Intel Debuts 11th-Generation Core Chips, New Logo

Today, Intel announced its 11th-generation Core processors for laptops alongside a new corporate logo and rebranding.

“Today we are excited to launch the world’s best processor for thin and light laptops: Our 11th [generation] Intel Core processor,” Intel’s Raja Koduri said during a virtual launch event.

Intel’s 11th-generation Core processors, previously codenamed Tiger Lake, will come in i3, i5, and i7 variants and a total of 9 different SKUs, or models across both its U- and Y-series. They ship with Intel’s new Xe integrated graphics, most with a more efficient and lower-power version that will help facilitate very thin and light PCs.

Like the previous-generation Core processors, the Tiger Lake chips are built on Intel’s 10-nanometer manufacturing process at a time when its competitors are delivering 7-nm designs and racing forward to 5- and even 3-nm designs. But Intel claims that its “SuperFin design” helps it provide faster processing speeds with lower power consumption than is typical at 10-nm.

Intel also debuted its second-generation Project Athena certification program, called Intel Evo, which guarantees that certified laptops will stay powered for at least 9 hours in real-world use, support fast charging (at least four hours of charge in 30 minutes, will wake in less than one second, and will utilize Wi-Fi 6 and Thunderbolt 4.

Finally, Intel also showed off its new corporate logo, which is just the third logo refresh in its history. It’s processor brands, like Core, Xeon, Iris, and Evo have all been subtly redesigned as well to work more naturally within Intel’s new visual branding.

Tagged with

Share post

Conversation 18 comments

  • rusty chameleon

    02 September, 2020 - 1:37 pm

    <p>There are some really compelling Ryzen-based laptops emerging out there.</p><p>Seems like Intel has really lost its mojo.</p>

    • winner

      02 September, 2020 - 4:10 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#566733">In reply to rusty chameleon:</a></em></blockquote><p>it's just sort of crazy, how in the world did it happen that Intel had such a lead and got so complacent?</p>

      • proftheory

        Premium Member
        02 September, 2020 - 5:56 pm

        <blockquote><em><a href="#566786">In reply to Winner:</a></em></blockquote><p>Isn't the first time. I remember there was another CPU maker that come up with a 64bit instruction set before them.</p>

        • sandy

          Premium Member
          02 September, 2020 - 9:41 pm

          <blockquote><em><a href="#566864">In reply to proftheory:</a></em></blockquote><p>Intel were forced by the market to adopt AMD64 (now more generically known as x86-64, or by Microsoft's shorthand x64).</p><p><br></p><p>Intel became huge &amp; lazy (it happens), remember their Core architecture was from a small company in Israel they'd acquired, before which they were floundering with the ridiculously high clock speed, high heat/high power usage &amp; low performance Pentium 4 era chips.</p>

          • oscar90

            03 September, 2020 - 4:20 am

            <blockquote><em><a href="#566911">In reply to Sandy:</a></em></blockquote><p>They were forced by Microsoft to adopt AMD64 as the de facto industry standard in a sit down in which they made it very clear that they are not gonna support both of them.</p>

            • Username

              04 September, 2020 - 3:22 pm

              <blockquote><a href="#566947"><em>In reply to oscar90:</em></a><em> </em>They were forced by Microsoft to adopt AMD64&nbsp;</blockquote><p><br></p><p>Nonsense. The whole point of HAL is to be hardware implementation independent. AMD’s x64 won because it was backward compatible with x32, Intel’s Itanium wasn’t.</p>

              • MachineGunJohn

                07 September, 2020 - 1:01 am

                <blockquote><a href="#567763"><em>In reply to </em></a><em>W</em>indows 2008 R2 ran great on itanium because of the HAL.They already supported both </blockquote>

  • RobertJasiek

    02 September, 2020 - 2:08 pm

    <p>So far, the promised Y with 4.5W for tablets are missing!</p>

  • solomonrex

    02 September, 2020 - 2:26 pm

    <p>This is a tough announcement to make after they Osborned it by announcing a collaboration with other fabs. I'm sure they'll be slightly better than last year's Intel-based laptops, but Apple is going to drop very soon now and show them up.</p>

  • shawnthebeachy

    02 September, 2020 - 2:40 pm

    <p>Actually like the new logo.</p><p><br></p><p>Also last paragraph: "<strong style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><em>It’s</em></strong><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> processor brands…" :P</span></p>

  • glenn8878

    02 September, 2020 - 3:32 pm

    <p>I hope fanless, dual screens, high performance, thin and lightweight laptops are in the near future. And all day battery longevity, high resolution, and USB-C. And high capacity SSD. And Windows 10 that supports it.</p>

  • dougkinzinger

    Premium Member
    02 September, 2020 - 4:10 pm

    <p>Nice they let their Platinum Partners know this… :D</p>

  • winbookxl2

    Premium Member
    02 September, 2020 - 4:51 pm

    <p>Intel's new logo is refreshing to see, but I hope these processors help them reach the hurdle the need to go over to remain dominate in the CPU computing industry. </p><p><br></p><p>These processors would have been great in the refreshed Apple Macbook Pro and Macbook Air lineups.</p>

  • brettscoast

    Premium Member
    02 September, 2020 - 7:57 pm

    <p>Look forward to seeing how the new Xe integrated graphics performs in real world scenarios. The promise of improved battery life, performance is always welcome. </p>

  • sandy

    Premium Member
    02 September, 2020 - 9:36 pm

    <p>Any mention of reducing microarchitectural data sampling &amp; sidechannel security vulnerabilities (spectre, meltdown, etc.), without reducing performance? Oh and securing Thunderbolt? (I'm thinking of DMA being used to read-off encryption keys &amp; passwords directly from RAM just by plugging in a TB device.)</p><p><br></p><p>Rebranding can often be a warning when a company is in a downward spiral (let's distract everyone from how our business isn't doing as good as they'd like by changing our logo or even name!).</p><p>The previous logo wasn't that old – and I didn't see anything wrong with it – while the new logo is barely that; it's just their name in a particular font with the . on the i being in a different colour.</p>

    • Elwood P Suggins

      03 September, 2020 - 1:08 pm

      <blockquote><em><a href="#566909">In reply to Sandy:</a></em></blockquote><p>Actually, the previous 'swoosh' logo was nearly 30 years old (time flies!) – it outlived the famous original 'dropped -e' Intel logo by more than a half-dozen years.</p><p><br></p><p>The 'swoosh' logo and 'Intel Inside' campaign of the early 90's kicked off a great ~10 year run by Intel… but I don't think history is going to repeat itself here.</p>

  • madthinus

    Premium Member
    03 September, 2020 - 8:09 am

    <p>These processors is truly exciting. Looking forward to the reviews.</p>

  • veermaharaj

    04 September, 2020 - 10:12 am

    <p>For a more detailed analysis, see Gamers Nexus video:</p><p><br></p><h1>Intel Won't Stop Talking About AMD: New Tiger Lake CPU Specs &amp; 11th Gen "Benchmarks"</h1><p><br></p><p>Also, id kill to see steve and paul do a video together.</p>


Stay up to date with the latest tech news from!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2023 BWW Media Group