A Closer Look at Halo Infinite’s Turbulent Journey

Last week, Microsoft announced that Halo Infinite would be delayed until 2021, but there have been challenges building the game that started long before this announcement. Starting prior to E3 2019, I have been hearing tidbits about the development process and when Phil Spencer validated my report that 343 said was not accurate from late July, it was time to put together the story of everything that I had heard leading up to that reveal.

Jumping into a time machine to 2015, 343 embarked on building the successor to Halo 5. Referred to initially as Halo 6, the company was going for a rebuild of nearly everything Halo. They were building a new game engine called Slip Space and the team was laying the foundation to build a launch title of the next-generation Xbox, the series X.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Building a new game for a console that has not been announced is quite the challenge and is often why launch titles are sometimes lacking in the graphics department because they aren’t quite sure where the final specs will land. Sure, they have a rough idea but it’s typically easier to scale up graphics than to cut down on quality if the new console doesn’t live up to the paper promise. Meaning, would you rather have reduced graphical fidelity at 90FPS or better quality graphics but at 25FPS?

On top of that, 343 was building a new game engine, for an unannounced console, for a game that would ship at the same time as the new Xbox. If you are trying to take the path of most resistance to launch a new game, this is the perfect route to take – and then you toss in COVID-19 for the cherry-on-top.

But the story of difficulties starts long before July of 2020 and as far as I’m aware, the difficulties started to surface before E3 2019.

One of the challenges of building Halo Infinite is that a significant portion of the game is being outsourced to third-party contractors. This is not all that unusual but the coordination between the many different companies contributing to Infinite has been rough, at best. One person familiar with the company’s plans indicated that they believed the out-sourcing for Infinite was at a ratio higher than a typical studio undertakes during development which has caused significant headaches for cross-development collaboration.

If you go back and watch the E3 trailer of Halo Infinite in 2019, that game looks remarkably better than what was shown in July of 2020. How can a game decline significantly in quality with an additional year of development time? It doesn’t make sense and if you go back to the 2018 announcement of the title and the demo of what the Slip Space engine is capable of creating, the July event looks even worse.

It’s my understanding that the 2019 trailer was again outsourced and at that time, the game was not in a state that was playable at that level of fidelity. Even though the trailer says “Game Engine Footage” – this is a nebulous term as we don’t know if this is an attempt to show what gameplay would look like (not plausible at this time based on what we have seen) or what cut-scenes would look like which is the more plausible explanation but this vastly over-sold expectation for Infinite’s later demos.

Multiple people familiar with the development efforts behind 343 have described the collaborative effort behind the development as challenging and significant disagreements internally have become public with Tim Longo, creative director for Halo Infinite, leaving the company in August of 2019.

Appointed to Tim’s role after he left was Mary Olsen, who left the company in October of that same year. At the time, 343 said “There’s no creative dilemma inside the studio” but clearly there was turmoil inside the walls about the development progress of the game.

One of the big questions that started to manifest late in 2019 was how could 343 change the path forward for Halo Infinite so that they could actually meet the holiday 2020 deadline. Phil Spencer has confirmed that splitting up the campaign and multiplayer was a serious consideration but this was not a recent discussion as many had assumed as this option started being considered in early 2020 or possibly late 2019.

The final decision to ship the game as either a complete title or separate parts may have been more recent but the idea of shipping two separate pieces has persisted for about a year or so.

One insider states that the production of the Halo TV series for ShowTime has been a significant distraction for 343 management. Often times taking their priority instead of focusing on making sure development progress is on the right path to reaching its targeted deadline.

One of the other disconnects I have been hearing about more recently is that engineering and marketing have been on two different planets. Engineering has been asking for delays and to hold material back but marketing has been plowing forward.

An example of this happened a couple of weeks ago with the Halo team announcing that multiplayer would be free and run at 120FPS. Why would the marketing team push this out and generate another wave of pre-release excitement for the game if management knew that the game was likely to be delayed? Marketing won the argument and those on the engineering side sat on the sidelines as marketing kept pushing more Halo news out the door with the reality being that the game was unlikely to ship anytime soon.

When you look at all of the issues facing 343 including a new engine, significant outsourced development, turnover in key positions, trailers that regressed in quality, and then sprinkle COIVD-19 on top, it’s not all that surprising that things have not been going as smooth as many had hoped. The question is how is 343 going to correct the course so that they can actually ship a game that lives up to the promises that have been made?

But the biggest challenge of all may be internal. Microsoft has invested hundreds of millions of dollars into Halo Infinite with the end goal being a title that would elevate Xbox series X at launch but we all know that’s no longer going to happen.





Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 11 comments

  • Ron Diaz

    17 August, 2020 - 4:31 pm

    <p>looks like preordering the PS5 is the way to go. I can’t believe MS messed up 2 consoles in a row…</p>

    • irfaanwahid

      18 August, 2020 - 1:22 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#562064">In reply to Hypnotoad:</a></em></blockquote><p>The article refers to Halo Infinite's development and delays. How does that make PS5 better than XSX?</p>

      • gallardosvk

        18 August, 2020 - 1:40 am

        <blockquote><em><a href="#562181">In reply to irfaanwahid:</a></em></blockquote><p><br></p><p>His comment shows the exact definition of exclusivity bias. For me, there's a whole bunch of other titles that are to be available Day One and as a part of Xbox Game Pass including Yakuza and The Medium. For him, there's a disappointment because of being able to play only 11 out of 12 Halo games playable Day One on Xbox Series X.</p>

        • Paul Thurrott

          Premium Member
          18 August, 2020 - 8:41 am

          lol well.

          Yes, but … it’s the one game virtually everyone was the most excited for, and the first party title that we all assumed would best show off the capabilities of this platform. What it’s turned into is a huge disappointment. That’s completely understandable. They’ve had several years to make this game. It’s not like this was a surprise.

          • mikentosh

            Premium Member
            20 August, 2020 - 2:41 pm

            <blockquote><em><a href="#562213">In reply to paul-thurrott:</a></em></blockquote><p>At some point, if 343 was honest with MS, the simultaneous launch date could have been delayed internally. This looks to me like 343 folks were just nodding their heads to MS telling them what they wanted to hear.</p>

  • shawnthebeachy

    17 August, 2020 - 4:41 pm

    <p>Paragraph 16, "<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">COIVD-19" :)</span></p>

  • xabbott

    17 August, 2020 - 5:04 pm

    <p>The 120fps thing was leaked by a toyline not marketing. The management of the tv show is handled by the same management that handles the books, comics, events, etc. Also you mention 2019…are you still getting your Halo info from the same insiders that told you it'd be playable at E3 2019 and that also said xcloud would be the focus? (see Microsoft Aims to Set the Bar High at E3)</p><p><br></p><p>I'd really like to know whats happening at 343 but a lot of this is surface level observations. Especially that part on the outsourcing. </p>

  • codymesh

    18 August, 2020 - 12:19 am

    <p>Actually, many big games and big developers face such hurdles in development. The only real difference I see here is leadership. Leadership turmoil is definitely a sign of how things heading either downhill or, at the very least, missed promises (which has already happened).</p>

  • johnclark

    18 August, 2020 - 9:15 am

    <p>Marketing: "We're going to zoom in on the main villain's face at the end of the trailer"</p><p><br></p><p>Artist: "But the textures aren't done yet…"</p><p><br></p><p>Marketing: "Also make the music crescendo as he says these lines, I wrote them myself while watching He-Man last night" </p><p><br></p><p><br></p>

  • elessar25

    19 August, 2020 - 12:32 pm

    <p>Many big budget titles have been postponed. Cyberpunk, Last Of Us 2, etc. The problem is that CD Projekt Red and Naughty Dog have a good track record and everyone gives them benefit of the doubt. With Halo 4's subpar multiplayer and Halo 5's joke of single player, 343 doesn't deserve the same treatment. I don't see how more time will help them get this right. Bring back Bungie pls!!</p>

    • cainhurst

      22 August, 2020 - 2:24 am

      <blockquote><em><a href="#562495">In reply to elessar25:</a></em></blockquote><p>I think the other issue is one creative lead leaving is bad but to have the second leave so quickly is a very bad sign! In any creative medium it is always looked at negatively. CDPR and ND still maintain the main creative team so the vision is still strong</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2023 Thurrott LLC