Samsung’s Galaxy Book2 is the newest addition to ARM-PC Family

While it’s likely fair to say that ARM-based Windows PCs haven’t caught on in a big way, that doesn’t mean that they are going to go the way of the Dodo. Samsung clearly sees the benefit with this type of a device and is announcing the Galaxy Book2.

Yes, it is Book2, not Book 2, and the always-connected PC features a Snapdragon 850 under the 12in 2160×1440 display, with 4GB of RAM, 128 GB of storage, two USB-C ports, microSD. 3.55 headphone jack, fingerprint sensor and battery life of up to 20hrs. Notably, Samsung says this battery life is with Windows 10 in S Mode.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The device does not come cheap and starts at $999, this is very much a premium PC running a Snapdragon chip; the big question will be the performance as the previous generation WOA devices were a bit slow with the older Snapdragon 835. The device becomes available on November 2nd and can be purchased at AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon stores.

The device will also utilize Samsung’s S Pen, that is included in the box, to take advantage of Windows 10’s inking support. Further, the keyboard is included as well which means even though $999 is not cheap, it is comparable to an entry-level Surface Pro 6.

And as you can guess from where this device will be sold, it does feature LTE connectivity.

The only question that matters with this device is the performance of the CPU. If the 850 is able to keep it on par with the comparable Intel chip, this will be a huge win for Microsoft as it looks for options for its hardware other than Intel.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 27 comments

  • dontbe evil

    18 October, 2018 - 11:36 am

    <p>nice to see more ARM Windows 2in1 coming</p>

    • roastedwookie

      19 October, 2018 - 11:31 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#354502">In reply to dontbe_evil:</a></em></blockquote><p>That no one is gonna buy, except for the windowscentral fanboys</p>

  • aelaan

    18 October, 2018 - 11:50 am

    <p>Here we see yet another failed device with a high, high price. It is already defeated before it came into the market.</p><p>A price tag around 599 would make this maybe more interesting. Samsung is out of touch with the market.</p><p>This device must be able to run a 4Ghz speed will it ever be comparable and Windows S is a limit consumers are not ready for. I am for hire for advice to these companies…. ;-)</p>

    • eric_rasmussen

      Premium Member
      18 October, 2018 - 1:01 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#354505">In reply to aelaan:</a></em></blockquote><p>These things are unable to run desktop software that was compiled for 64-bit, which could be an even bigger limitation than the fact that they ship with S Mode enabled.</p><p><br></p><p>For my workflow, an Android Book or Chrome Book would work better. For the price of this thing, though, a MacBook would be an even better investment. I don't think this Samsung device could run Visual Studio Code or any ssh client, which is something I would need. My needs obviously do not align with the general public, but neither does this thing's price tag.</p>

      • IanYates82

        Premium Member
        18 October, 2018 - 6:34 pm

        <blockquote><em><a href="#354533">In reply to Eric_Rasmussen:</a></em></blockquote><p>VS code runs on 32 bit Windows. </p><p>Same as SSH clients. </p><p><br></p><p>There aren't that many apps, particularly those you'd want on a tablet / small laptop, where they are only 64 bit. </p><p><br></p><p>There are other reasons to be wary of the device, but code &amp; SSH aren't among them. </p>

  • pachi

    18 October, 2018 - 11:54 am

    <p>I have the galaxy tabpro. It’s a core m and has an OLED screen. It’s okay…. I paid $350 for it though, that’s about what it’s worth. The keyboard sucks and already is broken and it is rarely even attached. And sitting on a shelf shouldn’t break it. </p><p><br></p><p>Does this even even have an OLED display???</p>

  • maethorechannen

    Premium Member
    18 October, 2018 - 11:59 am

    <p>I wonder what the target market for this device actually is. I suspect any advertisement will be full of beautiful twenty-somethings smiling away while they pretend to work at a coffee shop or at an office that looks like one, but is that really representative?</p>

