The First Set of PWAs Land on the Microsoft Store

Back in February, Microsoft confirmed its plans for bringing Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) to Windows 10. At the time, the company said it will start crawling the web for high-quality PWA apps and bring them to the Microsoft Store as standalone applications.

As promised, we started seeing some new PWAs on the Microsoft Store starting late last month when Twitter replaced its native UWP app with its new PWA app on the Microsoft Store. In addition to Twitter, Microsoft has started releasing some other PWAs on the Microsoft Store, as first spotted by Italian blog Aggiornamenti Lumia. The first set of PWAs on the Microsoft include popular UK-based online shopping service ASOS, Skyscanner, Men’s Wearhouse, SDN, and a couple of other apps shown in the screenshot above.

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — and get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

These new PWAs on the Microsoft Store are essentially the regular websites wrapped inside an application. Unlike the Twitter PWA, however, some of these apps don’t seem to be making use of the main PWA features such as push notifications. But that shouldn’t be too much of a problem as PWAs can be updated just like regular websites without needing to actually update the app on the Microsoft Store. After all, the whole point of bringing PWAs to the Microsoft Store is to expand its collection of apps, and not really about the native features — in other words, regular users will continue to interact with these apps just like a regular app without knowing what’s happening behind the scenes.

Tagged with

Share post

Please check our Community Guidelines before commenting

Conversation 62 comments

  • BlackForestHam

    07 April, 2018 - 6:16 am

    <p>Is there a thesaurus PWA available in the Microsoft Store? I suggest you look for one in the Microsoft Store, Mehedii, and download it. From the Microsoft Store.</p><p><br></p><p>Microsoft Store. </p>

    • Chris

      07 April, 2018 - 7:19 am

      <blockquote><a href="#260400"><em>In reply to BlackForestHam:</em></a></blockquote><p>You could have simply, and politely, pointed out that Mehedi did overuse "Microsoft Store" in the story, rather than acting like a prick, and doing it as bluntly as you did…</p>

      • BlackForestHam

        08 April, 2018 - 6:39 am

        <blockquote><a href="#260416"><em>In reply to c.hucklebridge:</em></a></blockquote><p>LOL. Thanks, dad. Go sit on a cactus. Mehedi's writing sucks, consistently. </p>

      • NextWithoutFor

        08 April, 2018 - 6:52 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#260416"><em>In reply to c.hucklebridge:</em></a></blockquote><p>Go throw yourself off the Chuckle Bridge, laughing boy. </p>

    • jbinaz

      07 April, 2018 - 9:12 am

      <blockquote><a href="#260400"><em>In reply to BlackForestHam:</em></a></blockquote><p>And if you're going to be an asshole, then at least spell his name right. Mehedi, with one "i" at the end, not two.</p><p><br></p><p>The guy does a damn good job of writing a LOT, every day. </p>

    • Angusmatheson

      07 April, 2018 - 10:33 am

      <blockquote><em>Microsoft store is a painful name. The original as I recall was “store” which was terrible because so vague. Windows Store followed – which I think was the best because it at least tells me it is where you buy things for your Windows computers – so apps and such. Now for me Microsoft Store is that place in the mall next to tu Apple store. So the fact that Micrsoft store refers both to an a digital store for apps and a physical store is confusing. I know Microsoft is trying to get away from the Windows Brand – but this is just perverse. (It doesn’t help that Microsoft is perhaps the worst name in tech. I know it is from microcomputer and software put together – but why choose micro and soft. How about computerware. Or Mi-software or MS. Or A random rare nonsense word like Amazon and Google. But of all of them Microsoft is the worst. It just sounds small and weak.)</em><a href="#260400"><em>In reply to BlackForestHam:</em></a></blockquote><p><br></p>

      • warren

        07 April, 2018 - 12:27 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#260436"><em>In reply to Angusmatheson:</em></a></blockquote><p><br></p><p>Wait, what? Having a physical store and an app with the same name is confusing to you? </p><p><br></p><p>Really?</p><p><br></p><p>……. <em>Really?</em></p><p><br></p><p>How stupid do you have to be to be confused by something like this?</p>

  • BigM72

    07 April, 2018 - 6:42 am

    <p>As a user, I need a reason to install these as apps on my system versus just browsing them as websites or having a long list of bookmarks. </p><p><br></p><p>It makes sense for Twitter, some others may make sense if they adopt the features (e.g. price alerts from Skyscanner). If not, it's just clutter in the store. </p>

    • SocialDanny123

      07 April, 2018 - 6:50 am

      <blockquote><a href="#260402"><em>In reply to BigM72:</em></a></blockquote><p><br></p><p>It depends on the user, it's because these can be accessed offline, that IMO is a major difference. TBH Pretty much every app that is not complex will likely be added to the Store and become PWA. </p>

      • BigM72

        07 April, 2018 - 11:34 am

        <blockquote><a href="#260414"><em>In reply to SocialDanny123:</em></a></blockquote><p>How many of them will have a usable and useful offline access, not many I expect given their web origins.</p>

      • SvenJ

        07 April, 2018 - 2:04 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#260414"><em>In reply to SocialDanny123:</em></a> Why would you want a P Web A offline? These are essentially web access applications, just outside a browser. Off-line, Twitter, Starbucks, etc aren't particularly compelling. </blockquote><p><br></p>

    • Usman

      Premium Member
      07 April, 2018 - 7:42 am

      <blockquote><a href="#260402"><em>In reply to BigM72:</em></a></blockquote><p>The benefit of it is so that the application has it's own window frame and more or less most pwa like twitter, kayak, starbucks are good app experiences. </p><p><br></p><p>For users that don't know pwas or aren't used to adding sites to the home screens, having a store listing of a pwa is a win for the consumer and the app dev, as adding to home screen is a software acquisition Paradigm that consumers aren't used to. </p>

      • BigM72

        07 April, 2018 - 11:33 am

        <blockquote><a href="#260418"><em>In reply to Usman:</em></a></blockquote><p><br></p><p>What's a homescreen in the context of PCs? You mean the desktop? The taskbar? the start menu?</p>

        • SvenJ

          07 April, 2018 - 2:00 pm

          <blockquote><a href="#260442"><em>In reply to BigM72:</em></a> Yea, all/any of those.</blockquote><p><br></p>

  • rameshthanikodi

    07 April, 2018 - 7:34 am

    <p>how do the live tiles/icons for these PWAs look?</p>

    • PeteB

      07 April, 2018 - 10:35 am

      <blockquote><a href="#260417"><em>In reply to FalseAgent:</em></a></blockquote><p>Said no one ever</p>

      • rameshthanikodi

        07 April, 2018 - 1:14 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#260437"><em>In reply to PeteB:</em></a></blockquote><p>what? It's a legit question. Does the icon/tile look decent or is it like some rubbish favicon?</p><p><br></p><p>How the fuck am I getting downvoted for this? Jesus</p>

        • Mikhul

          07 April, 2018 - 4:17 pm

          <blockquote><a href="#260474"><em>In reply to FalseAgent:</em></a></blockquote><p>Facepalm. There is no LIVE TILE because they aren't real apps. They are web wrappers. A pointer to a website.</p>

          • BigM72

            08 April, 2018 - 2:51 am

            <blockquote><a href="#260501"><em>In reply to Mikhul:</em></a></blockquote><p>But the PWAs are extensible to take into account platform features. They can use Live Tiles if they want to.</p>

            • skane2600

              08 April, 2018 - 3:16 am

              <blockquote><a href="#260601"><em>In reply to BigM72:</em></a></blockquote><p>I don't know if they can use Live Tiles or not but if they could, that would mean that the PWA wouldn't run identically on all systems or perhaps not run at all on a non-Windows platform. This is one of the fundamental problems with all "can run anywhere" schemes. You have to constrict the design of the software so it doesn't use any capabilities that aren't shared by all the platforms you want to run on.</p>

              • Jeremy Petzold

                08 April, 2018 - 5:10 pm

                <blockquote><a href="#260603"><em>In reply to skane2600:</em></a></blockquote><p>Right….they allow for a significant code base to be used across platforms and then the developer can choose to incorporate platform functions too.</p><p><br></p><p>If the PWA platform gets built right (and maybe it has) the integration framework can be generic for the developer while the platforms handle the "what to do" part of the it.</p><p><br></p><p>User.Notify(foo) could get handled differently on Android, iOS, Windows 10, Mac OS….but the developer just communicates the intention using the method and meets the data structure requirements (I assume JSON object of some kind).</p>

                • skane2600

                  08 April, 2018 - 7:55 pm

                  <blockquote><a href="#260775"><em>In reply to Jeremy_Petzold:</em></a></blockquote><p>A "significant code base to be used across platforms" has always been the standard approach for cross-platform development, but it doesn't eliminate the extra effort required to support multiple platforms.</p><p><br></p><p>In practice you can't always wrap platform-specific functions with a generic function call. Following that course leads to TheBigFunctionThatDoesEverything().</p><p><br></p><p>Whether the platform-specific characteristics are embodied in code or in data structures doesn't matter, they are still there. What you end up with is platform-specific "stuff" residing in a common&nbsp;set of files. This is cross-platform coupling with all the problems that such coupling brings.</p>

          • Jeremy Petzold

            08 April, 2018 - 5:06 pm

            <blockquote><a href="#260501"><em>In reply to Mikhul:</em></a></blockquote><p>No, PWAs allow for sites to have live tiles as well as a host of other platform integrations. But apparently because a small list of junky PWS developers were first to the starting line they determine what PWAs can be…got it.</p>

        • mmuntean

          11 April, 2018 - 4:32 am

          <blockquote><a href="#260474"><em>In reply to FalseAgent:</em></a></blockquote><p>You get downvoted by desperate fanbabies that do not accept anything negative said towards Microcrap, even if it's plain true.</p>

  • mrdrwest

    07 April, 2018 - 8:03 am

    <p>Sounds boring.</p><p><br></p><p>…but, I'm hopeful.</p>

  • mrdrwest

    07 April, 2018 - 8:05 am

    <p> The cross-platform synchronized PWA fart apps are coming…to the store!!!!!!!</p>

  • SherlockHolmes

    Premium Member
    07 April, 2018 - 8:34 am

    <p>Is this the best promised future in PWA apps on the desktop? Wrapped websites? No thanks. Another dead end for the Microsoft Store. </p>

    • pachi

      07 April, 2018 - 10:11 am

      <blockquote><a href="#260424"><em>In reply to SherlockHolmes:</em></a></blockquote><p><br></p><p>I see praise for the new Twitter PWA and I'm not seeing it… It may have more features available, but it's just their ugly website wrapped in an app, and is much slower than the old UWP app.</p>

      • SherlockHolmes

        Premium Member
        07 April, 2018 - 10:19 am

        <blockquote><a href="#260432"><em>In reply to pachi:</em></a></blockquote><p>As I said many times: I dont see the advantage why I should install a PWA app on my PC, when I just can open the damn website in a browser? For me this new hype makes no sense. </p>

        • pachi

          07 April, 2018 - 10:28 am

          <blockquote><a href="#260433"><em>In reply to SherlockHolmes:</em></a></blockquote><p>There isn't one – so long as PWA's remain just as a wrapped website. Mobile developers have for years had the option of just embedding the website as an app – maybe it's grown even easier over the years, but the reason they didn't do this is because wrapping a website as an app doesn't do anything for anyone. I have no problem with twitter using the website as a backbone for their app, for example, but the app itself having all the website content is just crazy. This is not an app in any capacity. This is evidenced by the fact that it loads much more slowly than their UWP app – there's no way to adjust the looks, etc… </p>

        • pachi

          07 April, 2018 - 10:30 am

          <blockquote><a href="#260433"><em>In reply to SherlockHolmes:</em></a></blockquote><p>Another great example I just thought of is the Mail app on WIndows 10 – they've been making their website more and more like it lately. The website BARELY functions on my laptop using Edge – it's so slow and clunky, but the app is smooth as butter. I hope their endgame isn't to make that a PWA too. This is not working.</p>

          • mmuntean

            11 April, 2018 - 4:28 am

            <blockquote><a href="#260435"><em>In reply to pachi:</em></a></blockquote><p>No one is to blame you keep using that pathetic Edge instead o a more decent browser…</p>

        • Usman

          Premium Member
          07 April, 2018 - 11:53 am

          <blockquote><a href="#260433"><em>In reply to SherlockHolmes:</em></a></blockquote><p>The hype is more towards developers and for the future, a single code base that works everywhere. Yes you can get twitter lite or Google apps on a browser, but also you can have them in an isolated window and it looks like a separate app. </p><p><br></p><p>It's the next step after electron apps, Slack, Teams, Discord, VS Code etc run an instance of chrome to run, even though you can access web versions near instantly with now download.</p><p><br></p><p>Now you can get those apps in a native shell that are now a couple of meg instead of 100s of megabytes.</p><p><br></p><p>That's all technical stuff, it makes development processes better, as now its a single code base across all platforms.</p>

          • SherlockHolmes

            Premium Member
            07 April, 2018 - 12:38 pm

            <blockquote><a href="#260445"><em>In reply to Usman:</em></a></blockquote><p>Again, what normal consumer needs that? Whats so better when a site opens in a shell then in a browser? There are websites today that can give desktop notifications if you want. </p>

            • Soundtweaker

              07 April, 2018 - 10:36 pm

              <blockquote><a href="#260461"><em>In reply to SherlockHolmes:</em></a> Maybe you should be asking, Why should I have to open my browser and go to a URL when I could just click the PWA app on my desktop?</blockquote><p><br></p>

              • SherlockHolmes

                Premium Member
                07 April, 2018 - 10:45 pm

                <blockquote><a href="#260572"><em>In reply to Soundtweaker:</em></a></blockquote><p>And whats the difference in opening a app other then opening your browser? </p>

              • mmuntean

                11 April, 2018 - 4:29 am

                <blockquote><a href="#260572"><em>In reply to Soundtweaker:</em></a></blockquote><p>…maybe because it works better in a decent browser? Not that junk Edge…</p>

            • Jeremy Petzold

              08 April, 2018 - 5:03 pm

              <blockquote><a href="#260461"><em>In reply to SherlockHolmes:</em></a></blockquote><p>Those notifications require Chrome to be installed. FFS, PWA is the future. All the browser makers are supporting the same standard. They all want to put them in their stores. The app developers can provide the same back end code and client code with call outs for specific desktop integrations if they want to be more friendly to the device.</p><p><br></p><p>How hard is that for everyone to understand?</p>

              • SherlockHolmes

                Premium Member
                08 April, 2018 - 9:13 pm

                <blockquote><a href="#260770"><em>In reply to Jeremy_Petzold:</em></a></blockquote><p>I hope you know that Chrome is the dominant browser anyways? And just because Microsoft and a few developers say "PWA is trhe future", that doesnt mean this will become true. Remember a time when MSFT said UWP is the future? Well, we all know how that ended! And do you really think that people will install a PWA app for every fav in their list? </p>

              • mmuntean

                11 April, 2018 - 4:31 am

                <blockquote><a href="#260770"><em>In reply to Jeremy_Petzold:</em></a></blockquote><p>Sorry but have you even checked the quality of the current PWAS???? compared to the actual APPS from IOS and Android???? Check then we'll talk…</p>

          • skane2600

            07 April, 2018 - 6:25 pm

            <blockquote><a href="#260445"><em>In reply to Usman:</em></a></blockquote><p>"a single code base that works everywhere."</p><p><br></p><p>There's never been such a thing and there never will be. </p>

        • Dick O'Rosary

          08 April, 2018 - 6:46 am

          <blockquote><a href="#260433"><em>In reply to SherlockHolmes:</em></a></blockquote><p>You have guys like Thurrott who seems quite obsessed with making websites run on standalone windows. Its his favorite feature on Google Chrome.</p>

    • Soundtweaker

      07 April, 2018 - 10:35 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#260424"><em>In reply to SherlockHolmes:</em></a> PWA's will be in all app stores not just MS.</blockquote><blockquote><br></blockquote><p><br></p>

      • SherlockHolmes

        Premium Member
        07 April, 2018 - 10:57 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#260571"><em>In reply to Soundtweaker:</em></a></blockquote><p>And why should a Windows user visit the Store now when he has never done so in the past? Just because there are websites wrapped in a shell suddenly? </p>

    • mmuntean

      11 April, 2018 - 4:28 am

      <blockquote><a href="#260424"><em>In reply to SherlockHolmes:</em></a></blockquote><p>That store is already dead…this is MS last desperate attempt to populate it with something, no matter it is useless on a desktop OS or not.</p>

  • rockycpa

    07 April, 2018 - 9:26 am

    <p>So what would it take for Thurrott.com to be a PWA?</p>

  • PeteB

    07 April, 2018 - 10:36 am

    <p>Pointless Web Wrappers</p>

    • Benjamin Taylor

      08 April, 2018 - 12:57 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#260438"><em>In reply to PeteB:</em></a></blockquote><p>Not at all.</p><p><br></p><p>The point of PWA's is that they can be <em>progressively </em>augmented with native OS features. Think native icons, native UI elements, live tiles, native notifications, integration with sharing options. They also should work offline and be able to work seamlessly in the background.</p><p><br></p><p>They're the best of the web and the best of the host desktop/phone/tablet OS combined.</p>

      • mmuntean

        11 April, 2018 - 4:27 am

        <blockquote><a href="#260676"><em>In reply to Benjamin_Taylor:</em></a></blockquote><p>Useless on a desktop OS. Windows 10 is a desktop OS…don't come with the tablet thing because it's pretty clear the tablet UI and UX is a complete nightmare on wincrap 10</p>

  • LocalPCGuy

    07 April, 2018 - 11:42 am

    <p>I wonder if Microsoft is able to monetize these PWA's. Based on where the app brings you, I presume that there is some form of revenue sharing going on, at least in some cases. If not, taking a percentage from developers that post custom, often worthwhile, apps on the Store seems destined to lead to hard feelings on the part of app developers.</p>

    • warren

      07 April, 2018 - 12:31 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#260444"><em>In reply to LocalPCGuy:</em></a></blockquote><p><br></p><p>PWAs are free. You can't monetize something like this, they're just regular web sites you can pin to your taskbar. </p>

      • Jeremy Petzold

        08 April, 2018 - 4:57 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#260459"><em>In reply to warren:</em></a></blockquote><p>If someone develops an app as a PWA with the intention of publishing it in a store for money they can do it. </p>

  • Jules Wombat

    08 April, 2018 - 9:28 am

    <p>So if PWA is to save the Microsoft Store, why doesn't Joe B, get his finger out to ensure PWA runs on Windows 10 mobile?</p><p>A store is only of utility if there is a mobile platform for it to serve. I know Microsoft have given up on mobile, so what purpose does any PWA serve anymore.</p>

    • skane2600

      08 April, 2018 - 12:02 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#260640"><em>In reply to Jules_Wombat:</em></a></blockquote><p>At this point any money Microsoft spends on mobile will be a waste. All of our family phones are Windows Phones yet I recognize the handwriting on the wall.</p>

      • xperiencewindows

        09 April, 2018 - 1:07 pm

        <blockquote><a href="#260667"><em>In reply to skane2600:</em></a></blockquote><p>Little late to be recognizing the handwriting on the wall…Windows Mobile has been completely removed from the microsoft website. Windows Mobile has been dead for over a year now..time to switch.</p>

        • skane2600

          09 April, 2018 - 7:46 pm

          <blockquote><a href="#261013"><em>In reply to xperiencewindows:</em></a></blockquote><p>Are you assuming that I bought those phones last week? For those of us with restricted budgets "time to switch" is usually when the product stops working. </p><p><br></p><p>You'd love my 1999 Ford Explorer I bought a year ago for $1000 because I needed a second vehicle. Most of the 20th century options don't work, but it still moves which is sufficient.</p>

    • Jeremy Petzold

      08 April, 2018 - 4:56 pm

      <blockquote><a href="#260640"><em>In reply to Jules_Wombat:</em></a></blockquote><p>I kinda feel uncomfortable having to be the one that tells you thins…but…Windows 10 Mobile, and windows in the mobile space in general, is dead. Gone. Done.</p>

    • Munsey Slack

      09 April, 2018 - 1:01 am

      <blockquote><a href="#260640"><em>In reply to Jules_Wombat:</em></a></blockquote><p>I just installed the Carfax app from the store on my Lumia 950XL and it seems to work perfectly. It may be that WinMo10 is already supporting PWAs.</p>

  • Byron Adams

    08 April, 2018 - 8:32 pm

    <p>How do I install the PWA from the URL? If I pin it, it brings it up in Edge.</p>

  • mmuntean

    11 April, 2018 - 4:24 am

    <p>:))) Now the fanboys of the magnificent junk yard app store can be happy. I've seen the Twitter PWA..what a junk compared to the IOS or Android app…PWAS won't bring users back to that app store. Why on earth would I use a crippled PWA instead of the full website on a desktop OS??</p>

Windows Intelligence In Your Inbox

Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thurrott © 2024 Thurrott LLC