Saw this on reddit.
https://mondaynote.com/fiction-who-killed-windows-phone-af7491d4a363
skane2600
<p>"The gross failure of what once was the most powerful and richest tech company on the planet led to a search for a platform killer."</p><p><br></p><p>We should all be so lucky to earn the profits from the "gross failure" of MS.</p><p><br></p><p>"While Microsoft treated the emerging mobile devices as a sideshow, Google and Apple forged ahead with modern operating systems that ran circles around Windows Mobile, itself a Windows CE descendant."</p><p><br></p><p>As a PC replacement, mobile devices devices remain mostly a sideshow .</p><p><br></p>
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#152202"><em>In reply to Dan:</em></a></blockquote><p>Photography? Love those candid shots of my office wall I took with my PC back in the day. But seriously, the percentage of people who use their phones for some of these activities and the degree to which they do it relative to the PC is limited. IMO, only a masochist would perform home refinancing on a smartphone. </p><p><br></p><p>I don't dispute the write-down but mobile is only one part of MS. Had MS treated mobile as even more of a sideshow they would not only have avoided wasting money on Nokia, but they would probably be doing better on the desktop if they hadn't tried to "mobilize" Windows starting with Windows 8.</p>
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#152320"><em>In reply to Dan:</em></a></blockquote><p>In the present MS is still making a lot of money. PC sales are down but that's not the same as PC usage. Tablets were the best hope for PC replacements, but their sales have stalled. Even phones with 6 inch displays are still too small to be viable PC replacements. </p>
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#152347"><em>In reply to hrlngrv:</em></a></blockquote><p>By "best hope" I didn't mean to imply great hope. However unlikely tablets are to replace PCs, smartphones are even less likely to do so. That's not to say that tablets are more popular than smartphones, just that their form-factor is better suited to productivity work, which IMO, has always been the core purpose of Windows (with the possible exception of major games).</p>
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#152430"><em>In reply to hrlngrv:</em></a></blockquote><p>"Smartphones eliminated any reason for households to have more PCs than people. "</p><p><br></p><p>When was that ever a thing? </p>
skane2600
<blockquote><a href="#152381"><em>In reply to Dan:</em></a></blockquote><p>If we classify PCs to be outside the consumer space, Intel, like MS, has never been a major player in consumer electronics. Getting out of the wearable business is probably good advice for just about everyone. We don't even know if Apple has recouped the cost of their watch development and they're the market leader. </p>
Supatra
<p> Thanks for the good information.</p><p><a href="https://goo.gl/7YKexK" target="_blank">gclub casino</a></p>