  • locust infested orchard inc

    18 October, 2018 - 12:23 pm

    <p><a href="https://news.samsung.com/us/announcing-samsung-galaxy-book2/&quot; target="_blank" style="color: rgb(0, 110, 206);"><strong>Quote by Brad Sams, "…this is very much a premium PC running a Snapdragon chip</strong></a><strong style="color: rgb(0, 110, 206);">."</strong></p><p><br></p><p>This device sure is a premium PC (sic) with a wholesome mighty power of an unprecedented epic 4GB of RAM.</p>

  • beckerrt

    Premium Member
    18 October, 2018 - 12:26 pm

    <p>Any chance you or Paul might get to review this, Brad? Would love to see how the 850 performs. </p><p><br></p><p>If you ever wondered what an ARM-powered Surface would be like, here's your answer. </p>

  • Daekar

    18 October, 2018 - 12:27 pm

    <p>I would love to see you review this hardware. My first impulse is to be disappointed with the 4GB of RAM, but I will await your testing.</p>

    • wright_is

      Premium Member
      19 October, 2018 - 3:04 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#354524">In reply to Daekar:</a></em></blockquote><p>Even my 2017 smartphone came with 6GB RAM.</p>

  • skborders

    18 October, 2018 - 12:59 pm

    <p>1K is too expensive for this. It should be priced like a Surface Go.</p>

  • digiguy

    Premium Member
    18 October, 2018 - 7:42 pm

    <p>999 for 4GB of RAM? They went crazy… Even if it had a core i9… I got my Samsung notebook 9 (from which I am writing) with 16GB of RAM for 999$ on sale.</p>

  • skane2600

    18 October, 2018 - 9:49 pm

    <p>IMO, once you get beyond enthusiasts and technical people, ARM is unknown. Average users look at price, performance, and appearance. They don't care about the underlying technology. </p>

    • wright_is

      Premium Member
      19 October, 2018 - 3:05 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#354699">In reply to skane2600:</a></em></blockquote><p>I'm guessing this is mainly going to be used in business for special verticals, where the user is on the road for long periods and has a relatively / very small range of applications they use.</p>

      • skane2600

        19 October, 2018 - 12:53 pm

        <blockquote><em><a href="#354731">In reply to wright_is:</a></em></blockquote><p>Unless those "small range of applications" are exclusively the UWP version of MS Office apps, they won't run on Windows S. LoB apps or standard productivity programs based on UWP are extremely rare. </p><p><br></p><p>They'd have the option of upgrading to Windows 10 Pro which would allow them to run many 32-bit legacy applications and no 64-bit legacy applications. That's a lot of trouble to go to for a still limited solution when they could just go out and buy a laptop that does it all "out of the box" for less money. </p>

  • wright_is

    Premium Member
    19 October, 2018 - 3:02 am

    <p>It would be interesting to see how fast it would be, if Samsung used their Exynos processor as used in other Galaxy devices, instead of the Qualcomm, but I guess that would be too much work for Microsoft at this stage.</p>

  • FalseAgent

    19 October, 2018 - 3:21 am

    <p>I don't get it, why are these machines so expensive?</p>

  • PeterC

    19 October, 2018 - 3:42 am

    <p>I don’t see how Qualcomm will catch Apple up in chip capability. Looking at the 850 versus A12 stats is sobering. Unless MS can tune Win ARM to Qualcomm chips extremely quickly and overcome OS overhead they’re toast in performance terms, but that still requires Qualcomm to really speed up their design/development/manufacture schedule…. and Apple aren’t standing still and have a chip road map with iOS embedded into its chip design.</p><p><br></p><p>Anyways lovely Samsung hardware – performs slowly – and does It all day! </p><p><br></p><p>Why haven’t they used their own chips? Does it still relate to modem patents held by Qualcomm for the USA territory?</p>

    • jimchamplin

      Premium Member
      19 October, 2018 - 2:22 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#354739">In reply to PeterC:</a></em></blockquote><p>If that’s the case, the answer is simple. Decouple the CPU and the modem hardware in the US.</p>

  • roastedwookie

    19 October, 2018 - 11:29 am

    <p>Another $999 fail like HP's Envy X2</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC