The Passing of Wintel? (Premium)

I’m a long-time fan of Jean-Louis Gassée, the former Apple exec and founder of Be, Inc. But his most recent missive needs to be addressed.

For the record, Gassée has been blogging about personal technology since blogging was a thing. I recall reading his thought back when Be was still an ongoing concern. And I’ve always been fascinated by his take on the industry.

These days, Gassée blogs at Medium, and as a paid subscriber, he’s one of the few voices I actually follow regularly on the service. He’s still got it, and he’s as interesting as he ever was.

(For whatever it’s worth, I still think Be would have been a better fit as a next-generation MacOS than was NeXT, though getting Steve Jobs back into the company obviously paid, rendering that argument moot.)

Yesterday, Gassée published a controversial post, Apple Silicon: The Passing of Wintel, to Medium in which he argues that the Mac’s transition to Apple Silicon will “force” Microsoft to “polish” Windows 10 on ARM, a move that will in turn cause PC makers to “reconsider their allegiance to x86 silicon and have serious consequences for the old Wintel partnership.”

Many will likely have an immediate and visceral reaction to this notion, and I will admit that I saw the post yesterday, read through it quickly, and then bookmarked it so I could go over it again today. Not surprisingly, his post was covered broadly today, especially in the Apple-centric blogs that would lap up such a thing unthinkingly.

But since I’m currently reviewing a modern Windows 10 on ARM laptop, I feel particularly well-positioned to consider what Gassée is proposing. Because today, Windows 10 on ARM is nowhere near ready for primetime despite years of improvements to the hardware and the software.

And while I appreciate Gassée’s premise, he’s wrong about the choices that Microsoft---really, the PC industry---has. He claims that Microsoft can either “either forget Windows [10] on ARM and cede modern PCs to Apple, or forge ahead, fix app compatibility problems and offer an ARM-based alternative to Apple’s new Macs.”

But those are not Microsoft’s only choices, and in this case, I sort of wish that Gassée had read me. As I’ve noted in the past, Windows 10 on ARM exists for one reason and one reason only: To goad Intel into making more efficient mobile chipsets. Microsoft doesn’t care if Qualcomm ARM wins. It just wants Intel to have some competition so that it will show up and do its best work. (And in this arena, Microsoft’s experience rings true: Intel, like Microsoft, doesn’t do well when there’s no viable competition.)

The good news? Intel does have competition now. It’s just that it’s not coming from ARM, at least not in the PC space, it’s coming from AMD. And AMD, which already led the way to x86-64 (the 64-bit version of x86 that it calls x64), forcing Intel to follow, could do it again.

Of course, the problem for Microsof...

Gain unlimited access to Premium articles.

With technology shaping our everyday lives, how could we not dig deeper?

Thurrott Premium delivers an honest and thorough perspective about the technologies we use and rely on everyday. Discover deeper content as a Premium member.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC