The $400 Smartphone You Deserve (Premium)

Apple’s an interesting company. And it has always been able to generate positive press for doing next to nothing, like finally replacing the terrible butterfly keyboards that it tortured its MacBook customers with for years. Huzzah!

The iPhone SE falls into this same category. And it was interesting watching reviewers trying to outdo each other in praising the company for doing nothing particularly special. Yes, the iPhone SE starts at only $400. And that’s the end of anything good I have to say about it.

Not that there aren’t some other positives, of course. Many will point out the A13 processor, the same chip that Apple uses in its current flagships. Some will claim that they prefer small displays on their phones, or that the iPhone SE is an obvious choice for children. And it will be supported with updates for years, yes.

Whatever.

No product is completely pointless. But like the Surface Go 2, the iPhone SE suffers where it matters most, both today and in the future. This device has an old-fashioned design, which isn’t the problem in its own right, but rather that the display is so tiny it will be useless or hard to use for many. It has a tiny battery and just an OK camera. And that iOS that everyone is such a fan of suddenly, with a ton of problems that I guess we’re just going to ignore now because, hey, it’s only $400. It’s like we’ve lost sight of what’s important.

Here’s what I find to be more important.

An adequately sized display. If Apple just used an edge-to-edge design here and offer a Max/Plus-sized model too, the iPhone SE would be easier to recommend. This isn’t about design, it’s about usability. If you’re going to spend your day on a phone, the thing you look at is job one, not that processor behind the display.

Future-proofing is important too. I’ve always argued that the problem with Android not getting updates is a red herring, but whatever. Even the iPhone SE fans here will admit that we all complain about getting too many updates in Windows 10, but for some reason this is desirable on our phones. Did we all collectively forget how many updates, each requiring a reboot, that Apple shipped in the months after iOS 13, all designed to fix its many bugs and problems? I guess we did.

But future-proofing involves a lot of factors. The quality of the camera. The ability to use that size display over time. The amount of storage. The ease of signing-in. The quality of both the platform you’re using and the apps that run on top of it, and how that quality is impacted by, wait for it, the size of that display. It’s a matrix of things.

If the iPhone SE had been an iPhone 11 with a two-year-old chip for the same price as the phone Apple delivered, I’d applaud it because the chip isn’t a big deal. We’re at the point now where any mobile chipset from the past few years will work fine for years and years to come. An iPhone 11 SE would have made a lot more sense. I mean,...

Gain unlimited access to Premium articles.

With technology shaping our everyday lives, how could we not dig deeper?

Thurrott Premium delivers an honest and thorough perspective about the technologies we use and rely on everyday. Discover deeper content as a Premium member.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC