Google Continues Insane Lobbying Against New Legislation

Posted on June 7, 2022 by Paul Thurrott in Google with 10 Comments

The U.S. Congress is considering legislation that would finally curb the power of Big Tech. Naturally, Google is against it. And as it does so often, literally, again and again, it is lashing out publicly against what it calls “anti-tech.”

“We’re concerned that Congress is considering legislation that would compromise Google’s ability to keep users secure by default, as well as break popular features in products like Search and Maps,” Google vice president Royal Hansen writes in Google’s latest screed. “As experts gather for the RSA Conference this week, I wanted to share my perspective as a security professional on the real risks that this legislation poses for US security.”

Google taking a pro-privacy and pro-security stance may strike some as amusing given the company’s primary business model. But it’s a logical enough position. As Hansen notes, the firm blocks 100 million phishing attempts and tracks over 270 government-backed threat actors from over 50 countries every single day. Its entire business is online.

But Hansen claims that the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, which is designed to prevent Big Tech firms from favoring their own services over those of rivals or partners, will somehow impact security. I’ll let him make that argument.

“[The bill] could hurt our ability to make quick decisions to keep our products secure, requiring us to ask: would thwarting a potential bad actor violate the law and open us up to legal liability?” he writes. “Even pausing to ask the question would leave millions of users vulnerable for precious minutes while a potential security threat persists. And when it comes to cybersecurity, every second counts.”

That this argument is specious is obvious. After all, Google discriminates against rival services to improve its revenues, not to improve security. And it’s not hard to imagine that Google arguing in the future about an integration that was solely security-related would sway antitrust regulators. After all, this isn’t about security. It’s about fairness.

I’m embarrassed for Google. This is not a good look, and to claim, among other things, that this legislation would have somehow prevented it from aiding Ukraine in the wake of the Russian invasion isn’t just beyond the pale, it’s disgusting.

Join the discussion!


Don't have a login but want to join the conversation? Become a Thurrott Premium or Basic User to participate

Comments (10)

10 responses to “Google Continues Insane Lobbying Against New Legislation”

  1. LT1 Z51

    Guess "Don't Be Evil" is now "Just be Evil"

  2. navarac

    Google, in common with all big-tech, is only interested in the bottom line for it's investors. Absolutely no-one else at all.

    • mikegalos

      Unlike "all big-tech", Google isn't in the technology business. They give technology away below cost to sell user data to advertisers as a business. Note how very little success they and all of Alphabet have had at producing any other profitable businesses.

      Please don't confuse them with companies actually in the technology business.

      • sofan

        Apple is not tech company they are hardware company.

        Microsoft is not tech company they are subscription company.

        Google is not tech company they are advertising company

  3. SherlockHolmes

    Once the reputation is ruined, life is unabashed.

  4. rm

    Google makes me want The American Innovation and Choice Online Act put in today with their willingness to make up BS to stop it.

  5. anoldamigauser

    Google makes great products that I would gladly pay to use, but they have decided that selling my habits and interests to others is more lucrative. In the end, this just makes me go out of my way to avoid using their products, though I am sure they have much information simply because I communicate with those who do use their products.

    Screw the surveillance economy.

    • Zeppelyn56

      Well, after just returning from a two-week Scandanavian cruise and looking at my Google timeline for the period. Well apparently, I was flying for 386 hours, driving over 600 miles and when docked at Copenhagen, was told I was actually in Southampton and not once was I at sea. Great products, nah.

  6. brettscoast

    Disingenuous from Google at best.

  7. sscywong

    They could simply argue that "We are not a Tech company. We are an advertising company, so we should not be subject to legislations targeting Tech companies"