Tearing Down Apple’s Feeble Response to Spotify (Premium)

Apple responded to Spotify’s complaint about its abusive business practices in the only way it can: Ineffectively.

“After using the App Store for years to dramatically grow their business, Spotify seeks to keep all the benefits of the App Store ecosystem — including the substantial revenue that they draw from the App Store’s customers — without making any contributions to that marketplace,” an Apple statement notes. “At the same time, they distribute the music you love while making ever-smaller contributions to the artists, musicians, and songwriters who create it — even going so far as to take these creators to court.”

Woah.

Those are two unrelated charges, the second of which is quite spurious and---more to the point---completely unrelated to Spotify’s complaint against Apple. Like someone who has already lost an argument, Apple is lashing out at the party that embarrassed it and trying to shift the discussion elsewhere, lest the harsh light of reality is shown on the actual, valid complaint.

Which is this.

Not that Spotify is “wrapping its financial motivations in misleading rhetoric,” as Apple also claims, but rather that Apple is doing so. As Spotify complained, accurately, Apple’s App Store is not the level playing field that Apple presents. Instead, Apple gives its own apps and services visible preference over its competitors, such as in search results.

(Search for music in the App Store and count the number of Apple apps that appear before Spotify in the results. There are 7 Apple apps, including all five of the top five, the first of which is an advertisement. Spotify, the most popular music app in the App Store, is somehow the 11th result in that list.)

Apple also disadvantages Spotify by requiring that it pay Apple 30 percent of all revenue derived from users of its iOS app. Apple Music, meanwhile, does not suffer from this vig, and is in fact subsidized by the sales of the devices on which it (and Spotify) run, another unfair advantage. Apple also doesn’t allow users of its HomePod smart speaker to choose Spotify as their music service … for some reason. Spotify was likewise locked out of Apple Watch until the firm complained about it publicly. (Apple then suddenly approved its app.)

What this all points to is that Apple is giving its own apps and services unfair---and illegal---advantages over competitors on its own platforms. And given all that, let’s re-read Apple’s statement about Spotify wanting to “keep all the benefits of the App Store ecosystem … without making any contributions to that marketplace” and see it for the hypocrisy and double-speak that it is.

No, Apple. Spotify does not get all of the benefits of the App Store ecosystem. It gets locked out of key parts of it, and is required to pay fees where Apple does not, because Apple has decided that the service Spotify offers is one it wants for itself. There is no amount of words from Apple that ...

Gain unlimited access to Premium articles.

With technology shaping our everyday lives, how could we not dig deeper?

Thurrott Premium delivers an honest and thorough perspective about the technologies we use and rely on everyday. Discover deeper content as a Premium member.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC