • boltupright

      02 November, 2021 - 6:23 pm

      <p>Conference call by voice with presentation screen &amp; some raising hand system is all we need.</p><p>And a lamp.</p>

  • swiftnc

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 4:50 pm

    <p>Paul, how do I block and report crap posts by waethorn?</p>

  • red.radar

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 4:57 pm

    <p>How did this even see the light of day? Embarrassing…</p>

  • j5

    Premium Member
    02 November, 2021 - 5:12 pm

    <p>SMDH</p>

  • Craig Smith

    02 November, 2021 - 6:06 pm

    <p>When a person pays a monthly premium to troll a technology website. Cute.</p>

  • clutem1987

    02 November, 2021 - 6:25 pm

    <p>Brings “this could have been an email” to a whole new level </p>

    • mefree

      05 November, 2021 - 10:49 am

      <p>I typically say "this could have been a message on Teams."</p>

  • BizTechSherpa

    02 November, 2021 - 8:48 pm

    <p>tldr: blah blah blah…mesh…we have a a metaverse…blah blah blah…avatar…</p>

  • Oreo

    02 November, 2021 - 9:28 pm

    <p>Big fat no. I don’t care about the actual product, it suffices that it is Facebook that is building this. I don’t want to touch it or try it. </p>

  • iantrem

    Premium Member
    03 November, 2021 - 6:32 am

    <p>Wasn’t there a platform doing this 10-15 years ago? Another Life? Second Life? I know somebody tried to get a meeting going in it and it took that long to sort everyone out with the technology the meeting was over. Why wouldn’t people just use a Teams meeting with video?</p>

    • christianwilson

      Premium Member
      03 November, 2021 - 9:44 am

      <p>Yes, Second Life. I remember a lot of hype around that service, similar to the metaverse hype now. It still exists, though I’ve heard nothing about it in years. </p>

    • behindmyscreen

      04 November, 2021 - 8:28 am

      <p>Second Life wasn’t doing this. They just had some weird on-line 3d world. VR wasn’t part of it.</p>

  • nbplopes

    03 November, 2021 - 9:55 am

    <p>The insistence of tech companies over VR, even after years of public rejection is showing.</p><p><br></p><p>As it stands no company or organization needs it. Solves no problem not to mention it being very inconvenient. The practical application are still niche.</p><p><br></p><p>So why the brain wash?</p><p><br></p><p>Well, <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">VR is the corporate tech capitalist nirvana. With it, if it sticks somehow, gain full control over people environments. They control what you see, what you look like, how you sound like, where you go, with whom you go, heck even what you say by potentially impersonating you .. That is why FB and in part MS are pushing this.</span></p><p><br></p>

  • anoldamigauser

    Premium Member
    03 November, 2021 - 10:53 am

    <p>This seems like a jump the shark moment for Microsoft.</p><p>It will do nothing to improve communication or productivity. </p>

  • polloloco51

    03 November, 2021 - 7:34 pm

    <p>I hope "Mesh for Microsoft Teams" has animal avatars! I would love to drop into a meeting as cat or a chicken! LOL</p><p><br></p><p>Microsoft could actually, take this idea, and make an MMO immersive game too! </p><p><br></p>

  • roundaboutskid

    05 November, 2021 - 5:16 am

    <p>It does not have to be that fancy with avatars and 3D. Look at the brilliant simplicity of Wonder. That’s how you do it if you want those "water cooler connections". They do it right.</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC