I’ll try and keep this short.
The big benefits of Chromebooks are low cost, low maintennce, limited software, and built to thing everyone does; get online.
In education the devices are a boon because of these factors and of the fact Chromebooks come with Google Apps schools don’t have to pay extra for. All this will be a challenge for Windows Cloud.
Now it’s not an unwinnable fight.
For one the Chromebook growth seems to be limited as of now. North America and especially the US is where they’ve seen movement. Also those Chrome OS gains come at the expense of Macs/iOS. Secondly Chrome is still reliant (or seems to be heavily reliant on) a web connection. This is fine for places where there is a steady internet, but not everywhere.
For Windows Cloud Microsoft could make the argument about creating a platform that 1) grows with the student, 2) Offers software/services that enhance learning, and 3) Is low maintence for teachers and staff.
Now for Microsoft the key will be in balancing the heaviness of Windows with its benefits. Chrome is light and fast and limited. And by liited I mean their is enough there to get things done, but not enough for distraction. Windows will have to match that. In Redmond’s favor Cloud offers offline in ways ChromeOS doesn’t.
Also Microsoft is going to have to over FREE apps. I mean OneNote is a big thing for Cloud but they need the full Office suite there. I mean this is anecdotal but a lot of students grabbed RT devices because they were simple, good enough Word devices.
Lastly Microsoft needs to stick the landing with mangeability. Chromebboks don’t require an IT staff and Windows Cloud shouldn’t either. This might be the biggest hurdle for Microsoft. We will see how it goes on May 2.
skane2600
<p>I you think RT devices were a big win with students I can see why you're optimistic for Windows Cloud. </p>
skane2600
<blockquote><em><a href="#99448">In reply to jimchamplin:</a></em></blockquote><p>i didn't claim that no student used them, but if they had been very popular with students (or any other group), they would have sold better and Microsoft would have continued the product line.</p>
skane2600
<blockquote><em><a href="#99577">In reply to hrlngrv:</a></em></blockquote><p>If our understanding of what this product consists of is correct, its initial configuration runs only UWP apps. If MS had a full featured Office that runs under UWP, I would think they would have offered it already to promote UWP. But in any case, the nearly-compatible version of Office it offered for WinRT wasn't enough to make the product a success, so I don't know if it would matter much to Windows Cloud either.</p>
skane2600
<blockquote><em><a href="#99634">In reply to DaQuantumFro:</a></em></blockquote><p>Yes, that's the way I remember it too. </p>
skane2600
<blockquote><em><a href="#99655">In reply to Jeff Goldman:</a></em></blockquote><p>I don't think Microsoft Works is really relevant to this discussion but since it existed from DOS in 1987 through Windows until it was canceled in 2009, I think the evidence suggests that it was, in fact, a successful product.</p><p><br></p><p>I'm not inclined to believe that Windows Cloud is going to be a big success, but I think the idea that Google Apps are superior to Microsoft's online Office apps for light work is a hard case to make. Any school that doesn't have a robust internet connection shouldn't be considering either product.</p>